• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

玻璃体切除术联合或不联合内界膜剥除治疗近视性黄斑劈裂。

Vitrectomy with or without internal limiting membrane peeling for myopic foveoschisis.

机构信息

Department of Retinal & Vitreous Diseases, Chongqing Aier-Mega Eye Hospital, Aier Medical Group, 288 Nanchen Street, Chongqing, 400060, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

BMC Ophthalmol. 2020 Mar 4;20(1):83. doi: 10.1186/s12886-020-01354-8.

DOI:10.1186/s12886-020-01354-8
PMID:32131776
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7055105/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to compare the anatomical and visual outcomes of vitrectomy with or without internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling for symptomatic myopic foveoschisis (MF).

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study of patients who had undergone vitrectomy for symptomatic MF at our specialist ophthalmology department in China. Cases were retrospectively categorized into one of two cohorts, depending on whether or not they had undergone ILM peeling (ILMP) during their surgery. Over a mean follow-up period of 18 months, all eyes underwent repeated examinations, including best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and optical coherence tomographic (OCT) recordings, particularly focusing on central foveal thickness (CFT), macular hole (MH) formation and/or foveal detachment (FD).

RESULTS

We included 32 eyes (32 patients) with mean age of 62.2 ± 7.4 years. 31 patients (96.8%) were female. There were 21 eyes in the ILMP cohort and 11 eyes in the non-ILMP cohort. There were no significant preoperative differences in age, axial length, symptom duration or postoperative follow-up period between the two cohorts. MF was resolved completely in all of the eyes except one eye in the ILMP cohort. The postoperative CFT was significantly reduced compared to the preoperative baseline in both cohorts (469 ± 203 μm to 253 ± 56 μm; p = 0.003 in no-ILMP; 495 ± 178 μm to 244 ± 63 μm; p <  0.001 in ILMP, respectively). The final BCVA improved significantly in non-ILMP (1.27 ± 0.63 logMAR to 0.73 ± 0.55 logMAR; p = 0.021); but not significantly in ILMP cohort (1.25 ± 0.51 to 0.98 ± 0.57 logMAR; p = 0.143).

CONCLUSION

Vitrectomy, either with or without ILM peeling, results in a significant anatomical improvement in eyes with MF. Eyes treated by vitrectomy may have a better visual improvement when ILM was not peeled.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在比较玻璃体切割术联合或不联合内界膜(ILM)剥除治疗症状性近视性黄斑劈裂(MF)的解剖学和视觉结果。

方法

本研究为中国某眼科专科医院进行的回顾性队列研究,纳入了接受玻璃体切割术治疗症状性 MF 的患者。根据手术中是否进行 ILM 剥除(ILMP),将病例分为两组。在平均 18 个月的随访期间,所有患者均接受了多次检查,包括最佳矫正视力(BCVA)和光学相干断层扫描(OCT)记录,特别关注中心凹视网膜厚度(CFT)、黄斑裂孔(MH)形成和/或中心凹脱离(FD)。

结果

共纳入 32 只眼(32 例),平均年龄为 62.2±7.4 岁,31 例(96.8%)为女性。ILMP 组 21 只眼,非 ILMP 组 11 只眼。两组间患者年龄、眼轴长度、症状持续时间和术后随访时间无显著差异。除 ILMP 组 1 只眼外,所有患者的 MF 均完全消退。两组术后 CFT 均较术前明显降低(非 ILMP 组:469±203μm 至 253±56μm;p=0.003;ILMP 组:495±178μm 至 244±63μm;p<0.001)。非 ILMP 组最终 BCVA 明显改善(1.27±0.63 logMAR 至 0.73±0.55 logMAR;p=0.021),而 ILMP 组则无明显改善(1.25±0.51 至 0.98±0.57 logMAR;p=0.143)。

结论

玻璃体切割术联合或不联合 ILM 剥除均可显著改善 MF 患者的解剖学结果。未行 ILM 剥除的玻璃体切割术治疗眼视力改善可能更好。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7022/7055105/fd3de59fbe1b/12886_2020_1354_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7022/7055105/ecf978c7e2d1/12886_2020_1354_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7022/7055105/fd3de59fbe1b/12886_2020_1354_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7022/7055105/ecf978c7e2d1/12886_2020_1354_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7022/7055105/fd3de59fbe1b/12886_2020_1354_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Vitrectomy with or without internal limiting membrane peeling for myopic foveoschisis.玻璃体切除术联合或不联合内界膜剥除治疗近视性黄斑劈裂。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2020 Mar 4;20(1):83. doi: 10.1186/s12886-020-01354-8.
2
Fovea-sparing internal limiting membrane peeling versus complete internal limiting membrane peeling for myopic traction maculopathy.保留中心凹的内界膜剥除术与完全内界膜剥除术治疗近视牵拉性黄斑病变的比较。
Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2020 Jan;64(1):13-21. doi: 10.1007/s10384-019-00696-1. Epub 2019 Nov 4.
3
Efficacy of non-fovea-sparing ILM peeling for symptomatic myopic foveoschisis with and without macular hole.非中心凹保留内界膜剥除术治疗有和无黄斑孔的症状性近视性黄斑劈裂。
Br J Ophthalmol. 2019 Feb;103(2):257-263. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2017-311775. Epub 2018 Apr 30.
4
Alterations of Foveal Architecture during Vitrectomy for Myopic Retinoschisis Identified by Intraoperative Optical Coherence Tomography.术中光学相干断层扫描发现近视性视网膜劈裂行玻璃体切割术后黄斑区结构改变。
Ophthalmologica. 2019;242(2):87-97. doi: 10.1159/000500362. Epub 2019 Jun 14.
5
Comparison of effectiveness between complete internal limiting membrane peeling and internal limiting membrane peeling with preservation of the central fovea in combination with 25G vitrectomy for the treatment of high myopic foveoschisis.完全内界膜剥除术与保留中央凹的内界膜剥除联合25G玻璃体切除术治疗高度近视性黄斑劈裂的疗效比较
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Mar;98(9):e14710. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000014710.
6
Factors correlated with postoperative visual acuity after vitrectomy and internal limiting membrane peeling for myopic foveoschisis.玻璃体切割联合内界膜剥除治疗近视性黄斑劈裂术后视力相关因素分析。
Retina. 2010 Jun;30(6):874-80. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0b013e3181c703fc.
7
Efficiency comparison with fovea-sparing internal limiting membrane peeling and complete internal limiting membrane peeling for treating myopic traction maculopathy.保留中心凹内界膜剥除与完全内界膜剥除治疗近视性牵引性黄斑病变的效率比较。
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2022 Jan;260(1):73-81. doi: 10.1007/s00417-021-05320-y. Epub 2021 Jul 26.
8
Vitrectomy with internal limiting membrane peeling and gas tamponade for myopic foveoschisis.玻璃体切割联合内界膜剥除及气体填充治疗近视性黄斑劈裂
BMC Ophthalmol. 2022 May 12;22(1):214. doi: 10.1186/s12886-022-02376-0.
9
Surgical outcomes of centripetal non-fovea-sparing internal limiting membrane peeling for myopic foveoschisis with and without foveal detachment: a follow-up of at least 3 years.中心性非凹部保留内界膜剥除术治疗伴或不伴中心凹脱离的近视性黄斑劈裂的手术效果:至少 3 年的随访。
Br J Ophthalmol. 2020 Sep;104(9):1266-1270. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2019-314972. Epub 2019 Dec 12.
10
Anatomical and visual outcomes of fovea-sparing internal limiting membrane peeling with or without inverted flap technique for myopic foveoschisis.保留中心凹的内界膜剥除联合或不联合翻转内界膜瓣技术治疗近视性中心凹下视网膜劈裂的解剖学和视觉效果。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2022 Nov 18;22(1):444. doi: 10.1186/s12886-022-02679-2.

引用本文的文献

1
Resolution of Myopic Macular Retinoschisis and Macular Hole With Topical Medical Therapy.局部药物治疗近视性黄斑视网膜劈裂和黄斑裂孔的消退
J Vitreoretin Dis. 2025 May 15:24741264251340107. doi: 10.1177/24741264251340107.
2
A Novel Technique Using Lyophilized Amniotic Membrane Patch (LAMPatch) as Primary Procedure in Patients with Myopic Traction Maculopathy with Macular Detachment.一种使用冻干羊膜贴片(LAMPatch)作为原发性手术治疗伴有黄斑脱离的近视性牵引性黄斑病变患者的新技术。
Clin Ophthalmol. 2024 Sep 2;18:2473-2480. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S469801. eCollection 2024.
3
Efficacy of pars plana vitrectomy combined with internal limiting membrane peeling and gas tamponade for treating myopic foveoschisis: a meta-analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of effectiveness between complete internal limiting membrane peeling and internal limiting membrane peeling with preservation of the central fovea in combination with 25G vitrectomy for the treatment of high myopic foveoschisis.完全内界膜剥除术与保留中央凹的内界膜剥除联合25G玻璃体切除术治疗高度近视性黄斑劈裂的疗效比较
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Mar;98(9):e14710. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000014710.
2
Comparative Study of 27-Gauge Versus 25-Gauge Vitrectomy With Air Tamponade in the Treatment of Myopic Foveoschisis.27G与25G玻璃体切除术联合空气填塞治疗近视性黄斑劈裂的对比研究
Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2018 Oct 1;49(10):e135-e142. doi: 10.3928/23258160-20181002-16.
3
经平坦部玻璃体切除术联合内界膜剥除及气液填充治疗近视性黄斑劈裂的疗效:一项荟萃分析。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2024 Jul 18;24(1):293. doi: 10.1186/s12886-024-03534-2.
4
Case report: Outer lamellar macular hole and outer retinal detachment within myopic foveoschisis post-cataract surgery.病例报告:白内障术后近视性黄斑劈裂中的外层黄斑裂孔和外层视网膜脱离。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 Apr 17;10:1154338. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1154338. eCollection 2023.
5
Long-term outcome of pathologic myopic foveoschisis treated with posterior scleral reinforcement followed by vitrectomy.后巩膜加固术联合玻璃体切割术治疗病理性近视性黄斑劈裂的长期疗效
Int J Ophthalmol. 2022 Jun 18;15(6):975-982. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2022.06.16. eCollection 2022.
6
A novel surgical technique of internal limiting membrane peeling for high myopic foveoschisis: a wide range of whole piece consecutive peeling without preservation of epi-fovea.一种用于高度近视性黄斑劈裂的新型内界膜剥除手术技术:不保留黄斑前膜的大范围整块连续剥除。
Int J Ophthalmol. 2022 Feb 18;15(2):284-290. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2022.02.14. eCollection 2022.
Myopic maculopathy: Current status and proposal for a new classification and grading system (ATN).
近视性黄斑病变:现状与新分类分级系统(ATN)的建议
Prog Retin Eye Res. 2019 Mar;69:80-115. doi: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2018.10.005. Epub 2018 Nov 1.
4
Long-term surgical outcomes of multiple parfoveolar curvilinear internal limiting membrane peeling for myopic foveoschisis.多象限黄斑区弧形内界膜撕除治疗近视性黄斑劈裂的长期手术效果。
Eye (Lond). 2018 Nov;32(11):1783-1789. doi: 10.1038/s41433-018-0178-0. Epub 2018 Jul 30.
5
VITRECTOMY WITH INTERNAL LIMITING MEMBRANE PEELING AND AIR TAMPONADE FOR MYOPIC FOVEOSCHISIS.玻璃体切割联合内界膜剥除及空气填充治疗近视性黄斑劈裂。
Retina. 2019 Nov;39(11):2125-2131. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000002265.
6
Efficacy of non-fovea-sparing ILM peeling for symptomatic myopic foveoschisis with and without macular hole.非中心凹保留内界膜剥除术治疗有和无黄斑孔的症状性近视性黄斑劈裂。
Br J Ophthalmol. 2019 Feb;103(2):257-263. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2017-311775. Epub 2018 Apr 30.
7
Long-term outcome of internal limiting membrane peeling with and without foveal sparing in myopic foveoschisis.近视性黄斑劈裂中保留与不保留黄斑中心凹的内界膜剥除术的长期预后
Eur J Ophthalmol. 2019 Jan;29(1):69-74. doi: 10.1177/1120672117750059. Epub 2018 Mar 22.
8
TO PEEL OR NOT TO PEEL THE INTERNAL LIMITING MEMBRANE IN IDIOPATHIC EPIRETINAL MEMBRANES.特发性视网膜内界膜是否需要剥除。
Retina. 2018 Sep;38 Suppl 1:S5-S11. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000001906.
9
Long-term outcome of highly myopic foveoschisis treated by vitrectomy with or without gas tamponade.采用或不采用气体填塞的玻璃体切除术治疗高度近视性黄斑劈裂的长期预后
Int J Ophthalmol. 2017 Sep 18;10(9):1392-1395. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2017.09.10. eCollection 2017.
10
Internal limiting membrane peeling and gas tamponade for myopic foveoschisis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.高度近视性黄斑劈裂的内界膜剥除联合气体填充术:一项系统评价与Meta分析
BMC Ophthalmol. 2017 Sep 8;17(1):166. doi: 10.1186/s12886-017-0562-8.