Suppr超能文献

应对大规模人道主义危机中的疫情:以2016 - 2018年也门霍乱应对为例

Responding to epidemics in large-scale humanitarian crises: a case study of the cholera response in Yemen, 2016-2018.

作者信息

Spiegel Paul, Ratnayake Ruwan, Hellman Nora, Ververs Mija, Ngwa Moise, Wise Paul H, Lantagne Daniele

机构信息

Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

Center for Humanitarian Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

出版信息

BMJ Glob Health. 2019 Jul 15;4(4):e001709. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2019-001709. eCollection 2019.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Large epidemics frequently emerge in conflict-affected states. We examined the cholera response during the humanitarian crisis in Yemen to inform control strategies.

METHODS

We conducted interviews with practitioners and advisors on preparedness; surveillance; laboratory; case management; malnutrition; water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH); vaccination; coordination and insecurity. We undertook a literature review of global and Yemen-specific cholera guidance, examined surveillance data from the first and second waves (28 September 2016-12 March 2018) and reviewed reports on airstrikes on water systems and health facilities (April 2015-December 2017). We used the Global Task Force on Cholera Control's framework to examine intervention strategies and thematic analysis to understand decision making.

RESULTS

Yemen is water scarce, and repeated airstrikes damaged water systems, risking widespread infection. Since a cholera preparedness and response plan was absent, on detection, the humanitarian cluster system rapidly developed response plans. The initial plans did not prioritise key actions including community-directed WASH to reduce transmission, epidemiological analysis and laboratory monitoring. Coordination was not harmonised across the crisis-focused clusters and epidemic-focused incident management system. The health strategy was crisis focused and was centralised on functional health facilities, underemphasising less accessible areas. As vaccination was not incorporated into preparedness, consensus on its use remained slow. At the second wave peak, key actions including data management, community-directed WASH and oral rehydration and vaccination were scaled-up.

CONCLUSION

Despite endemicity and conflict, Yemen was not prepared for the epidemic. To contain outbreaks, conflict-affected states, humanitarian agencies, and donors must emphasise preparedness planning and community-directed responses.

摘要

背景

大规模疫情经常在受冲突影响的国家爆发。我们研究了也门人道主义危机期间的霍乱应对措施,以为控制策略提供参考。

方法

我们采访了参与准备工作、监测、实验室、病例管理、营养不良、水、环境卫生与个人卫生(WASH)、疫苗接种、协调及不安全问题等方面的从业者和顾问。我们对全球及也门特定的霍乱指南进行了文献综述,研究了第一波和第二波疫情(2016年9月28日至2018年3月12日)的监测数据,并审查了关于对供水系统和卫生设施空袭的报告(2015年4月至2017年12月)。我们使用霍乱控制全球特别工作组的框架来研究干预策略,并通过主题分析来理解决策过程。

结果

也门水资源匮乏,反复的空袭破坏了供水系统,存在广泛感染的风险。由于缺乏霍乱准备和应对计划,在疫情被发现后,人道主义群组系统迅速制定了应对计划。最初的计划没有将包括社区主导的水、环境卫生与个人卫生措施以减少传播、流行病学分析和实验室监测等关键行动列为优先事项。在以危机为重点的群组和以疫情为重点的事件管理系统之间,协调工作没有得到统一。卫生战略以危机为重点,集中在功能健全的卫生设施上,对较难到达地区的重视不足。由于疫苗接种未纳入准备工作,关于其使用的共识形成缓慢。在第二波疫情高峰时,包括数据管理、社区主导的水、环境卫生与个人卫生措施以及口服补液和疫苗接种等关键行动得到了扩大。

结论

尽管也门存在地方病和冲突,但该国对疫情并未做好准备。为了控制疫情爆发,受冲突影响的国家、人道主义机构和捐助者必须强调准备计划和社区主导的应对措施。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bd11/6666825/c0040b37f429/bmjgh-2019-001709f01.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验