International Health, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
WHO, Nigeria Country Office, Abuja, Nigeria.
BMJ Glob Health. 2020 Jun;5(6). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-002431.
In 2017, amidst insecurity and displacements posed by Boko Haram armed insurgency, cholera outbreak started in the Muna Garage camp for Internally Displaced Persons (IDPs) in Borno State, Nigeria. In response, the Borno Ministry of Health and partners determined to provide oral cholera vaccine (OCV) to about 1 million people in IDP camps and surrounding communities in six Local Government Areas (LGAs) including Maiduguri, Jere, Konduga, Mafa, Dikwa, and Monguno. As part of Monitoring and Evaluation, we described the coverage achieved, adverse events following immunisation (AEFI), non-vaccination reasons, vaccination decisions as well as campaign information sources.
We conducted two-stage probability cluster surveys with clusters selected without replacement according to probability-proportionate-to-population-size in the six LGAs targeted by the campaign. Individuals aged ≥1 years were the eligible study population. Data sources were household interviews with vaccine card verification and memory recall, if no card, as well as multiple choice questions with an open-ended option.
Overall, 12 931 respondents participated in the survey. Overall, 90% (95% CI: 88 to 92) of the target population received at least one dose of OCV, range 87% (95% CI: 75 to 94) in Maiduguri to 94% (95% CI: 88 to 97) in Monguno. The weighted two-dose coverage was 73% (95% CI: 68 to 77) with a low of 68% (95% CI: 46 to 86) in Maiduguri to a high of 87% (95% CI: 74 to 95) in Dikwa. The coverage was lower during first round (76%, 95% CI: 71 to 80) than second round (87%, 95% CI: 84 to 89) and ranged from 72% (95% CI: 42 to 89) and 82% (95% CI: 82 to 91) in Maiduguri to 87% (95% CI: 75 to 95) and 94% (95% CI: 88 to 97) in Dikwa for the respective first and second rounds. Also, coverage was higher among females of age 5 to 14 and ≥15 years than males of same age groups. There were mild AEFI with the most common symptoms being fever, headache and diarrhoea occurring up to 48 hours after ingesting the vaccine. The most common actions taken after AEFI symptoms included 'did nothing' and 'self-medicated at home'. The top reason for taking vaccine was to protect from cholera while top reason for non-vaccination was travel/work. The main source of campaign information was a neighbour. An overwhelming majority (96%, 95% CI: 95% to 98%) felt the campaign team treated them with respect. While 43% (95% CI: 36% to 50%) asked no questions, 37% (95% CI: 31% to 44%) felt the team addressed all their concerns.
The campaign achieved high coverage using door-to-door and fixed sites strategies amidst insecurity posed by Boko Haram. Additional studies are needed to improve how to reduce non-vaccination, especially for the first round. While OCV provides protection for a few years, additional actions will be needed to make investments in water, sanitation and hygiene infrastructure.
2017 年,在博科圣地武装叛乱造成的不安全和流离失所的情况下,尼日利亚博尔诺州穆纳车库营地的霍乱疫情开始爆发。作为回应,博尔诺州卫生部和合作伙伴决定向六个地方政府地区(LGAs)的难民营和周边社区的大约 100 万人提供口服霍乱疫苗(OCV)。作为监测和评估的一部分,我们描述了所达到的覆盖率、接种后不良反应(AEFI)、未接种疫苗的原因、接种决定以及运动信息来源。
我们在六个目标 LGAs 中进行了两阶段概率聚类调查,每个阶段的集群都是根据人口比例进行无替换选择的。年龄≥1 岁的个人是合格的研究人群。数据来源是家庭访谈,并与疫苗接种卡进行核实和记忆回忆,如果没有卡,则进行多项选择题和开放式选项。
共有 12931 名受访者参加了调查。总体而言,目标人群中有 90%(95%CI:88 至 92)至少接种了一剂 OCV,从 87%(95%CI:75 至 94)在迈杜古里到 94%(95%CI:88 至 97)在蒙古诺。加权两剂覆盖率为 73%(95%CI:68 至 77),在迈杜古里最低为 68%(95%CI:46 至 86),在迪克瓦最高为 87%(95%CI:74 至 95)。第一轮(76%,95%CI:71 至 80)的覆盖率低于第二轮(87%,95%CI:84 至 89),从 72%(95%CI:42 至 89)和 82%(95%CI:82 至 91)在迈杜古里到 87%(95%CI:75 至 95)和 94%(95%CI:88 至 97)在迪克瓦的第一轮和第二轮。此外,年龄在 5 至 14 岁和≥15 岁的女性的覆盖率高于同年龄组的男性。接种疫苗后出现轻度 AEFI,最常见的症状是发烧、头痛和腹泻,这些症状在接种疫苗后 48 小时内发生。接种疫苗后最常见的行动包括“什么也不做”和“在家自疗”。接种疫苗的主要原因是预防霍乱,而不接种疫苗的主要原因是旅行/工作。运动信息的主要来源是邻居。绝大多数人(96%,95%CI:95%至 98%)认为运动团队对他们表示尊重。虽然 43%(95%CI:36%至 50%)没有提问,但 37%(95%CI:31%至 44%)认为团队解决了他们的所有问题。
该运动在博科圣地造成的不安全局势下,通过挨家挨户和固定地点的策略实现了高覆盖率。需要进一步研究如何减少未接种疫苗的情况,特别是第一轮。虽然 OCV 可以提供几年的保护,但需要采取额外的行动,投资于水、卫生和环境卫生基础设施。