• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy Versus Microdiscectomy for the Treatment of Lumbar Disc Herniation: Pain, Disability, and Complication Rate-A Randomized Clinical Trial.经皮内镜腰椎间盘切除术与显微椎间盘切除术治疗腰椎间盘突出症:疼痛、功能障碍及并发症发生率——一项随机临床试验
Int J Spine Surg. 2020 Feb 29;14(1):72-78. doi: 10.14444/7010. eCollection 2020 Feb.
2
A Comparison of Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy and Open Lumbar Microdiscectomy for Lumbar Disc Herniation in the Korean: A Meta-Analysis.经皮内镜腰椎间盘切除术与开放式腰椎显微切除术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的比较:一项荟萃分析。
Biomed Res Int. 2018 Aug 7;2018:9073460. doi: 10.1155/2018/9073460. eCollection 2018.
3
Percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy compared with microendoscopic discectomy for lumbar disc herniation: 1-year results of an ongoing randomized controlled trial.经皮椎间孔镜下椎间盘切除术与显微内镜下椎间盘切除术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的比较:一项正在进行的随机对照试验的1年结果
J Neurosurg Spine. 2018 Mar;28(3):300-310. doi: 10.3171/2017.7.SPINE161434. Epub 2018 Jan 5.
4
Open fenestration discectomy versus microscopic fenestration discectomy for lumbar disc herniation: a randomized controlled trial.开窗髓核切除术与显微镜下开窗髓核切除术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的随机对照研究。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020 Jun 15;21(1):384. doi: 10.1186/s12891-020-03396-x.
5
Percutaneous endoscopic discectomy: surgical technique and preliminary results compared to microsurgical discectomy.经皮内镜下椎间盘切除术:手术技术及与显微外科椎间盘切除术相比的初步结果
J Neurosurg. 1993 Feb;78(2):216-25. doi: 10.3171/jns.1993.78.2.0216.
6
Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy Versus Posterior Open Lumbar Microdiscectomy for the Treatment of Symptomatic Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis.经皮内窥镜腰椎间盘切除术与后路开放式腰椎显微椎间盘切除术治疗有症状的腰椎间盘突出症:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
World Neurosurg. 2018 Dec;120:352-362. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.08.236. Epub 2018 Sep 8.
7
Tubular discectomy versus conventional microdiscectomy for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation: long-term results of a randomised controlled trial.管状切除术与传统微创手术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的比较:一项随机对照试验的长期结果。
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2017 Dec;88(12):1008-1016. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2016-315306. Epub 2017 May 26.
8
Comparison of percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal discectomy, microendoscopic discectomy, and microdiscectomy for symptomatic lumbar disc herniation: minimum 2-year follow-up results.经皮内镜下经椎间孔椎间盘切除术、显微内镜下椎间盘切除术和显微椎间盘切除术治疗症状性腰椎间盘突出症的比较:至少2年的随访结果
J Neurosurg Spine. 2018 Mar;28(3):317-325. doi: 10.3171/2017.6.SPINE172. Epub 2018 Jan 5.
9
Analysis of the Characteristics and Clinical Outcomes of Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy for Upper Lumbar Disc Herniation.经皮内窥镜下腰椎间盘切除术治疗上位腰椎间盘突出症的特点及临床疗效分析。
World Neurosurg. 2016 Aug;92:142-147. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2016.04.127. Epub 2016 May 7.
10
Full endoscopic versus open discectomy for sciatica: randomised controlled non-inferiority trial.全内镜与开放椎间盘切除术治疗坐骨神经痛:随机对照非劣效性试验。
BMJ. 2022 Feb 21;376:e065846. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2021-065846.

引用本文的文献

1
Pressure changes at spinal epidural and intracranial regions in fresh cadavers during full endoscopic lumbar spine surgery with continuous irrigation.全内镜下腰椎手术持续冲洗时新鲜尸体脊柱硬膜外和颅内区域的压力变化
J Orthop Surg Res. 2025 Jul 8;20(1):618. doi: 10.1186/s13018-025-06023-4.
2
Comparison of different treatments for lumbar disc herniation: a network meta-analysis and systematic review.腰椎间盘突出症不同治疗方法的比较:网状Meta分析与系统评价
BMC Surg. 2025 Jul 3;25(1):259. doi: 10.1186/s12893-025-02992-9.
3
Percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy in patients with lumbar disc herniation: a meta-analysis.经皮椎间孔镜下椎间盘切除术治疗腰椎间盘突出症患者的Meta分析
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2025 Jun 24;35(1):276. doi: 10.1007/s00590-025-04374-6.
4
Strategies to Reduce Rebound Pain and Facilitate Early Recovery After Transforaminal Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy.减少经椎间孔内镜下腰椎间盘切除术后反弹痛并促进早期恢复的策略
J Clin Med. 2025 May 18;14(10):3529. doi: 10.3390/jcm14103529.
5
Comparison of the effects of microdiscectomy and interlaminar endoscopic lumbar discectomy on sexual activity.显微椎间盘切除术与椎间孔镜下腰椎间盘切除术对性功能影响的比较。
Eur Spine J. 2025 May 10. doi: 10.1007/s00586-025-08806-z.
6
Full-Endoscopic Spine Surgery : Its Roles and Limitations.全内镜脊柱手术:其作用与局限性
J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2025 Sep;68(5):511-527. doi: 10.3340/jkns.2024.0227. Epub 2025 May 8.
7
Extremely Rare Complications in Uniportal Spinal Endoscopy: A Systematic Review with Unique Case Analyses.单孔道脊柱内镜的极其罕见并发症:一项独特病例分析的系统评价
J Clin Med. 2024 Mar 19;13(6):1765. doi: 10.3390/jcm13061765.
8
Endoscopic versus microscopic discectomy for pathologies of lumbar spine: A nationwide cross-sectional study from a lower-middle-income country.腰椎疾病的内镜下与显微镜下椎间盘切除术:来自一个中低收入国家的全国性横断面研究。
J Craniovertebr Junction Spine. 2023 Oct-Dec;14(4):373-380. doi: 10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_39_23. Epub 2023 Nov 29.
9
ACUTE RADIATING LOW BACK PAIN IMPACT ON ROUTINE AND FUNCTION OF THE BRAZILIAN POPULATION: A CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY.急性放射性下腰痛对巴西人群日常活动及功能的影响:一项横断面研究。
Acta Ortop Bras. 2023 Oct 23;31(5):e266200. doi: 10.1590/1413-785220233105e266200. eCollection 2023.
10
Propensity matched outcome analysis following microdiscectomy versus interlaminar endoscopic discectomy for L5-S1 disc herniation.L5-S1椎间盘突出症行显微椎间盘切除术与椎板间内镜下椎间盘切除术的倾向评分匹配结果分析
J Orthop. 2023 Jul 18;42:87-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2023.07.006. eCollection 2023 Aug.

本文引用的文献

1
Incidence, Management, and Cost of Complications After Transforaminal Endoscopic Decompression Surgery for Lumbar Foraminal and Lateral Recess Stenosis: A Value Proposition for Outpatient Ambulatory Surgery.经椎间孔内镜减压手术治疗腰椎椎间孔及侧隐窝狭窄后并发症的发生率、处理及费用:门诊日间手术的价值主张
Int J Spine Surg. 2019 Feb 22;13(1):53-67. doi: 10.14444/6008. eCollection 2019 Jan.
2
Cost-effectiveness of microdiscectomy versus endoscopic discectomy for lumbar disc herniation.微创手术与内镜手术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的成本效益比较。
Spine J. 2019 Jul;19(7):1162-1169. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2019.02.003. Epub 2019 Feb 10.
3
Endoscopic and Microscopic Segmental Decompression via Translaminar Crossover Spinal Approach in Elderly Patients.经跨层脊柱侧方入路的内镜和显微镜下节段减压术在老年患者中的应用。
World Neurosurg. 2019 May;125:e361-e371. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.01.078. Epub 2019 Jan 28.
4
Endoscopic Spine Surgery.内镜脊柱手术
J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2017 Sep;60(5):485-497. doi: 10.3340/jkns.2017.0203.004. Epub 2017 Aug 30.
5
Transforaminal full-endoscopic lumbar discectomy in obese patients.肥胖患者的经椎间孔全内镜下腰椎间盘切除术
Int J Spine Surg. 2016 May 4;10:18. doi: 10.14444/3018. eCollection 2016.
6
Full-Endoscopic Procedures Versus Traditional Discectomy Surgery for Discectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Current Global Clinical Trials.全内镜手术与传统椎间盘切除术治疗椎间盘突出症的比较:当前全球临床试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
Pain Physician. 2016 Mar;19(3):103-18.
7
Efficacy of Transforaminal Endoscopic Spine System (TESSYS) Technique in Treating Lumbar Disc Herniation.经椎间孔内镜脊柱系统(TESSYS)技术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的疗效
Med Sci Monit. 2016 Feb 18;22:530-9. doi: 10.12659/msm.894870.
8
Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy for L5-S1 Disc Herniation: Consideration of the Relation between the Iliac Crest and L5-S1 Disc.经皮内镜下L5-S1椎间盘切除术治疗L5-S1椎间盘突出症:髂嵴与L5-S1椎间盘关系的考量
Pain Physician. 2016 Feb;19(2):E301-8.
9
Risk Factors for Surgical Site Infection After Spinal Surgery: A Meta-Analysis.脊柱手术后手术部位感染的危险因素:一项荟萃分析。
World Neurosurg. 2016 Nov;95:507-515. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2015.05.059. Epub 2015 Jun 6.
10
The "inside out" transforaminal technique to treat lumbar spinal pain in an awake and aware patient under local anesthesia: results and a review of the literature.局部麻醉下对清醒且有意识的患者采用“由内向外”经椎间孔技术治疗腰椎疼痛:结果及文献综述
Int J Spine Surg. 2014 Dec 1;8. doi: 10.14444/1028. eCollection 2014.

经皮内镜腰椎间盘切除术与显微椎间盘切除术治疗腰椎间盘突出症:疼痛、功能障碍及并发症发生率——一项随机临床试验

Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy Versus Microdiscectomy for the Treatment of Lumbar Disc Herniation: Pain, Disability, and Complication Rate-A Randomized Clinical Trial.

作者信息

Meyer Guilherme, DA Rocha Ivan Dias, Cristante Alexandre Fogaça, Marcon Raphael Martus, Coutinho Thiago Pereira, Torelli Alessandro Gonzalez, Petersen Pedro Araujo, Letaif Olavo Biraghi, DE Barros Filho Tarcísio Eloy Pessoa

机构信息

Spine Surgery Division, Instituto de Ortopedia e Traumatologia da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, FMUSP, São Paulo, Brazil.

Spine Surgery Division, Instituto Vita, São Paulo, Brazil.

出版信息

Int J Spine Surg. 2020 Feb 29;14(1):72-78. doi: 10.14444/7010. eCollection 2020 Feb.

DOI:10.14444/7010
PMID:32128306
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7043817/
Abstract

PURPOSE

The objective was to compare the traditional microdiscectomy with percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy for the treatment of disc herniations regarding pain, disability, and complications.

METHODS

Randomized clinical trial with 47 patients with disc herniations treated with 2 different surgical techniques: traditional microdiscectomy or percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy. Forty-seven patients were divided into 2 groups and monitored for 12 months. Irradiated and low back pain were evaluated with the visual analog scale. Surgery complications were recorded.

RESULTS

After surgery, the sciatica and disability improved significantly but without significant differences between the groups. Improvements in back pain were significant until the third month. There were no statistical differences between groups regarding recurrence, infection, and the need for reoperation.

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopic discectomy results are similar to those of conventional microdiscectomy regarding pain and disability improvement. Postoperative lumbar pain is less intense with endoscopic discectomy than conventional microdiscectomy only during the first 3 months. Endoscopic discectomy is a safe and efficient alternative to microdiscectomy.

CLINICAL TRIALS

Trial protocol registration number: RBR-5symrd (http://www.ensaiosclinicos.gov.br).

摘要

目的

比较传统显微椎间盘切除术与经皮内镜下腰椎间盘切除术治疗椎间盘突出症在疼痛、功能障碍及并发症方面的差异。

方法

对47例椎间盘突出症患者进行随机临床试验,采用两种不同的手术技术治疗:传统显微椎间盘切除术或经皮内镜下腰椎间盘切除术。47例患者分为两组,随访12个月。采用视觉模拟量表评估坐骨神经痛和腰痛情况。记录手术并发症。

结果

术后,坐骨神经痛和功能障碍均有显著改善,但两组间无显著差异。腰痛在术后第三个月前有显著改善。两组在复发、感染及再次手术需求方面无统计学差异。

结论

在内镜下椎间盘切除术与传统显微椎间盘切除术在改善疼痛和功能障碍方面效果相似。仅在术后前3个月,内镜下椎间盘切除术所致的术后腰痛较传统显微椎间盘切除术轻。内镜下椎间盘切除术是显微椎间盘切除术的一种安全有效的替代方法。

临床试验

试验方案注册号:RBR-5symrd(http://www.ensaiosclinicos.gov.br)。