• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2017 年在尼日利亚博尔诺州境内流离失所者营地开展的霍乱应急反应性接种运动:两阶段聚类抽样调查。

The reactive vaccination campaign against cholera emergency in camps for internally displaced persons, Borno, Nigeria, 2017: a two-stage cluster survey.

机构信息

International Health, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA

WHO, Nigeria Country Office, Abuja, Nigeria.

出版信息

BMJ Glob Health. 2020 Jun;5(6). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-002431.

DOI:10.1136/bmjgh-2020-002431
PMID:32601092
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7326259/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

In 2017, amidst insecurity and displacements posed by Boko Haram armed insurgency, cholera outbreak started in the Muna Garage camp for Internally Displaced Persons (IDPs) in Borno State, Nigeria. In response, the Borno Ministry of Health and partners determined to provide oral cholera vaccine (OCV) to about 1 million people in IDP camps and surrounding communities in six Local Government Areas (LGAs) including Maiduguri, Jere, Konduga, Mafa, Dikwa, and Monguno. As part of Monitoring and Evaluation, we described the coverage achieved, adverse events following immunisation (AEFI), non-vaccination reasons, vaccination decisions as well as campaign information sources.

METHODS

We conducted two-stage probability cluster surveys with clusters selected without replacement according to probability-proportionate-to-population-size in the six LGAs targeted by the campaign. Individuals aged ≥1 years were the eligible study population. Data sources were household interviews with vaccine card verification and memory recall, if no card, as well as multiple choice questions with an open-ended option.

RESULTS

Overall, 12 931 respondents participated in the survey. Overall, 90% (95% CI: 88 to 92) of the target population received at least one dose of OCV, range 87% (95% CI: 75 to 94) in Maiduguri to 94% (95% CI: 88 to 97) in Monguno. The weighted two-dose coverage was 73% (95% CI: 68 to 77) with a low of 68% (95% CI: 46 to 86) in Maiduguri to a high of 87% (95% CI: 74 to 95) in Dikwa. The coverage was lower during first round (76%, 95% CI: 71 to 80) than second round (87%, 95% CI: 84 to 89) and ranged from 72% (95% CI: 42 to 89) and 82% (95% CI: 82 to 91) in Maiduguri to 87% (95% CI: 75 to 95) and 94% (95% CI: 88 to 97) in Dikwa for the respective first and second rounds. Also, coverage was higher among females of age 5 to 14 and ≥15 years than males of same age groups. There were mild AEFI with the most common symptoms being fever, headache and diarrhoea occurring up to 48 hours after ingesting the vaccine. The most common actions taken after AEFI symptoms included 'did nothing' and 'self-medicated at home'. The top reason for taking vaccine was to protect from cholera while top reason for non-vaccination was travel/work. The main source of campaign information was a neighbour. An overwhelming majority (96%, 95% CI: 95% to 98%) felt the campaign team treated them with respect. While 43% (95% CI: 36% to 50%) asked no questions, 37% (95% CI: 31% to 44%) felt the team addressed all their concerns.

CONCLUSION

The campaign achieved high coverage using door-to-door and fixed sites strategies amidst insecurity posed by Boko Haram. Additional studies are needed to improve how to reduce non-vaccination, especially for the first round. While OCV provides protection for a few years, additional actions will be needed to make investments in water, sanitation and hygiene infrastructure.

摘要

简介

2017 年,在博科圣地武装叛乱造成的不安全和流离失所的情况下,尼日利亚博尔诺州穆纳车库营地的霍乱疫情开始爆发。作为回应,博尔诺州卫生部和合作伙伴决定向六个地方政府地区(LGAs)的难民营和周边社区的大约 100 万人提供口服霍乱疫苗(OCV)。作为监测和评估的一部分,我们描述了所达到的覆盖率、接种后不良反应(AEFI)、未接种疫苗的原因、接种决定以及运动信息来源。

方法

我们在六个目标 LGAs 中进行了两阶段概率聚类调查,每个阶段的集群都是根据人口比例进行无替换选择的。年龄≥1 岁的个人是合格的研究人群。数据来源是家庭访谈,并与疫苗接种卡进行核实和记忆回忆,如果没有卡,则进行多项选择题和开放式选项。

结果

共有 12931 名受访者参加了调查。总体而言,目标人群中有 90%(95%CI:88 至 92)至少接种了一剂 OCV,从 87%(95%CI:75 至 94)在迈杜古里到 94%(95%CI:88 至 97)在蒙古诺。加权两剂覆盖率为 73%(95%CI:68 至 77),在迈杜古里最低为 68%(95%CI:46 至 86),在迪克瓦最高为 87%(95%CI:74 至 95)。第一轮(76%,95%CI:71 至 80)的覆盖率低于第二轮(87%,95%CI:84 至 89),从 72%(95%CI:42 至 89)和 82%(95%CI:82 至 91)在迈杜古里到 87%(95%CI:75 至 95)和 94%(95%CI:88 至 97)在迪克瓦的第一轮和第二轮。此外,年龄在 5 至 14 岁和≥15 岁的女性的覆盖率高于同年龄组的男性。接种疫苗后出现轻度 AEFI,最常见的症状是发烧、头痛和腹泻,这些症状在接种疫苗后 48 小时内发生。接种疫苗后最常见的行动包括“什么也不做”和“在家自疗”。接种疫苗的主要原因是预防霍乱,而不接种疫苗的主要原因是旅行/工作。运动信息的主要来源是邻居。绝大多数人(96%,95%CI:95%至 98%)认为运动团队对他们表示尊重。虽然 43%(95%CI:36%至 50%)没有提问,但 37%(95%CI:31%至 44%)认为团队解决了他们的所有问题。

结论

该运动在博科圣地造成的不安全局势下,通过挨家挨户和固定地点的策略实现了高覆盖率。需要进一步研究如何减少未接种疫苗的情况,特别是第一轮。虽然 OCV 可以提供几年的保护,但需要采取额外的行动,投资于水、卫生和环境卫生基础设施。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1ff8/7326259/57407b6afbdd/bmjgh-2020-002431f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1ff8/7326259/f5c1875664e3/bmjgh-2020-002431f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1ff8/7326259/f5c24886f474/bmjgh-2020-002431f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1ff8/7326259/57407b6afbdd/bmjgh-2020-002431f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1ff8/7326259/f5c1875664e3/bmjgh-2020-002431f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1ff8/7326259/f5c24886f474/bmjgh-2020-002431f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1ff8/7326259/57407b6afbdd/bmjgh-2020-002431f03.jpg

相似文献

1
The reactive vaccination campaign against cholera emergency in camps for internally displaced persons, Borno, Nigeria, 2017: a two-stage cluster survey.2017 年在尼日利亚博尔诺州境内流离失所者营地开展的霍乱应急反应性接种运动:两阶段聚类抽样调查。
BMJ Glob Health. 2020 Jun;5(6). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-002431.
2
The multi-sectorial emergency response to a cholera outbreak in Internally Displaced Persons camps in Borno State, Nigeria, 2017.2017 年,尼日利亚博尔诺州境内流离失所者难民营爆发霍乱疫情,多部门做出应急响应。
BMJ Glob Health. 2020 Jan 28;5(1):e002000. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2019-002000. eCollection 2020.
3
Feasibility and acceptability of oral cholera vaccine mass vaccination campaign in response to an outbreak and floods in Malawi.在马拉维应对霍乱疫情和洪水时开展口服霍乱疫苗大规模接种运动的可行性和可接受性。
Pan Afr Med J. 2016 Apr 20;23:203. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2016.23.203.8346. eCollection 2016.
4
The challenges of insecurity on implementing vaccination campaign and its effect on measles elimination and control efforts: A case study of 2017/18 measles campaign in Borno state, Nigeria.不安全因素对疫苗接种活动实施的挑战及其对消除和控制麻疹努力的影响:以尼日利亚博尔诺州 2017/18 年麻疹运动为例的案例研究。
Vaccine. 2021 Nov 17;39 Suppl 3:C66-C75. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.01.024. Epub 2021 Feb 3.
5
Oral cholera vaccine coverage during a preventive door-to-door mass vaccination campaign in Nampula, Mozambique.口服霍乱疫苗在莫桑比克楠普拉省预防性挨家挨户大规模疫苗接种运动中的覆盖情况。
PLoS One. 2018 Oct 3;13(10):e0198592. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0198592. eCollection 2018.
6
Oral Cholera Vaccine Coverage during an Outbreak and Humanitarian Crisis, Iraq, 2015.2015年伊拉克霍乱疫情及人道主义危机期间的口服霍乱疫苗接种覆盖率
Emerg Infect Dis. 2017 Jan;23(1):38-45. doi: 10.3201/eid2301.160881.
7
Mass vaccination with a two-dose oral cholera vaccine in a long-standing refugee camp, Thailand.在泰国一个长期存在的难民营中大规模接种两剂口服霍乱疫苗。
Vaccine. 2016 Jan 2;34(1):128-33. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.10.112. Epub 2015 Nov 6.
8
High cholera vaccination coverage following emergency campaign in Haiti: Results from a cluster survey in three rural Communes in the South Department, 2017.海地应急运动后霍乱疫苗高接种率:2017 年在南部三省三个农村公社进行的群组调查结果。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2020 Jan 31;14(1):e0007967. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0007967. eCollection 2020 Jan.
9
An innovative approach in monitoring oral cholera vaccination campaign: integration of a between-round survey.一种创新性的监测口服霍乱疫苗接种运动的方法:轮次间调查的整合。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Feb 5;22(1):238. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-12610-5.
10
First outbreak response using an oral cholera vaccine in Africa: vaccine coverage, acceptability and surveillance of adverse events, Guinea, 2012.非洲首次暴发疫情时使用口服霍乱疫苗:2012 年,几内亚的疫苗接种覆盖率、可接受性和不良反应监测。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2013 Oct 17;7(10):e2465. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0002465. eCollection 2013.

引用本文的文献

1
Vaccination in Forcibly Displaced, Pediatric Populations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.强制流离失所儿童群体的疫苗接种:系统评价与荟萃分析
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Jun 2;8(6):e2516237. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.16237.
2
High confidence and demand for hepatitis E vaccine during an outbreak in Bentiu, South Sudan: A qualitative study.南苏丹本提乌疫情期间对戊型肝炎疫苗的高度信心和需求:一项定性研究
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2025 Mar 6;5(3):e0003482. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0003482. eCollection 2025.
3
Cholera in Nigeria: A review of outbreaks, trends, contributing factors, and public health responses.

本文引用的文献

1
The multi-sectorial emergency response to a cholera outbreak in Internally Displaced Persons camps in Borno State, Nigeria, 2017.2017 年,尼日利亚博尔诺州境内流离失所者难民营爆发霍乱疫情,多部门做出应急响应。
BMJ Glob Health. 2020 Jan 28;5(1):e002000. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2019-002000. eCollection 2020.
2
Targeting the last polio sanctuaries with Directly Observed Oral Polio Vaccination (DOPV) in northern Nigeria, (2014-2016).在尼日利亚北部,以直接观察口服脊髓灰质炎疫苗(DOPV)为手段,针对最后的脊髓灰质炎疫区进行免疫(2014-2016 年)。
BMC Public Health. 2018 Dec 13;18(Suppl 4):1314. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-6182-2.
3
Oral cholera vaccination in hard-to-reach communities, Lake Chilwa, Malawi.
尼日利亚的霍乱:疫情、趋势、影响因素及公共卫生应对措施综述
Niger Med J. 2025 Jan 10;65(6):824-843. doi: 10.60787/nmj.v65i6.584. eCollection 2024 Nov-Dec.
4
Vaccination strategies to identify and reach zero-dose and under-immunized children in crisis-affected states in Sudan: a qualitative study.苏丹受危机影响地区识别和覆盖零剂量及未充分免疫儿童的疫苗接种策略:一项定性研究
Confl Health. 2024 Dec 23;18(1):76. doi: 10.1186/s13031-024-00639-9.
5
An evaluation of the surveillance system for monitoring and reporting adverse events following immunization in Kebbi State, Northern Nigeria: a mixed method approach.尼日利亚北部凯比州免疫接种后不良事件监测和报告监测系统评估:混合方法研究。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Oct 21;24(1):2906. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-20356-5.
6
Rapid cholera outbreak control following catastrophic landslides and floods: A case study of Bududa district, Uganda.灾难后迅速控制霍乱暴发:以乌干达布杜达区为例的案例研究。
Afr Health Sci. 2023 Dec;23(4):203-215. doi: 10.4314/ahs.v23i4.23.
7
Development of a Scorecard to Monitor Progress toward National Cholera Elimination: Its Application in Uganda.开发用于监测国家消除霍乱进展的记分卡:在乌干达的应用。
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2023 Apr 10;108(5):954-962. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.23-0007. Print 2023 May 3.
8
A scoping review of facilitators and barriers influencing the implementation of surveillance and oral cholera vaccine interventions for cholera control in lower- and middle-income countries.一项关于影响中低收入国家霍乱控制中监测和口服霍乱疫苗干预措施实施的促进因素和障碍的范围综述。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Mar 8;23(1):455. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15326-2.
9
Coverage survey and lessons learned from a pre-emptive cholera vaccination campaign in urban and rural communities affected by landslides and floods in Freetown Sierra Leone.塞拉利昂弗里敦受山体滑坡和洪水影响的城乡社区先发制人霍乱疫苗接种运动的覆盖情况调查和经验教训。
Vaccine. 2023 Mar 31;41(14):2397-2403. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.01.026. Epub 2023 Mar 3.
10
Strengthening vaccination delivery system resilience in the context of protracted humanitarian crisis: a realist-informed systematic review.在持久人道主义危机背景下加强疫苗接种提供系统的弹性:基于现实主义理论的系统评价。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Oct 23;22(1):1277. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08653-4.
马拉维奇利瓦湖偏远社区的口服霍乱疫苗接种。
Bull World Health Organ. 2018 Dec 1;96(12):817-825. doi: 10.2471/BLT.17.206417. Epub 2018 Sep 27.
4
Exploring Droughts and Floods and Their Association with Cholera Outbreaks in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Register-Based Ecological Study from 1990 to 2010.探索撒哈拉以南非洲的干旱和洪水及其与霍乱疫情爆发的关系:基于登记的 1990 年至 2010 年的生态研究。
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2018 May;98(5):1269-1274. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.17-0778. Epub 2018 Mar 1.
5
Implementation research: reactive mass vaccination with single-dose oral cholera vaccine, Zambia.实施研究:用一剂口服霍乱疫苗进行反应性大规模疫苗接种,赞比亚。
Bull World Health Organ. 2018 Feb 1;96(2):86-93. doi: 10.2471/BLT.16.189241. Epub 2017 Oct 19.
6
Cholera vaccines: WHO position paper – August 2017.霍乱疫苗:世界卫生组织立场文件 - 2017年8月
Wkly Epidemiol Rec. 2017 Aug 25;92(34):477-98.
7
Oral cholera vaccine coverage in hard-to-reach fishermen communities after two mass Campaigns, Malawi, 2016.2016年,马拉维开展两次大规模疫苗接种运动后,难以抵达的渔民社区的口服霍乱疫苗覆盖率
Vaccine. 2017 Sep 12;35(38):5194-5200. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.07.104. Epub 2017 Aug 10.
8
Deployments from the oral cholera vaccine stockpile, 2013–2017.2013 - 2017年口服霍乱疫苗储备的调配情况。
Wkly Epidemiol Rec. 2017 Aug 11;92(32):437-42.
9
Lessons learnt from 12 oral cholera vaccine campaigns in resource-poor settings.在资源匮乏地区开展12次口服霍乱疫苗接种活动的经验教训。
Bull World Health Organ. 2017 Apr 1;95(4):303-312. doi: 10.2471/BLT.16.175166. Epub 2017 Feb 21.
10
Oral Cholera Vaccine Coverage during an Outbreak and Humanitarian Crisis, Iraq, 2015.2015年伊拉克霍乱疫情及人道主义危机期间的口服霍乱疫苗接种覆盖率
Emerg Infect Dis. 2017 Jan;23(1):38-45. doi: 10.3201/eid2301.160881.