• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2017 年,尼日利亚博尔诺州境内流离失所者难民营爆发霍乱疫情,多部门做出应急响应。

The multi-sectorial emergency response to a cholera outbreak in Internally Displaced Persons camps in Borno State, Nigeria, 2017.

机构信息

International Health, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

World Health Organisation, Nigeria Country Office, Abuja, Nigeria.

出版信息

BMJ Glob Health. 2020 Jan 28;5(1):e002000. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2019-002000. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.1136/bmjgh-2019-002000
PMID:32133173
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7042583/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

In August 2017, a cholera outbreak started in Muna Garage Internally Displaced Persons camp, Borno state, Nigeria and >5000 cases occurred in six local government areas. This qualitative study evaluated perspectives about the emergency response to this outbreak.

METHODS

We conducted 39 key informant interviews and focus group discussions, and reviewed 21 documents with participants involved with surveillance, water, sanitation, hygiene, case management, oral cholera vaccine (OCV), communications, logistics and coordination. Qualitative data analysis used thematic techniques comprising key words in context, word repetition and key sector terms.

RESULTS

Authorities were alerted quickly, but outbreak declaration took 12 days due to a 10-day delay waiting for culture confirmation. Outbreak investigation revealed several potential transmission channels, but a leaking latrine around the index cases' house was not repaired for more than 7 days. Chlorine was initially not accepted by the community due to rumours that it would sterilise women. Key messages were in Hausa, although Kanuri was the primary local language; later this was corrected. Planning would have benefited using exercise drills to identify weaknesses, and inventory sharing to avoid stock outs. The response by the Rural Water Supply and Sanitation Agency was perceived to be slow and an increased risk from a religious festival was not recognised. Case management was provided at treatment centres, but some partners were concerned that their work was not recognised asking, 'Who gets the glory and the data?' Nearly one million people received OCV and its distribution benefited from a robust infrastructure for polio vaccination. There was initial anxiety, rumour and reluctance about OCV, attributed by many to lack of formative research prior to vaccine implementation. Coordination was slow initially, but improved with activation of an emergency operations centre (EOC) that enabled implementation of incident management system to coordinate multisectoral activities and meetings held at 16:00 hours daily. The synergy between partners and government improved when each recognised the government's leadership role.

CONCLUSION

Despite a timely alert of the outbreak, delayed laboratory confirmation slowed initial response. Initial responses to the outbreak were not well coordinated but improved with the EOC. Understanding behaviours and community norms through rapid formative research should improve the effectiveness of the emergency response to a cholera outbreak. OCV distribution was efficient and benefited from the polio vaccine infrastructure.

摘要

简介

2017 年 8 月,尼日利亚博尔诺州穆纳汽车修理厂境内流离失所者营地爆发霍乱疫情,6 个地方政府地区发生了 5000 多例病例。本项定性研究评估了对这起疫情的应急反应。

方法

我们进行了 39 次关键知情人访谈和焦点小组讨论,并与参与监测、水、环境卫生、病例管理、口服霍乱疫苗(OCV)、通信、后勤和协调的 21 名参与者审查了 21 份文件。定性数据分析采用了主题技术,包括上下文中的关键词、单词重复和关键部门术语。

结果

当局很快得到了警报,但由于等待培养物确认需要 10 天,因此宣布疫情爆发需要 12 天。疫情调查发现了几个潜在的传播渠道,但在指数病例家周围的一个渗漏厕所没有得到修复超过 7 天。由于有传言称氯会使女性绝育,社区最初不接受氯。主要信息是用豪萨语发布的,尽管主要当地语言是卡努里语,但后来这一点得到了纠正。规划将受益于使用演习来发现弱点,以及共享库存以避免库存不足。农村供水和环境卫生机构的反应被认为是缓慢的,而且一个宗教节日带来的风险没有得到认识。病例管理是在治疗中心提供的,但一些合作伙伴担心他们的工作没有得到承认,他们问:“谁得到荣誉和数据?”将近 100 万人接受了 OCV,其分发得益于用于脊髓灰质炎疫苗接种的强大基础设施。最初,人们对 OCV 感到焦虑、谣言和不情愿,许多人认为这是由于在疫苗实施前缺乏形成性研究。协调最初很慢,但随着应急行动中心(EOC)的激活而得到改善,该中心启用了事件管理系统,以协调多部门活动和每天 16 点举行的会议。当合作伙伴和政府都认识到政府的领导作用时,它们之间的协同作用得到了改善。

结论

尽管疫情及时得到警报,但实验室确认的延迟减缓了最初的反应。对疫情的最初反应协调不力,但随着应急行动中心的启用而得到改善。通过快速形成性研究了解行为和社区规范应提高对霍乱疫情的应急反应效果。OCV 的分发是高效的,并受益于脊髓灰质炎疫苗基础设施。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5914/7042583/8a414a1ed00b/bmjgh-2019-002000f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5914/7042583/b7eaa479f6db/bmjgh-2019-002000f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5914/7042583/8a414a1ed00b/bmjgh-2019-002000f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5914/7042583/b7eaa479f6db/bmjgh-2019-002000f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5914/7042583/8a414a1ed00b/bmjgh-2019-002000f02.jpg

相似文献

1
The multi-sectorial emergency response to a cholera outbreak in Internally Displaced Persons camps in Borno State, Nigeria, 2017.2017 年,尼日利亚博尔诺州境内流离失所者难民营爆发霍乱疫情,多部门做出应急响应。
BMJ Glob Health. 2020 Jan 28;5(1):e002000. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2019-002000. eCollection 2020.
2
The reactive vaccination campaign against cholera emergency in camps for internally displaced persons, Borno, Nigeria, 2017: a two-stage cluster survey.2017 年在尼日利亚博尔诺州境内流离失所者营地开展的霍乱应急反应性接种运动:两阶段聚类抽样调查。
BMJ Glob Health. 2020 Jun;5(6). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-002431.
3
Oral Cholera Vaccine Coverage during an Outbreak and Humanitarian Crisis, Iraq, 2015.2015年伊拉克霍乱疫情及人道主义危机期间的口服霍乱疫苗接种覆盖率
Emerg Infect Dis. 2017 Jan;23(1):38-45. doi: 10.3201/eid2301.160881.
4
Feasibility and acceptability of oral cholera vaccine mass vaccination campaign in response to an outbreak and floods in Malawi.在马拉维应对霍乱疫情和洪水时开展口服霍乱疫苗大规模接种运动的可行性和可接受性。
Pan Afr Med J. 2016 Apr 20;23:203. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2016.23.203.8346. eCollection 2016.
5
Low case fatality during 2017 cholera outbreak in Borno State, North Eastern Nigeria.2017年尼日利亚东北部博尔诺州霍乱疫情期间病死率较低。
Ann Afr Med. 2018 Oct-Dec;17(4):203-209. doi: 10.4103/aam.aam_66_17.
6
The potential impact of case-area targeted interventions in response to cholera outbreaks: A modeling study.针对霍乱疫情的病例地区靶向干预的潜在影响:一项建模研究。
PLoS Med. 2018 Feb 27;15(2):e1002509. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002509. eCollection 2018 Feb.
7
Comparing alternative cholera vaccination strategies in Maela refugee camp: using a transmission model in public health practice.比较 Maela 难民营中替代霍乱疫苗接种策略:在公共卫生实践中使用传播模型。
BMC Infect Dis. 2019 Dec 21;19(1):1075. doi: 10.1186/s12879-019-4688-6.
8
A descriptive cross-sectional study of cholera at Kakuma and Kalobeyei refugee camps, Kenya in 2018.2018 年肯尼亚卡卡马和卡洛贝伊难民营霍乱的描述性横断面研究。
Pan Afr Med J. 2020 Oct 29;37:197. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2020.37.197.24798. eCollection 2020.
9
Measles outbreak in complex emergency: estimating vaccine effectiveness and evaluation of the vaccination campaign in Borno State, Nigeria, 2019.麻疹疫情在复杂紧急情况下的应对:2019 年尼日利亚博尔诺州疫苗效力评估和接种活动评价。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Mar 4;21(1):437. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-10436-1.
10
Post-vaccination campaign coverage evaluation of oral cholera vaccine, oral polio vaccine and measles-rubella vaccine among Forcibly Displaced Myanmar Nationals in Bangladesh.孟加拉国境内被迫流离失所的缅甸国民中口服霍乱疫苗、口服脊髓灰质炎疫苗和麻疹风疹疫苗接种后运动覆盖情况评估。
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2019;15(12):2882-2886. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2019.1616502. Epub 2019 Aug 23.

引用本文的文献

1
How prepared is Nigeria digital payment for health workers? A landscape analysis.尼日利亚的数字支付对医护人员的准备情况如何?一项全景分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Feb 3;25(1):200. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12338-z.
2
Cholera in Nigeria: A review of outbreaks, trends, contributing factors, and public health responses.尼日利亚的霍乱:疫情、趋势、影响因素及公共卫生应对措施综述
Niger Med J. 2025 Jan 10;65(6):824-843. doi: 10.60787/nmj.v65i6.584. eCollection 2024 Nov-Dec.
3
Cholera Outbreaks in Low- and Middle-Income Countries in the Last Decade: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
Responding to epidemics in large-scale humanitarian crises: a case study of the cholera response in Yemen, 2016-2018.应对大规模人道主义危机中的疫情:以2016 - 2018年也门霍乱应对为例
BMJ Glob Health. 2019 Jul 15;4(4):e001709. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2019-001709. eCollection 2019.
2
Exploring the determinants of open defecation in Nigeria using demographic and health survey data.利用人口与健康调查数据探究尼日利亚随地大小便的决定因素。
Sci Total Environ. 2018 Oct 1;637-638:1455-1465. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.05.104. Epub 2018 May 22.
3
Cultural influences behind cholera transmission in the Far North Region, Republic of Cameroon: a field experience and implications for operational level planning of interventions.
过去十年中低收入国家的霍乱疫情:系统评价与Meta分析
Microorganisms. 2024 Dec 4;12(12):2504. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms12122504.
4
Outbreak of cholera in the Southwest region of Cameroon, 2021-22: an epidemiological investigation.2021 - 22年喀麦隆西南部地区霍乱疫情:一项流行病学调查
BMC Public Health. 2024 Dec 25;24(1):3585. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-21126-z.
5
Vaccination strategies to identify and reach zero-dose and under-immunized children in crisis-affected states in Sudan: a qualitative study.苏丹受危机影响地区识别和覆盖零剂量及未充分免疫儿童的疫苗接种策略:一项定性研究
Confl Health. 2024 Dec 23;18(1):76. doi: 10.1186/s13031-024-00639-9.
6
Resource availability and capacity to implement multi-stranded cholera interventions in the north-east region of Nigeria.尼日利亚东北地区实施多层面霍乱干预措施的资源可用性和能力。
BMC Glob Public Health. 2023 Aug 4;1(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s44263-023-00008-3.
7
Enablers and barriers to implementing cholera interventions in Nigeria: a community-based system dynamics approach.在尼日利亚实施霍乱干预措施的促成因素和障碍:基于社区的系统动力学方法。
Health Policy Plan. 2024 Oct 15;39(9):970-984. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czae067.
8
The reactive cholera vaccination campaign in urban Dhaka in 2022: experience, lessons learned and future directions.2022年达卡市霍乱应急疫苗接种运动:经验、教训及未来方向
Public Health Pract (Oxf). 2024 Feb 14;7:100478. doi: 10.1016/j.puhip.2024.100478. eCollection 2024 Jun.
9
The Governance of Childhood Vaccination Services in Crisis Settings: A Scoping Review.危机环境下儿童疫苗接种服务的治理:一项范围综述
Vaccines (Basel). 2023 Dec 14;11(12):1853. doi: 10.3390/vaccines11121853.
10
Influences of community engagement and health system strengthening for cholera control in cholera reporting countries.社区参与和加强卫生系统对霍乱报告国家霍乱控制的影响。
BMJ Glob Health. 2023 Dec 6;8(12):e013788. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2023-013788.
喀麦隆共和国远北地区霍乱传播背后的文化影响:实地经验及对干预措施操作层面规划的启示
Pan Afr Med J. 2017 Dec 15;28:311. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2017.28.311.13860. eCollection 2017.
4
Exploring Droughts and Floods and Their Association with Cholera Outbreaks in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Register-Based Ecological Study from 1990 to 2010.探索撒哈拉以南非洲的干旱和洪水及其与霍乱疫情爆发的关系:基于登记的 1990 年至 2010 年的生态研究。
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2018 May;98(5):1269-1274. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.17-0778. Epub 2018 Mar 1.
5
The Development of Standard Operating Procedures for Social Mobilization and Community Engagement in Sierra Leone During the West Africa Ebola Outbreak of 2014-2015.2014 - 2015年西非埃博拉疫情期间塞拉利昂社会动员与社区参与标准操作程序的制定
J Health Commun. 2017;22(sup1):39-50. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2016.1212130.
6
Facilitators and Barriers to Community Acceptance of Safe, Dignified Medical Burials in the Context of an Ebola Epidemic, Sierra Leone, 2014.2014年,在塞拉利昂埃博拉疫情背景下,社区接受安全、体面的医学葬礼的促进因素和障碍
J Health Commun. 2017;22(sup1):24-30. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2016.1209601.
7
Social Mobilization and Community Engagement Central to the Ebola Response in West Africa: Lessons for Future Public Health Emergencies.社会动员和社区参与是西非应对埃博拉疫情的核心:对未来公共卫生突发事件的启示。
Glob Health Sci Pract. 2016 Dec 28;4(4):626-646. doi: 10.9745/GHSP-D-16-00226. Print 2016 Dec 23.
8
Oral Cholera Vaccine Coverage during an Outbreak and Humanitarian Crisis, Iraq, 2015.2015年伊拉克霍乱疫情及人道主义危机期间的口服霍乱疫苗接种覆盖率
Emerg Infect Dis. 2017 Jan;23(1):38-45. doi: 10.3201/eid2301.160881.
9
Immune Responses to an Oral Cholera Vaccine in Internally Displaced Persons in South Sudan.南苏丹境内流离失所者对口服霍乱疫苗的免疫反应。
Sci Rep. 2016 Oct 24;6:35742. doi: 10.1038/srep35742.
10
Effectiveness of one dose of oral cholera vaccine in response to an outbreak: a case-cohort study.一剂口服霍乱疫苗对疫情的有效性:病例对照研究。
Lancet Glob Health. 2016 Nov;4(11):e856-e863. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(16)30211-X.