• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

智能手机是否会对面对面互动产生协调问题?利用博弈论理解和解决智能手机困境

Do Smartphones Create a Coordination Problem for Face-to-Face Interaction? Leveraging Game Theory to Understand and Solve the Smartphone Dilemma.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Arizona State University, 950 S. McAllister Ave, Tempe, AZ, 85287, USA.

Cardiff University, School of Computer Science & Informatics, 5 The Parade, Cardiff, CF24 3AA, UK.

出版信息

Bioessays. 2020 Apr;42(4):e1800261. doi: 10.1002/bies.201800261. Epub 2020 Mar 4.

DOI:10.1002/bies.201800261
PMID:32130740
Abstract

Smartphone use changes the landscape of social interactions, including introducing new social dilemmas to daily life. The challenge of putting down one's smartphone is an example of a classic coordination problem from game theory: the stag hunt game. In a stag hunt game, there are two possible coordination points, one that involves big payoffs for both partners (e.g., working together to hunt large game like stag) and one that involves smaller payoffs for both partners (e.g., individually hunting small game like rabbits) but is safer because it does not require that your partner choose that option as well. This is similar to the challenges of putting down smartphones to have a face-to-face interaction: you and your interaction partner might both prefer the higher payoff option of having a face-to-face interaction, but neither of you wants to put down your phone and risk not having anything to do in the meantime. It is also discussed how new technological innovations are changing the payoffs of face-to-face conversation versus side-by-side smartphone scrolling. Insights that come from applying game theory to this "social media dilemma" are discussed here and potential solutions that come out of a game theoretic analysis are offered. Also see the video abstract here https://youtu.be/9esL578zM-E.

摘要

智能手机的使用改变了社交互动的格局,包括给日常生活带来新的社交困境。放下智能手机的挑战是博弈论中一个经典协调问题的例子:猎鹿博弈。在猎鹿博弈中,有两个可能的协调点,一个涉及到双方的高收益(例如,共同努力猎取大型猎物,如鹿),另一个涉及到双方的较小收益(例如,各自猎取小型猎物,如兔子),但更安全,因为它不需要你的伙伴也选择这个选项。这类似于放下智能手机进行面对面互动的挑战:你和你的互动伙伴可能都更喜欢面对面互动的高收益选择,但你们谁也不想放下手机,同时冒着没有事情可做的风险。本文还讨论了新技术创新如何改变面对面交谈与并排刷手机的收益。本文从博弈论的角度探讨了这个“社交媒体困境”,并提出了博弈分析得出的潜在解决方案。也可在此处观看视频摘要:https://youtu.be/9esL578zM-E。

相似文献

1
Do Smartphones Create a Coordination Problem for Face-to-Face Interaction? Leveraging Game Theory to Understand and Solve the Smartphone Dilemma.智能手机是否会对面对面互动产生协调问题?利用博弈论理解和解决智能手机困境
Bioessays. 2020 Apr;42(4):e1800261. doi: 10.1002/bies.201800261. Epub 2020 Mar 4.
2
Human and macaque pairs employ different coordination strategies in a transparent decision game.在透明决策游戏中,人类和猕猴对使用不同的协调策略。
Elife. 2023 Jan 12;12:e81641. doi: 10.7554/eLife.81641.
3
Coordination strategies of chimpanzees and human children in a Stag Hunt game.黑猩猩与人类儿童在猎鹿博弈中的协调策略
Proc Biol Sci. 2014 Dec 7;281(1796):20141973. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2014.1973.
4
Sparse cliques trump scale-free networks in coordination and competition.稀疏聚类在协调和竞争中胜过无标度网络。
Sci Rep. 2016 Feb 22;6:21870. doi: 10.1038/srep21870.
5
Effects of conformism on the cultural evolution of social behaviour.从众效应对社会行为文化进化的影响。
PLoS One. 2013 Jul 10;8(7):e68153. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0068153. Print 2013.
6
Preferential partner selection in an evolutionary study of Prisoner's Dilemma.囚徒困境进化研究中的偏好性伙伴选择
Biosystems. 1996;37(1-2):99-125. doi: 10.1016/0303-2647(95)01548-5.
7
Stags, Hawks, and Doves: Social Evolution Theory and Individual Variation in Cooperation.雄鹿、鹰派与鸽派:社会进化理论与合作中的个体差异
Integr Comp Biol. 2017 Sep 1;57(3):566-579. doi: 10.1093/icb/icx071.
8
Evolutionary prisoner's dilemma on evolving random networks.演化随机网络上的进化囚徒困境
Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2014 Apr;89(4):042142. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.89.042142. Epub 2014 Apr 28.
9
Intuition and Deliberation in the Stag Hunt Game.猎鹿博弈中的直觉与深思熟虑。
Sci Rep. 2019 Oct 16;9(1):14833. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-50556-8.
10
Applying principles from the game theory to acute stroke care: Learning from the prisoner's dilemma, stag-hunt, and other strategies.将博弈论原理应用于急性中风护理:从囚徒困境、猎鹿博弈及其他策略中学习。
Int J Stroke. 2016 Apr;11(3):274-86. doi: 10.1177/1747493016631725. Epub 2016 Feb 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Construction of Internet Business Innovation Network Model and Data Image Research under the Background of Game Theory.基于博弈论的互联网商务创新网络模型构建与数据影像研究
Comput Intell Neurosci. 2022 Jan 6;2022:8804272. doi: 10.1155/2022/8804272. eCollection 2022.