Suppr超能文献

机器人辅助与开放性根治性前列腺切除术:一个用于智能分析在线癌症支持小组中患者报告结果的机器学习框架。

Robotic-assisted vs. open radical prostatectomy: A machine learning framework for intelligent analysis of patient-reported outcomes from online cancer support groups.

作者信息

Ranasinghe Weranja, de Silva Daswin, Bandaragoda Tharindu, Adikari Achini, Alahakoon Damminda, Persad Raj, Lawrentschuk Nathan, Bolton Damien

机构信息

University of Melbourne, Department of Surgery, Austin Hospital, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia.

Research Centre for Data Analytics and Cognition, La Trobe University, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

Urol Oncol. 2018 Dec;36(12):529.e1-529.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2018.08.012. Epub 2018 Sep 17.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The advantages of Robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RARP) over open radical prostatectomy (ORP) in Prostate cancer perioperatively are well-established, but quality of life is more contentious. Increasingly, patients are utilising online cancer support groups (OCSG) to express themselves. Currently there is no method of analysis of these sophisticated data sources. We have used the PRIME-2 (Patient Reported Information Multidimensional Exploration version 2) framework for automated identification and intelligent analysis of decision-making, functional and emotional outcomes in men undergoing ORP vs. RARP from OCSG discussions.

METHODS

The PRIME-2 framework was developed to retrospectively analyse individualised patient-reported information from 5,157 patients undergoing RARP and 579 ORP. The decision factors, side effects, and emotions in 2 groups were analysed and compared using Chi-squared, t tests, and Pearson correlation.

RESULTS

There were no differences in Gleason score, Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA), and age between the groups. Surgeon experience and preservation of erectile function (P < 0.01) were important factors in the decision making process. There were no significant differences in urinary, sexual, or bowel symptoms between ORP and RARP on a monthly basis during the initial 12 months. Emotions expressed by patients undergoing RARP were more consistent and positive while ORP expressed more negative emotions at the time of surgery and 3 months postsurgery (P < 0.05), due to pain and discomfort, and during ninth month due to fear and anxiety of pending PSA tests.

CONCLUSIONS

ORP and RARP demonstrated similar side effect profiles for 12 months, but PRIME-2 enables identification of important quality of life features and emotions over time. It is timely for clinicians to accept OCSG as an adjunct to Prostate cancer care.

摘要

背景

机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺切除术(RARP)在前列腺癌围手术期相对于开放性根治性前列腺切除术(ORP)的优势已得到充分证实,但生活质量方面存在更多争议。越来越多的患者利用在线癌症支持小组(OCSG)来表达自己的想法。目前尚无分析这些复杂数据源的方法。我们使用PRIME-2(患者报告信息多维探索版本2)框架,对来自OCSG讨论中接受ORP与RARP手术的男性患者的决策、功能和情感结果进行自动识别和智能分析。

方法

开发PRIME-2框架以回顾性分析5157例接受RARP手术和579例接受ORP手术患者的个体化患者报告信息。使用卡方检验、t检验和Pearson相关性分析并比较两组的决策因素、副作用和情绪。

结果

两组之间的Gleason评分、前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)和年龄无差异。外科医生经验和勃起功能的保留(P < 0.01)是决策过程中的重要因素。在最初的12个月中,ORP和RARP在每月的泌尿、性或肠道症状方面无显著差异。接受RARP手术的患者所表达的情绪更为一致和积极,而接受ORP手术的患者在手术时和术后3个月表达了更多负面情绪(P < 0.05),这是由于疼痛和不适,在第9个月则是由于对即将到来的PSA检测的恐惧和焦虑。

结论

ORP和RARP在12个月内显示出相似的副作用情况,但PRIME-2能够随着时间推移识别重要的生活质量特征和情绪。临床医生应及时将OCSG作为前列腺癌护理的辅助手段。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验