Zhang Xi, Liu Liqiong, Zhou Zihang, Qi Ming, Chen Ling
Humanities Research Institute, Medical College of Shihezi University, Shihezi, 832002, China.
Department of Nursing, National Cancer Centre/National Clinical Research Centre for Cancer/Cancer Hospital & Shenzhen Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Shenzhen, 518116, China.
Heliyon. 2024 Aug 31;10(17):e37201. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e37201. eCollection 2024 Sep 15.
Although studies in China have found that school bullying is prevalent among adolescents, most relevant research has focused on southern China, while research in northern China is limited. This study aimed to explore ethnic disparities in the socio-demographic determinants of school bullying in Inner Mongolia, a northern region of China.
A cross-sectional study was conducted among 2891 adolescents in Inner Mongolia, China, from September to December 2022. Data on participants' sociodemographic characteristics and school bullying experiences were collected through questionnaires. Multivariate logistic regression analyses, stratified by ethnicity, were employed to examine factors associated with school bullying. Furthermore, subgroup analyses and interaction tests were conducted to explore potential effect modifiers of the relationship between ethnicity and bullying.
The prevalence of school bullying was 18.99 % (549/2891) overall, with 17.96 % (420/2339) among Han and 23.37 % (129/552) among ethnic minorities. Minority adolescents faced a higher risk of bullying compared to Han ( = 1.35, : 1.08-1.69, < 0.05). Middle school students were more vulnerable to bullying than high school students ( = 1.25, :1.03-1.52, < 0.05). Among Han adolescents, having a mother with high school education was protective against bullying ( = 0.71, : 0.54-0.93, < 0.05), while it was an associated factor for minorities ( = 2.06, :1.23-3.46, < 0.05). Good family economic status was an associated factor for bullying among Han ( = 1.62, : 1.11-2.36, < 0.05), but not among minorities. Belonging to other family structures (remarriage/foster family, intergenerational families, live with relatives and elders) was an associated factor for minorities ( = 2.60, : 1.37-4.92, < 0.05), but not for Han. Subgroup analyses revealed significant ethnic disparities in bullying experiences among middle school students, those from nuclear family, other family, and fair economic backgrounds (all < 0.05). Interaction effects between ethnicity and these variables were not significant (all > 0.05).
This cross-sectional study has limitations in establishing causal relationships between identified associated factors and school bullying.
Ethnic minority adolescents in Inner Mongolia, China, especially middle school students, face a higher risk of school bullying than their Han peers. The differential impact of maternal education, family economic status, and family structure on bullying risk between Han and minority adolescents underscores the need for culturally sensitive, targeted interventions that consider the unique challenges faced by ethnic minority students.
尽管中国的研究发现校园欺凌在青少年中普遍存在,但大多数相关研究集中在中国南方,而中国北方的研究有限。本研究旨在探讨中国北方地区内蒙古校园欺凌的社会人口学决定因素中的民族差异。
2022年9月至12月,在中国内蒙古的2891名青少年中进行了一项横断面研究。通过问卷调查收集参与者的社会人口学特征和校园欺凌经历数据。采用按民族分层的多变量逻辑回归分析来检验与校园欺凌相关的因素。此外,进行亚组分析和交互作用检验以探索民族与欺凌之间关系的潜在效应修饰因素。
校园欺凌的总体发生率为18.99%(549/2891),汉族青少年中的发生率为17.96%(420/2339),少数民族青少年中的发生率为23.37%(129/552)。与汉族相比,少数民族青少年面临更高的欺凌风险(比值比=1.35,95%置信区间:1.08-1.69,P<0.05)。中学生比高中生更容易受到欺凌(比值比=1.25,95%置信区间:1.03-1.52,P<0.05)。在汉族青少年中,母亲具有高中学历可预防欺凌(比值比=0.71,95%置信区间:0.54-0.93,P<0.05),而这对少数民族青少年是一个相关因素(比值比=2.06,95%置信区间:1.23-至3.46,P<0.05)。良好的家庭经济状况是汉族青少年欺凌行为的一个相关因素(比值比=1.62,95%置信区间:1.11-2.36,P<0.05),但对少数民族青少年不是。属于其他家庭结构(再婚/寄养家庭、代际家庭、与亲属和长辈同住)是少数民族青少年欺凌行为的一个相关因素(比值比=2.60,95%置信区间:1.37-4.92,P<0.05),但对汉族青少年不是。亚组分析显示,在中学生、来自核心家庭、其他家庭和经济状况中等的青少年中,欺凌经历存在显著的民族差异(均P<0.05)。民族与这些变量之间的交互作用不显著(均P>0.05)。
这项横断面研究在确定已识别的相关因素与校园欺凌之间的因果关系方面存在局限性。
中国内蒙古的少数民族青少年,尤其是中学生,比汉族同龄人面临更高的校园欺凌风险。母亲教育程度、家庭经济状况和家庭结构对汉族和少数民族青少年欺凌风险的不同影响强调了需要开展具有文化敏感性的、有针对性的干预措施,以考虑少数民族学生面临的独特挑战。