Department of Epidemiology, Madras Diabetes Research Foundation & Dr. Mohan's Diabetes Specialties Centre, Chennai, India.
Department of Endocrinology & Metabolism, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Pediatr Diabetes. 2021 Feb;22(1):31-39. doi: 10.1111/pedi.13004. Epub 2020 Mar 24.
To compare treatment regimens and glycosylated hemoglobin (A1c) levels in Type 1 (T1D) and Type 2 diabetes (T2D) using diabetes registries from two countries-U.S. SEARCH for Diabetes in Youth (SEARCH) and Indian Registry of youth onset diabetes in India (YDR).
The SEARCH and YDR data were harmonized to the structure and terminology in the Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership Common Data Model. Data used were from T1D and T2D youth diagnosed <20 years between 2006-2012 for YDR, and 2006, 2008, and 2012 for SEARCH. We compared treatment regimens and A1c levels across the two registries.
There were 4003 T1D (SEARCH = 1899; YDR = 2104) and 611 T2D (SEARCH = 384; YDR = 227) youth. The mean A1c was higher in YDR compared to SEARCH (T1D:11.0% ± 2.9% vs 7.8% ± 1.7%, P < .001; T2D:9.9% ± 2.8% vs 7.2% ± 2.1%, P < .001). Among T1D youth in SEARCH, 65.1% were on a basal/bolus regimen, whereas in YDR, 52.8% were on once/twice daily insulin regimen. Pumps were used by 16.2% of SEARCH and 1.5% of YDR youth with T1D. Among T2D youth, in SEARCH and YDR, a majority were on metformin only (43.0% vs 30.0%), followed by insulin + any oral hypoglycemic agents (26.3% vs 13.7%) and insulin only (12.8% vs 18.9%), respectively.
We found significant differences between SEARCH and YDR in treatment patterns in T1D and T2D. A1c levels were higher in YDR than SEARCH youth, for both T1D and T2D, irrespective of the regimens used. Efforts to achieve better glycemic control for youth are urgently needed to reduce the risk of long-term complications.
通过比较来自美国青少年糖尿病研究(SEARCH)和印度青少年糖尿病登记处(YDR)的两个国家的糖尿病登记处的 1 型(T1D)和 2 型糖尿病(T2D)患者的治疗方案和糖化血红蛋白(A1c)水平。
将 SEARCH 和 YDR 数据与观察医疗结局伙伴关系通用数据模型中的结构和术语进行了协调。数据来源于 2006-2012 年期间被诊断为 T1D 和 T2D 的<20 岁的青少年,2006 年、2008 年和 2012 年的 SEARCH 和 YDR。我们比较了这两个登记处的治疗方案和 A1c 水平。
共纳入 4003 例 T1D(SEARCH = 1899;YDR = 2104)和 611 例 T2D(SEARCH = 384;YDR = 227)青少年。与 SEARCH 相比,YDR 的 A1c 更高(T1D:11.0%±2.9%比 7.8%±1.7%,P<0.001;T2D:9.9%±2.8%比 7.2%±2.1%,P<0.001)。在 SEARCH 的 T1D 青少年中,65.1%采用基础/餐时胰岛素方案,而在 YDR 中,52.8%采用每日 1 或 2 次胰岛素方案。泵在 SEARCH 和 YDR 的 T1D 青少年中的使用率分别为 16.2%和 1.5%。在 T2D 青少年中,SEARCH 和 YDR 中,大多数仅使用二甲双胍(43.0%比 30.0%),其次是胰岛素+任何口服降糖药(26.3%比 13.7%)和胰岛素(12.8%比 18.9%)。
我们发现 SEARCH 和 YDR 之间在 T1D 和 T2D 的治疗模式方面存在显著差异。无论使用何种方案,YDR 的 T1D 和 T2D 青少年的 A1c 水平均高于 SEARCH 青少年。迫切需要努力实现青少年更好的血糖控制,以降低长期并发症的风险。