Central China Normal University, Wuhan, China.
Wuhan University of Technology, China.
J Interpers Violence. 2022 Jan;37(1-2):195-220. doi: 10.1177/0886260520907361. Epub 2020 Mar 4.
It is common knowledge that bullying victimization and coping strategies significantly affect the psychological well-being of children. However, which coping strategies are more effective at a particular level of bullying victimization is underexplored. Using survey data from 1,634 children from 10 schools in Wuhan, China, this study aims to investigate the abovementioned research gap. The results of factor analysis suggest that coping strategies of children in China can be divided into three types: help-seeking, avoidance, and self-defense. The results of multilevel modeling suggest that children adopting different coping strategies have distinct levels of depression. Help seekers show a significantly lower level of depression than self-defenders and avoiders. However, with increased bullying victimization, the effectiveness of the help-seeking strategy gradually decreases to offset the negative effect of bullying victimization on psychological well-being. Instead, those who adopt the self-defense strategy display a lower level of depression. The findings of this study suggest that there is no single coping strategy that is best for children, and the more effective strategy largely relies on the level of bullying victimization. The findings also imply that without external support, it is almost impossible for children to completely overcome the negative consequences of bullying on their own.
众所周知,欺凌受害和应对策略会显著影响儿童的心理健康。然而,在特定的欺凌受害程度下,哪种应对策略更为有效,这方面的研究还不够充分。本研究使用来自中国武汉 10 所学校的 1634 名儿童的调查数据,旨在探讨上述研究空白。因子分析的结果表明,中国儿童的应对策略可以分为三种类型:寻求帮助、回避和自我保护。多层次模型的结果表明,采用不同应对策略的儿童抑郁程度也不同。求助者的抑郁程度明显低于自我保护者和回避者。然而,随着欺凌受害程度的增加,寻求帮助策略的有效性逐渐降低,以抵消欺凌受害对心理健康的负面影响。相反,采用自我保护策略的儿童抑郁程度较低。本研究的结果表明,对于儿童来说,没有一种单一的应对策略是最好的,更有效的策略在很大程度上取决于欺凌受害的程度。研究结果还暗示,没有外部支持,儿童几乎不可能完全克服欺凌对他们自身的负面影响。