• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在线支持小组能否解决癌症患者的心理病态?基于人工智能的前列腺癌轨迹研究。

Can online support groups address psychological morbidity of cancer patients? An artificial intelligence based investigation of prostate cancer trajectories.

机构信息

Research Centre for Data Analytics and Cognition, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia.

MD Anderson Cancer Center, University of Texas, Houston, Texas.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2020 Mar 4;15(3):e0229361. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229361. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0229361
PMID:32130256
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7055800/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Online Cancer Support Groups (OCSG) are becoming an increasingly vital source of information, experiences and empowerment for patients with cancer. Despite significant contributions to physical, psychological and emotional wellbeing of patients, OCSG are yet to be formally recognised and used in multidisciplinary cancer support programs. This study highlights the opportunity of using Artificial Intelligence (AI) in OCSG to address psychological morbidity, with supporting empirical evidence from prostate cancer (PCa) patients.

METHODS

A validated framework of AI techniques and Natural Language Processing (NLP) methods, was used to investigate PCa patient activities based on conversations in ten international OCSG (18,496 patients- 277,805 conversations). The specific focus was on activities that indicate psychological morbidity; the reasons for joining OCSG, deep emotions and the variation from joining through to milestones in the cancer trajectory. Comparative analyses were conducted using t-tests, One-way ANOVA and Tukey-Kramer post-hoc analysis.

FINDINGS

PCa patients joined OCSG at four key phases of psychological distress; diagnosis, treatment, side-effects, and recurrence, the majority group was 'treatment' (61.72%). The four groups varied in expression of the intense emotional burden of cancer. The 'side-effects' group expressed increased negative emotions during the first month compared to other groups (p<0.01). A comparison of pre-treatment vs post-treatment emotions showed that joining pre-treatment had significantly lower negative emotions after 12-months compared to post-treatment (p<0.05). Long-term deep emotion analysis reveals that all groups except 'recurrence' improved in emotional wellbeing.

CONCLUSION

This is the first empirical study of psychological morbidity and deep emotions expressed by men with a new diagnosis of cancer, using AI. PCa patients joining pre-treatment had improved emotions, and long-term participation in OCSG led to an increase in emotional wellbeing, indicating a decrease in psychological distress. It is opportune to further investigate AI in OCSG for early psychological intervention as an adjunct to conventional intervention programs.

摘要

背景

在线癌症支持团体(OCSG)正成为癌症患者获取信息、经验和赋权的日益重要的来源。尽管它们对患者的身心健康有重大贡献,但 OCSG 尚未在多学科癌症支持计划中得到正式认可和应用。本研究强调了在 OCSG 中使用人工智能(AI)来解决心理困扰的机会,并提供了来自前列腺癌(PCa)患者的支持性实证证据。

方法

使用经过验证的 AI 技术和自然语言处理(NLP)方法框架,根据十个国际 OCSG(18496 名患者-277805 次对话)中的对话,研究 PCa 患者的活动。重点关注表明心理困扰的活动;加入 OCSG 的原因、深层情绪以及从加入到癌症轨迹里程碑的变化。使用 t 检验、单向方差分析和 Tukey-Kramer 事后分析进行比较分析。

结果

PCa 患者在四个关键的心理困扰阶段加入 OCSG;诊断、治疗、副作用和复发,大多数患者处于“治疗”(61.72%)阶段。四个组在癌症的强烈情绪负担方面存在差异。“副作用”组在第一个月表达的负面情绪比其他组更高(p<0.01)。治疗前与治疗后情绪的比较表明,治疗前组在 12 个月后与治疗后组相比,负面情绪显著降低(p<0.05)。长期深入的情绪分析表明,除“复发”组外,所有组的情绪健康状况都有所改善。

结论

这是第一项使用人工智能研究新诊断为癌症的男性表达的心理困扰和深层情绪的实证研究。治疗前加入的 PCa 患者情绪有所改善,长期参与 OCSG 导致情绪健康状况增加,表明心理困扰减少。有必要进一步研究 OCSG 中的 AI 作为传统干预计划的辅助手段,进行早期心理干预。

相似文献

1
Can online support groups address psychological morbidity of cancer patients? An artificial intelligence based investigation of prostate cancer trajectories.在线支持小组能否解决癌症患者的心理病态?基于人工智能的前列腺癌轨迹研究。
PLoS One. 2020 Mar 4;15(3):e0229361. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229361. eCollection 2020.
2
The Patient-Reported Information Multidimensional Exploration (PRIME) Framework for Investigating Emotions and Other Factors of Prostate Cancer Patients with Low Intermediate Risk Based on Online Cancer Support Group Discussions.基于在线癌症支持小组讨论调查低中危前列腺癌患者情绪和其他因素的患者报告信息多维探索(PRIME)框架。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2018 Jun;25(6):1737-1745. doi: 10.1245/s10434-018-6372-2. Epub 2018 Feb 21.
3
Machine learning to support social media empowered patients in cancer care and cancer treatment decisions.机器学习支持社交媒体赋能的癌症患者在癌症护理和治疗决策中。
PLoS One. 2018 Oct 18;13(10):e0205855. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0205855. eCollection 2018.
4
Emotions of COVID-19: Content Analysis of Self-Reported Information Using Artificial Intelligence.COVID-19 情绪:使用人工智能进行自我报告信息的内容分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Apr 30;23(4):e27341. doi: 10.2196/27341.
5
Robotic-assisted vs. open radical prostatectomy: A machine learning framework for intelligent analysis of patient-reported outcomes from online cancer support groups.机器人辅助与开放性根治性前列腺切除术:一个用于智能分析在线癌症支持小组中患者报告结果的机器学习框架。
Urol Oncol. 2018 Dec;36(12):529.e1-529.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2018.08.012. Epub 2018 Sep 17.
6
Preliminary results of a randomised controlled trial of an online psychological intervention to reduce distress in men treated for localised prostate cancer.一项针对接受局部前列腺癌治疗的男性的在线心理干预以减轻痛苦的随机对照试验的初步结果。
Eur Urol. 2015 Sep;68(3):471-9. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.10.024. Epub 2014 Oct 28.
7
Emotional approach coping and the effects of online peer-led support group participation among patients with breast cancer: a longitudinal study.情感应对方式以及在线同伴主导的支持小组参与对乳腺癌患者的影响:一项纵向研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2014 Nov 28;16(11):e256. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3517.
8
'You're putting thoughts into my head': a qualitative study of the readiness of patients with breast, lung or prostate cancer to address emotional needs through the first 18 months after diagnosis.“你在我的脑海中植入了想法”:一项定性研究,探讨了乳腺癌、肺癌或前列腺癌患者在诊断后最初 18 个月内通过何种方式准备好应对自身的情绪需求。
Psychooncology. 2013 Jun;22(6):1402-10. doi: 10.1002/pon.3156. Epub 2012 Aug 14.
9
Emotional coping differences among breast cancer patients from an online support group: a cross-sectional study.来自一个在线支持小组的乳腺癌患者的情绪应对差异:一项横断面研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2014 Feb 5;16(2):e28. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2831.
10
Natural Language Processing-Based Virtual Cofacilitator for Online Cancer Support Groups: Protocol for an Algorithm Development and Validation Study.基于自然语言处理的在线癌症支持小组虚拟协同 facilitator:算法开发与验证研究方案。 注:这里“cofacilitator”不太明确准确的中文对应词,暂保留英文,也可根据实际语境灵活调整表述,比如“共同促进者”等 。
JMIR Res Protoc. 2021 Jan 7;10(1):e21453. doi: 10.2196/21453.

引用本文的文献

1
Digital technology as a tool to provide social support to individuals with cancer in low- and middle-income countries: A scoping review.数字技术作为向低收入和中等收入国家癌症患者提供社会支持的工具:一项范围综述。
PLOS Digit Health. 2025 Apr 21;4(4):e0000609. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000609. eCollection 2025 Apr.
2
The Challenges of Gender Diversity in Boards of Directors: An Australian Study with Global Implications.董事会中性别多元化的挑战:一项具有全球影响的澳大利亚研究。
Glob Chall. 2024 Dec 25;9(2):2400259. doi: 10.1002/gch2.202400259. eCollection 2025 Feb.
3
ChatGPT and generative AI in urology and surgery-A narrative review.

本文引用的文献

1
Machine learning to support social media empowered patients in cancer care and cancer treatment decisions.机器学习支持社交媒体赋能的癌症患者在癌症护理和治疗决策中。
PLoS One. 2018 Oct 18;13(10):e0205855. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0205855. eCollection 2018.
2
ASO Author Reflections: Enabling Optimised Delivery of Patient-Centred Cancer Care Using Artificial Intelligence and Data Analytics.ASO作者反思:利用人工智能和数据分析实现以患者为中心的癌症护理的优化提供。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2018 Dec;25(Suppl 3):980-981. doi: 10.1245/s10434-018-6917-4. Epub 2018 Oct 15.
3
Robotic-assisted vs. open radical prostatectomy: A machine learning framework for intelligent analysis of patient-reported outcomes from online cancer support groups.
ChatGPT与生成式人工智能在泌尿外科及外科领域的叙述性综述
BJUI Compass. 2024 Jul 25;5(9):813-821. doi: 10.1002/bco2.390. eCollection 2024 Sep.
4
Research progress on the psychological burden and intervention measures in cancer patients.癌症患者心理负担及干预措施的研究进展
Front Psychiatry. 2024 Jun 13;15:1408762. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1408762. eCollection 2024.
5
What is the economic and social return on investment for telephone cancer information and support services in Australia? An evaluative social return on investment study protocol.澳大利亚电话癌症信息和支持服务的投资经济和社会效益回报是什么?一项评估性社会投资回报研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Jun 25;14(6):e081425. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081425.
6
Use of sentiment analysis for capturing hospitalized cancer patients' experience from free-text comments in the Persian language.使用情感分析捕捉波斯语中住院癌症患者的自由文本评论中的体验。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2023 Nov 29;23(1):275. doi: 10.1186/s12911-023-02358-2.
7
Mental Health of Prostate Cancer Patients: Content Review on YouTube.前列腺癌患者的心理健康:YouTube 内容回顾。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Mar 7;20(6):4721. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20064721.
8
An artificial intelligence life cycle: From conception to production.人工智能生命周期:从概念到产品。
Patterns (N Y). 2022 Apr 13;3(6):100489. doi: 10.1016/j.patter.2022.100489. eCollection 2022 Jun 10.
9
A Mental Health Chatbot with Cognitive Skills for Personalised Behavioural Activation and Remote Health Monitoring.具有认知技能的心理健康聊天机器人,用于个性化行为激活和远程健康监测。
Sensors (Basel). 2022 May 11;22(10):3653. doi: 10.3390/s22103653.
10
Prostate Cancer Support Groups: The Unadvertised Camaraderie.前列腺癌支持小组:未被宣扬的情谊。
Cureus. 2021 Sep 23;13(9):e18208. doi: 10.7759/cureus.18208. eCollection 2021 Sep.
机器人辅助与开放性根治性前列腺切除术:一个用于智能分析在线癌症支持小组中患者报告结果的机器学习框架。
Urol Oncol. 2018 Dec;36(12):529.e1-529.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2018.08.012. Epub 2018 Sep 17.
4
The Patient-Reported Information Multidimensional Exploration (PRIME) Framework for Investigating Emotions and Other Factors of Prostate Cancer Patients with Low Intermediate Risk Based on Online Cancer Support Group Discussions.基于在线癌症支持小组讨论调查低中危前列腺癌患者情绪和其他因素的患者报告信息多维探索(PRIME)框架。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2018 Jun;25(6):1737-1745. doi: 10.1245/s10434-018-6372-2. Epub 2018 Feb 21.
5
Men don't talk about their health, but will they CHAT? The potential of online holistic needs assessment in prostate cancer.男性不谈自己的健康状况,但他们会进行交流吗?前列腺癌在线整体需求评估的潜力。
BJU Int. 2018 Apr;121(4):494-496. doi: 10.1111/bju.14114. Epub 2018 Jan 22.
6
A novel framework for automated, intelligent extraction and analysis of online support group discussions for cancer related outcomes.一种用于自动、智能提取和分析癌症相关结果的在线支持小组讨论的新颖框架。
BJU Int. 2017 Nov;120 Suppl 3:59-61. doi: 10.1111/bju.14036.
7
Psychological distress in men with prostate cancer and their partners before and after cancer diagnosis: a longitudinal study.前列腺癌男性患者及其伴侣在癌症诊断前后的心理困扰:一项纵向研究。
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2017 Aug 1;47(8):735-742. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyx066.
8
Robotic vs. Retropubic radical prostatectomy in prostate cancer: A systematic review and an meta-analysis update.机器人辅助与耻骨后根治性前列腺切除术治疗前列腺癌:系统评价与Meta分析更新
Oncotarget. 2017 May 9;8(19):32237-32257. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.13332.
9
Robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy versus open radical retropubic prostatectomy: early outcomes from a randomised controlled phase 3 study.机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺切除术与开放式经耻骨后前列腺根治术的比较:一项随机对照 3 期研究的早期结果。
Lancet. 2016 Sep 10;388(10049):1057-1066. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30592-X. Epub 2016 Jul 26.
10
Urinary Incontinence and Erectile Dysfunction After Robotic Versus Open Radical Prostatectomy: A Prospective, Controlled, Nonrandomised Trial.机器人辅助与开放性根治性前列腺切除术治疗后尿失禁和勃起功能障碍:一项前瞻性、对照、非随机试验。
Eur Urol. 2015 Aug;68(2):216-25. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.02.029. Epub 2015 Mar 12.