Suppr超能文献

[针刺与物理治疗对非卧床膝骨关节炎患者的疗效比较]

[Comparison of the effectiveness of acupuncture and physical therapy in ambulatory patients with gonarthrosis].

作者信息

Ammer K, Petschnig R

机构信息

Ludwig-Boltzmann-Forschungsstelle für physikalische Diagnostik, Wien.

出版信息

Wien Med Wochenschr. 1988 Nov 30;138(22):566-9.

PMID:3213064
Abstract

A comparative study between acupuncture and physical therapy in patients with gonarthrosis is reported. Patients treated with physical therapy showed 4 parameters significantly reduced after a treatment duration of 2 weeks, and 7 out of 10 parameters after 4 weeks of therapy. Acupuncture could better 2 parameters but only after 4 weeks of treatment. Although physical therapy was superior in most of the objective measurements, the subjective judgement by the patients of the efficacy of both treatments found no significant difference. In summary acupuncture is thought to be only an additional form of treatment in gonarthrosis.

摘要

本文报道了一项关于膝关节病患者针灸与物理治疗的对比研究。接受物理治疗的患者在治疗2周后,有4项指标显著降低,治疗4周后,10项指标中有7项显著降低。针灸仅在治疗4周后能使2项指标得到改善。虽然在大多数客观测量中物理治疗更具优势,但患者对两种治疗效果的主观评价没有显著差异。总之,针灸被认为只是膝关节病的一种辅助治疗方式。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验