Center for Health and the Social Sciences, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
BMJ Glob Health. 2020 Feb 11;5(2):e002053. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2019-002053. eCollection 2020.
The availability of medical specialists has accelerated in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs), driven by factors including epidemiological and demographic shifts, doctors' preferences for postgraduate training, income growth and medical tourism. Yet, despite some policy efforts to increase access to specialists in rural health facilities and improve referral systems, many policy questions are still underaddressed or unaddressed in LMIC health sectors, including in the context of universal health coverage. Engaging with issues of specialisation may appear to be of secondary importance, compared with arguably more pressing concerns regarding primary care and the social determinants of health. However, we believe this to be a false choice. Policy at the intersection of essential health services and medical specialties is central to issues of access and equity, and failure to formulate policy in this regard may have adverse ramifications for the entire system. In this article, we describe three critical policy questions on medical specialties and health systems with the aim of provoking further analysis, discussion and policy formulation: (1) What types, and how many specialists to train? (2) How to link specialists' production and deployment to health systems strengthening and population health? (3) How to develop and strengthen institutions to steer specialisation policy? We posit that further analysis, discussion and policy formulation addressing these questions presents an important opportunity to explicitly determine and strengthen the linkages between specialists, health systems and health equity.
医学专家在中低收入国家(LMICs)的供应有所增加,这是由包括流行病学和人口结构变化、医生对研究生培训的偏好、收入增长和医疗旅游等因素驱动的。然而,尽管在农村卫生机构增加获得专科医生的机会和改善转诊系统方面做出了一些政策努力,但在 LMIC 卫生部门,包括在全民健康覆盖的背景下,仍有许多政策问题未得到解决或未得到充分解决。与初级保健和健康决定因素等更紧迫的问题相比,关注专业化问题似乎显得次要。然而,我们认为这是一种错误的选择。在基本卫生服务和医学专业之间的交叉点制定政策,对于获取和公平问题至关重要,如果未能在这方面制定政策,可能会对整个系统产生不利影响。在本文中,我们描述了与医学专业和卫生系统相关的三个关键政策问题,旨在引发进一步的分析、讨论和政策制定:(1)培训哪些类型的专家,以及培训多少专家?(2)如何将专家的生产和部署与卫生系统强化和人口健康联系起来?(3)如何发展和加强机构来指导专业化政策?我们认为,进一步分析、讨论和制定解决这些问题的政策,为明确确定和加强专家、卫生系统和健康公平之间的联系提供了一个重要机会。