• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

让服务不足的社区成员参与糖尿病自我管理:来自 YMCA 大里士满糖尿病控制项目的证据。

Engaging Underserved Community Members in Diabetes Self-Management: Evidence From the YMCA of Greater Richmond Diabetes Control Program.

机构信息

Population Studies Center, University of Michigan Institute for Social Research, Ann Arbor, Michigan.

Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Texas, El Paso, Texas.

出版信息

Diabetes Educ. 2020 Apr;46(2):169-180. doi: 10.1177/0145721720907059. Epub 2020 Mar 4.

DOI:10.1177/0145721720907059
PMID:32129157
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7813155/
Abstract

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to identify factors influencing participant engagement in a community-based diabetes self-management program (DSMP), with a focus on the needs of underserved groups (eg, racial/ethnic minorities, low income).

METHODS

Focus groups were conducted with participants (n = 22) from the YMCA of Greater Richmond's Diabetes Control Program, who were recruited using a purposeful sampling frame to capture a range of experiences. In-depth interviews were conducted with lay health coaches (n = 3). The RADaR qualitative analysis technique was used to identify themes related to factors across the continuum of engagement.

RESULTS

Fear affected program enrollment and retention in complex ways. Peers and coaches were important for social support and accountability. The length of the program (12 weeks), accessible information, practical skill building, and emphasis on making small, feasible improvements in pursuit of larger goals were identified as critical for engagement and improving diabetes self-management. Health and outside obligations were the major barriers to program attendance.

CONCLUSIONS

Participant and coach perspectives provide important insight into existing strengths of community-based DSMPs that can be expanded on to promote engagement as well as potential opportunities for improvement. Actionable recommendations for increasing engagement of underserved groups in community-based DSMPs are provided.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在确定影响参与者参与社区糖尿病自我管理计划(DSMP)的因素,重点关注服务不足群体(如少数民族、低收入群体)的需求。

方法

采用有针对性的抽样框架,从 YMCA of Greater Richmond 的糖尿病控制计划中招募了 22 名参与者(n=22),并对他们进行了焦点小组讨论。还对 3 名非专业健康教练(n=3)进行了深入访谈。使用 RADaR 定性分析技术,确定了与参与度连续体相关的主题。

结果

恐惧以复杂的方式影响着项目的参与和保留。同伴和教练在提供社会支持和问责方面非常重要。项目的长度(12 周)、可获得的信息、实用技能的培养,以及强调在追求更大目标的过程中进行小而可行的改进,被认为是参与和改善糖尿病自我管理的关键。健康和外部义务是参加项目的主要障碍。

结论

参与者和教练的观点提供了社区为基础的 DSMP 现有优势的重要见解,可以在此基础上进一步提高参与度,并为改进提供潜在机会。还提供了增加社区为基础的 DSMP 中服务不足群体参与度的可行建议。

相似文献

1
Engaging Underserved Community Members in Diabetes Self-Management: Evidence From the YMCA of Greater Richmond Diabetes Control Program.让服务不足的社区成员参与糖尿病自我管理:来自 YMCA 大里士满糖尿病控制项目的证据。
Diabetes Educ. 2020 Apr;46(2):169-180. doi: 10.1177/0145721720907059. Epub 2020 Mar 4.
2
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
3
Addressing Inequalities in Long Covid Healthcare: A Mixed-Methods Study on Building Inclusive Services.解决长期新冠医疗保健中的不平等问题:一项关于建立包容性服务的混合方法研究。
Health Expect. 2025 Aug;28(4):e70336. doi: 10.1111/hex.70336.
4
Successfully Managing Diabetes in a Community Setting: Evidence From the YMCA of Greater Richmond Diabetes Control Program.成功管理社区环境下的糖尿病:来自 YMCA 大里士满糖尿病控制项目的证据。
Diabetes Educ. 2018 Aug;44(4):383-394. doi: 10.1177/0145721718784265. Epub 2018 Jun 26.
5
Can We Enhance Shared Decision-making for Periacetabular Osteotomy Surgery? A Qualitative Study of Patient Experiences.我们能否加强髋臼周围截骨术的共同决策?一项关于患者体验的定性研究。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Jan 1;483(1):120-136. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003198. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
6
Consumers' and health providers' views and perceptions of partnering to improve health services design, delivery and evaluation: a co-produced qualitative evidence synthesis.消费者和卫生服务提供者对合作改善卫生服务设计、提供和评估的看法和认知:一项共同制定的定性证据综合研究。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Mar 14;3(3):CD013274. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013274.pub2.
7
Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of lay health worker programmes to improve access to maternal and child health: qualitative evidence synthesis.实施非专业卫生工作者项目以改善孕产妇和儿童健康服务可及性的障碍与促进因素:定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Oct 8;2013(10):CD010414. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010414.pub2.
8
Stakeholders' perceptions and experiences of factors influencing the commissioning, delivery, and uptake of general health checks: a qualitative evidence synthesis.利益相关者对影响一般健康检查的委托、提供和接受因素的看法与体验:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Mar 20;3(3):CD014796. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014796.pub2.
9
How diet modification challenges are magnified in vulnerable or marginalized people with diabetes and heart disease: a systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis.饮食调整挑战在患有糖尿病和心脏病的弱势群体或边缘化人群中如何被放大:一项系统评价与定性元分析
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2013 Sep 1;13(14):1-40. eCollection 2013.
10
Survivor, family and professional experiences of psychosocial interventions for sexual abuse and violence: a qualitative evidence synthesis.性虐待和暴力的心理社会干预的幸存者、家庭和专业人员的经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 4;10(10):CD013648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013648.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Acceptability of community health worker and peer supported interventions for ethnic minorities with type 2 diabetes: a qualitative systematic review.社区卫生工作者和同伴支持干预措施对少数民族2型糖尿病患者的可接受性:一项定性系统评价
Front Clin Diabetes Healthc. 2024 May 21;5:1306199. doi: 10.3389/fcdhc.2024.1306199. eCollection 2024.
2
Barriers and facilitators of self-management of diabetes amongst people experiencing socioeconomic deprivation: A systematic review and qualitative synthesis.经济社会地位剥夺人群中糖尿病自我管理的障碍和促进因素:系统评价和定性综合。
Health Expect. 2024 Jun;27(3):e14070. doi: 10.1111/hex.14070.
3
Current evidence for designing self-management support for underserved populations: an integrative review using the example of diabetes.针对服务不足人群的自我管理支持设计的现有证据:以糖尿病为例的综合评价。
Int J Equity Health. 2023 Sep 11;22(1):188. doi: 10.1186/s12939-023-01976-6.
4
Enrollment and Completion Characteristics for Novel Remote Delivery Modes of the Self-management Programs During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Exploratory Analysis.2019年冠状病毒病大流行期间自我管理项目新型远程交付模式的招募与完成特征:探索性分析
JMIR Form Res. 2022 Nov 30;6(11):e38357. doi: 10.2196/38357.

本文引用的文献

1
Medical Mistrust, Racism, and Delays in Preventive Health Screening Among African-American Men.非裔美国男性的医疗不信任、种族主义和预防性健康筛查延迟。
Behav Med. 2019 Apr-Jun;45(2):102-117. doi: 10.1080/08964289.2019.1585327.
2
CONSENSUS STATEMENT BY THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGISTS AND AMERICAN COLLEGE OF ENDOCRINOLOGY ON THE COMPREHENSIVE TYPE 2 DIABETES MANAGEMENT ALGORITHM - 2019 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.美国临床内分泌医师协会和美国内分泌学会关于2型糖尿病综合管理算法 - 2019执行摘要的共识声明。
Endocr Pract. 2019 Jan;25(1):69-100. doi: 10.4158/CS-2018-0535.
3
Successfully Managing Diabetes in a Community Setting: Evidence From the YMCA of Greater Richmond Diabetes Control Program.成功管理社区环境下的糖尿病:来自 YMCA 大里士满糖尿病控制项目的证据。
Diabetes Educ. 2018 Aug;44(4):383-394. doi: 10.1177/0145721718784265. Epub 2018 Jun 26.
4
Diabetes structured self-management education programmes: a narrative review and current innovations.糖尿病结构化自我管理教育计划:叙述性综述与当前创新
Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2018 Feb;6(2):130-142. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(17)30239-5. Epub 2017 Sep 29.
5
Diabetes Self-management Education and Support in Type 2 Diabetes.2型糖尿病的糖尿病自我管理教育与支持
Diabetes Educ. 2017 Feb;43(1):40-53. doi: 10.1177/0145721716689694.
6
Distrust and patients in intercultural healthcare: A qualitative interview study.不信任与跨文化医疗保健中的患者:一项定性访谈研究。
Nurs Ethics. 2018 May;25(3):313-323. doi: 10.1177/0969733016652449. Epub 2016 Jun 9.
7
Diabetes self-management education for adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A systematic review of the effect on glycemic control.2型糖尿病成人患者的糖尿病自我管理教育:对血糖控制影响的系统评价
Patient Educ Couns. 2016 Jun;99(6):926-43. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2015.11.003. Epub 2015 Nov 22.
8
(4) Foundations of care: education, nutrition, physical activity, smoking cessation, psychosocial care, and immunization.(4)护理基础:教育、营养、体育活动、戒烟、心理社会护理和免疫接种。
Diabetes Care. 2015 Jan;38 Suppl:S20-30. doi: 10.2337/dc15-S007.
9
US trends in receipt of appropriate diabetes clinical and self-care from 2001 to 2010 and racial/ethnic disparities in care.2001年至2010年美国接受适当糖尿病临床治疗和自我护理的趋势以及护理中的种族/民族差异。
Diabetes Educ. 2014 Nov-Dec;40(6):756-66. doi: 10.1177/0145721714546721. Epub 2014 Aug 20.
10
Challenging recruitment of youth with type 2 diabetes into clinical trials.将2型糖尿病青年患者纳入临床试验面临挑战。
J Adolesc Health. 2014 Mar;54(3):247-54. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2013.08.017. Epub 2013 Oct 23.