Renal Division, Department of Internal Medicine, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
PLoS One. 2020 Mar 4;15(3):e0229722. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229722. eCollection 2020.
Malnutrition is prevalent in patients on dialysis and is associated with morbidity and mortality. Nutritional status can be assessed by a variety of biochemical and physical parameters or nutritional assessment scores. Most of these methods are expensive or cumbersome to use and are not suitable for routine repetitive follow-up in dialysis patients. The Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA) has a short form screening set (MNA-SF), which would be suitable as a screening tool, but has not been validated yet in dialysis patients. We aimed to assess whether the MNA is an appropriate tool for identifying nutritional problems in dialysis patients.
MNA, routine biochemistry, physical parameters, comorbidities were assessed in cross-sectional multicentric cohorts of hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis patients with a longitudinal follow up of 2 years for mortality.
In this cohort of 216 patients, mortality was 27.3% at a follow up of 750±350 days. The mean MNA-SF score was 9.9±1.8, with 30.1%, 59.3% and 10.6% of patients categorized as having normal nutritional status, at risk for malnutrition and malnourished, respectively. The screening score was associated with mortality (HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.75-0.98 per point). With normal nutrition as reference, adjusted mortality was 2.50 (95% CI 1.16-5.37) and 3.89 (95% CI 1.48-10.13) for patients at risk for malnutrition and with malnutrition, respectively. After recalibrating the MNA full score for the specificity of some of its domains for dialysis patients, the MNA-SF had a good sensitivity and specificity for not being well nourished (0.95 and 0.63 respectively) in the full score, and a high negative predictive value (0.91).
The MNA-SF is independently associated with 2 year mortality in dialysis patients. It has a high negative predictive value for excluding being at risk or having malnutrition in the full score. Therefore, it can be advocated as a screening tool for nutritional status in dialysis patients.
营养不良在透析患者中很常见,与发病率和死亡率有关。营养状况可以通过各种生化和物理参数或营养评估评分来评估。这些方法大多数都很昂贵或使用起来很麻烦,不适合在透析患者中进行常规重复随访。迷你营养评估(MNA)有一个简短的筛选集(MNA-SF),它可以作为一种筛选工具,但尚未在透析患者中得到验证。我们旨在评估 MNA 是否是一种识别透析患者营养问题的合适工具。
在血液透析和腹膜透析患者的横断面多中心队列中评估 MNA、常规生化、物理参数、合并症,并进行 2 年的死亡率纵向随访。
在这 216 名患者的队列中,随访 750±350 天后死亡率为 27.3%。MNA-SF 评分的平均值为 9.9±1.8,分别有 30.1%、59.3%和 10.6%的患者被归类为营养状况正常、存在营养不良风险和营养不良。筛查评分与死亡率相关(每点 HR 0.86,95%CI 0.75-0.98)。以营养正常为参考,调整后的死亡率分别为存在营养不良风险的患者为 2.50(95%CI 1.16-5.37)和 3.89(95%CI 1.48-10.13)。在为透析患者的某些领域的特异性重新校准 MNA 总分后,MNA-SF 对营养状况不佳(总分分别为 0.95 和 0.63)具有良好的敏感性和特异性,且阴性预测值较高(0.91)。
MNA-SF 与透析患者 2 年死亡率独立相关。在总分中,它对排除存在营养不良风险或营养不良具有较高的阴性预测值。因此,它可以作为透析患者营养状况的筛选工具。