Department of Experimental Psychology.
Department of Psychology.
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2020 May;88(5):455-469. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000488. Epub 2020 Mar 5.
Although most studies investigating sudden gains in treatments for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) report a positive association between sudden gains and outcomes at the end of treatment, less is known about sudden gains in routine clinical care and the processes involved in their occurrence. This study investigated changes in cognitive factors (negative appraisals, trauma memory characteristics) before, during, and after sudden gains in PTSD symptom severity.
Two samples (₁ = 248, ₂ = 234) of patients who received trauma-focused cognitive therapy for PTSD in routine clinical care were analyzed. Mahalanobis distance matching, including the propensity score, was used to compare patients with sudden gains and similar patients without sudden gains. Estimates from both samples were meta-analyzed to obtain pooled effects.
Patients with sudden gains (₁ = 76, ₂ = 87) reported better treatment outcomes in PTSD symptom severity, depression, and anxiety at the end of therapy and follow-up than those without sudden gains. No baseline predictors of sudden gains could be reliably identified. During sudden gains, those with sudden gains had greater changes in both cognitive factors than matched patients. Meta-analyses of the two samples showed that negative appraisals had already decreased in the session prior to sudden gains compared with matched patients.
The pooled estimates suggest that changes in negative trauma-related appraisals precede sudden gains in PTSD symptoms. The results suggest that interventions that promote change in appraisals may also facilitate sudden gains in therapy. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).
尽管大多数研究表明,创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)治疗中的突然获益与治疗结束时的结果之间存在正相关,但对于常规临床护理中的突然获益以及其发生所涉及的过程知之甚少。本研究调查了 PTSD 症状严重程度突然获益前后认知因素(负面评价、创伤记忆特征)的变化。
对在常规临床护理中接受创伤聚焦认知疗法治疗 PTSD 的两个样本(₁=248,₂=234)进行了分析。采用马哈拉诺比斯距离匹配(包括倾向评分),比较突然获益和类似无突然获益患者。对两个样本的估计值进行荟萃分析,以获得汇总效应。
与无突然获益的患者相比,突然获益的患者(₁=76,₂=87)在 PTSD 症状严重程度、抑郁和焦虑方面的治疗结果以及治疗结束和随访时的治疗结果更好。无法可靠地确定突然获益的基线预测因素。在突然获益期间,那些突然获益的患者的认知因素变化大于匹配的患者。对两个样本的荟萃分析表明,与匹配的患者相比,在突然获益前的治疗阶段,负面创伤相关评价已经降低。
汇总估计表明,负面创伤相关评价的变化先于 PTSD 症状的突然获益。结果表明,促进评价变化的干预措施也可能促进治疗中的突然获益。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2020 APA,保留所有权利)。