• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Comparison of the incidence of diabetes in United States and Indian youth: An international harmonization of youth diabetes registries.美国和印度青年人群中糖尿病发病率的比较:青年糖尿病登记处的国际协调研究。
Pediatr Diabetes. 2021 Feb;22(1):8-14. doi: 10.1111/pedi.13009. Epub 2020 Apr 6.
2
Clinical profile at diagnosis with youth-onset type 1 and type 2 diabetes in two pediatric diabetes registries: SEARCH (United States) and YDR (India).在两个儿科糖尿病注册中心(美国的 SEARCH 和印度的 YDR)中,青少年起病 1 型和 2 型糖尿病患者的诊断时临床特征。
Pediatr Diabetes. 2021 Feb;22(1):22-30. doi: 10.1111/pedi.12981. Epub 2020 Jan 29.
3
Diabetic ketoacidosis at diagnosis among youth with type 1 and type 2 diabetes: Results from SEARCH (United States) and YDR (India) registries.诊断时青少年 1 型和 2 型糖尿病的糖尿病酮症酸中毒:来自 SEARCH(美国)和 YDR(印度)登记处的结果。
Pediatr Diabetes. 2021 Feb;22(1):40-46. doi: 10.1111/pedi.12979. Epub 2020 Feb 17.
4
Treatment regimens and glycosylated hemoglobin levels in youth with Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes: Data from SEARCH (United States) and YDR (India) registries.1 型和 2 型糖尿病青少年的治疗方案和糖化血红蛋白水平:来自 SEARCH(美国)和 YDR(印度)登记处的数据。
Pediatr Diabetes. 2021 Feb;22(1):31-39. doi: 10.1111/pedi.13004. Epub 2020 Mar 24.
5
Registry of Youth Onset Diabetes in India (YDR): Rationale, Recruitment, and Current Status.印度青少年发病糖尿病登记处(YDR):基本原理、招募情况及现状
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2016 Aug 22;10(5):1034-41. doi: 10.1177/1932296816645121. Print 2016 Sep.
6
Demographic and clinical profile of youth onset diabetes patients in India-Results from the baseline data of a clinic based registry of people with diabetes in India with young age at onset-[YDR-02].印度青年发病糖尿病患者的人口统计学和临床特征——印度以年轻起病的糖尿病患者为基础的诊所登记处的基线数据结果[YDR-02]。
Pediatr Diabetes. 2021 Feb;22(1):15-21. doi: 10.1111/pedi.12973. Epub 2020 Feb 6.
7
The burden of diabetes mellitus among US youth: prevalence estimates from the SEARCH for Diabetes in Youth Study.美国青少年糖尿病负担:青少年糖尿病研究(SEARCH)的患病率估计
Pediatrics. 2006 Oct;118(4):1510-8. doi: 10.1542/peds.2006-0690.
8
Fluctuations in the incidence of type 1 diabetes in the United States from 2001 to 2015: a longitudinal study.2001年至2015年美国1型糖尿病发病率的波动:一项纵向研究。
BMC Med. 2017 Nov 8;15(1):199. doi: 10.1186/s12916-017-0958-6.
9
Diabetes in non-Hispanic white youth: prevalence, incidence, and clinical characteristics: the SEARCH for Diabetes in Youth Study.非西班牙裔白人青少年糖尿病:患病率、发病率及临床特征:青少年糖尿病研究(SEARCH)
Diabetes Care. 2009 Mar;32 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S102-11. doi: 10.2337/dc09-S202.
10
Factors influencing time to case registration for youth with type 1 and type 2 diabetes: SEARCH for Diabetes in Youth Study.影响1型和2型糖尿病青少年病例登记时间的因素:青少年糖尿病SEARCH研究
Ann Epidemiol. 2016 Sep;26(9):631-7. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2016.07.014. Epub 2016 Aug 10.

引用本文的文献

1
ICMR-MDRF Diabetes Biosamples: Cohort profile.印度医学研究理事会-多药耐药性糖尿病生物样本:队列简介。
Indian J Med Res. 2024 Nov;160(5):514-526. doi: 10.25259/IJMR_1036_2024.
2
Nutritional Guidelines for Patients with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus and its Adherence- A Narrative Review.1型糖尿病患者的营养指南及其依从性——一项叙述性综述
Indian J Endocrinol Metab. 2024 Sep-Oct;28(5):461-469. doi: 10.4103/ijem.ijem_104_24. Epub 2024 Nov 8.
3
The rising prevalence of type 2 diabetes among the youth in southern India-An ancillary analysis of the Secular TRends in DiabEtes in India (STRiDE-I) study.印度南部青年 2 型糖尿病发病率上升——印度糖尿病长期趋势(STRiDE-I)研究的辅助分析。
J Diabetes. 2024 Jul;16(7):e13576. doi: 10.1111/1753-0407.13576.
4
Youth-onset type 2 diabetes mellitus: an urgent challenge.青少年 2 型糖尿病:一个紧迫的挑战。
Nat Rev Nephrol. 2023 Mar;19(3):168-184. doi: 10.1038/s41581-022-00645-1. Epub 2022 Oct 31.
5
Transitioning care in youth-onset type 1 and type 2 diabetes: a scoping review protocol using the socio-ecological model framework.青年起病 1 型和 2 型糖尿病患者的过渡期护理:基于社会生态模型框架的范围综述方案
BMJ Open. 2022 Oct 27;12(10):e064186. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064186.
6
Pathophysiology, phenotypes and management of type 2 diabetes mellitus in Indian and Chinese populations.中国和印度人群 2 型糖尿病的病理生理学、表型和管理。
Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2022 Jul;18(7):413-432. doi: 10.1038/s41574-022-00669-4. Epub 2022 May 4.
7
Standardizing registry data to the OMOP Common Data Model: experience from three pulmonary hypertension databases.将注册数据标准化为OMOP通用数据模型:来自三个肺动脉高压数据库的经验。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2021 Nov 2;21(1):238. doi: 10.1186/s12874-021-01434-3.
8
Diabetic ketoacidosis.糖尿病酮症酸中毒。
Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2020 May 14;6(1):40. doi: 10.1038/s41572-020-0165-1.

本文引用的文献

1
Prevalence of Known Risk Factors for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Multiethnic Urban Youth in Edmonton: Findings From the WHY ACT NOW Project.埃德蒙顿多民族城市青年 2 型糖尿病已知危险因素的流行情况:“现在就行动”项目的研究结果。
Can J Diabetes. 2019 Apr;43(3):207-214. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjd.2018.10.002. Epub 2018 Oct 9.
2
Trends and cyclical variation in the incidence of childhood type 1 diabetes in 26 European centres in the 25 year period 1989-2013: a multicentre prospective registration study.26 个欧洲中心在 1989-2013 年 25 年间儿童 1 型糖尿病发病率的趋势和周期性变化:一项多中心前瞻性登记研究。
Diabetologia. 2019 Mar;62(3):408-417. doi: 10.1007/s00125-018-4763-3. Epub 2018 Nov 28.
3
Clinical management of type 2 diabetes in south Asia.南亚 2 型糖尿病的临床管理。
Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2018 Dec;6(12):979-991. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(18)30199-2. Epub 2018 Oct 1.
4
UNHEALTHY WEIGHT IN INDIAN FAMILIES: THE ROLE OF THE FAMILY ENVIRONMENT IN THE CONTEXT OF THE NUTRITION TRANSITION.印度家庭中的不健康体重:营养转型背景下家庭环境的作用
Popul Res Policy Rev. 2018 Apr;37(2):157-180. doi: 10.1007/s11113-017-9455-z. Epub 2018 Jan 25.
5
Incidence and prevalence trends of youth-onset type 2 diabetes in a cohort of Canadian youth: 2002-2013.加拿大青年队列中青少年 2 型糖尿病的发病率和患病率趋势:2002-2013 年。
Pediatr Diabetes. 2018 Jun;19(4):630-636. doi: 10.1111/pedi.12631. Epub 2017 Dec 27.
6
Type 1 diabetes incidence and prevalence trends in a cohort of Canadian children and youth.1 型糖尿病在加拿大儿童和青少年队列中的发病率和流行趋势。
Pediatr Diabetes. 2018 May;19(3):501-505. doi: 10.1111/pedi.12566. Epub 2017 Aug 31.
7
Incidence Trends of Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes among Youths, 2002-2012.2002 - 2012年间青少年1型和2型糖尿病的发病率趋势
N Engl J Med. 2017 Apr 13;376(15):1419-1429. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1610187.
8
Diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and chronic kidney disease in South Asia: current status and future directions.南亚的糖尿病、心血管疾病和慢性肾脏病:现状与未来方向
BMJ. 2017 Apr 11;357:j1420. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j1420.
9
Registry of Youth Onset Diabetes in India (YDR): Rationale, Recruitment, and Current Status.印度青少年发病糖尿病登记处(YDR):基本原理、招募情况及现状
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2016 Aug 22;10(5):1034-41. doi: 10.1177/1932296816645121. Print 2016 Sep.
10
Health Information Seeking, Source Trust, and Culture: A Comparative Analysis of Health Information Trends and Needs Between Guam and the United States.健康信息寻求、来源信任与文化:关岛与美国之间健康信息趋势和需求的比较分析
J Health Commun. 2016;21(4):469-78. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2015.1095822. Epub 2016 Mar 16.

美国和印度青年人群中糖尿病发病率的比较:青年糖尿病登记处的国际协调研究。

Comparison of the incidence of diabetes in United States and Indian youth: An international harmonization of youth diabetes registries.

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology and Prevention, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.

Department of Epidemiology, Colorado School of Public Health, University of Colorado Denver, Aurora, CO, USA.

出版信息

Pediatr Diabetes. 2021 Feb;22(1):8-14. doi: 10.1111/pedi.13009. Epub 2020 Apr 6.

DOI:10.1111/pedi.13009
PMID:32196874
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7748376/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Incidence of youth-onset diabetes in India has not been well described. Comparison of incidence, across diabetes registries, has the potential to inform hypotheses for risk factors. We sought to compare the incidence of diabetes in the U.S.-based registry of youth onset diabetes (SEARCH) to the Registry of Diabetes with Young Age at Onset (YDR-Chennai and New Delhi regions) in India.

METHODS

We harmonized data from both SEARCH and YDR to the Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership (OMOP) Common Data Model. Data were from youth registered with incident diabetes (2006-2012). Denominators were from census and membership data. We calculated diabetes incidence by averaging the total cases across the entire follow-up period and dividing this by the estimated census population corresponding to the source population for case ascertainment. Incidence was calculated for each of the registries and compared by type and within age and sex categories using a 2-sided, skew-corrected inverted score test.

RESULTS

Incidence of type 1 was higher in SEARCH (21.2 cases/100 000 [95% CI: 19.9, 22.5]) than YDR (4.9 cases/100 000 [95% CI: 4.3, 5.6]). Incidence of type 2 diabetes was also higher in SEARCH (5.9 cases/100 000 [95% CI: 5.3, 6.6] in SEARCH vs 0.5/cases/100 000 [95% CI: 0.3, 0.7] in YDR). The age distribution of incident type 1 diabetes cases was similar across registries, whereas type 2 diabetes incidence was higher at an earlier age in SEARCH. Sex differences existed in SEARCH only, with a higher rate of type 2 diabetes among females.

CONCLUSION

The incidence of youth-onset type 1 and 2 diabetes was significantly different between registries. Additional data are needed to elucidate whether the differences observed represent diagnostic delay, differences in genetic susceptibility, or differences in distribution of risk factors.

摘要

目的

印度青年发病型糖尿病的发病率尚未得到充分描述。对不同糖尿病登记处的发病率进行比较,可能有助于为危险因素假说提供信息。我们旨在比较美国青年发病型糖尿病登记处(SEARCH)和印度青年发病型糖尿病登记处(Chennai 和新德里地区)的糖尿病发病率。

方法

我们将 SEARCH 和 YDR 的数据与观察医疗结果合作组织(OMOP)通用数据模型进行了协调。数据来自 2006 年至 2012 年间登记的患有初发性糖尿病的青少年。分母来自人口普查和成员数据。我们通过在整个随访期间平均计算总病例数,并将其除以与病例确定源人群相对应的估计人口普查人数来计算糖尿病发病率。我们为每个登记处计算了发病率,并通过使用双侧、偏斜校正的倒置得分检验,按类型和年龄和性别类别进行了比较。

结果

SEARCH 中 1 型糖尿病的发病率(21.2 例/100000[95%CI:19.9,22.5])高于 YDR(4.9 例/100000[95%CI:4.3,5.6])。SEARCH 中 2 型糖尿病的发病率也更高(SEARCH 中为 5.9 例/100000[95%CI:5.3,6.6],而 YDR 中为 0.5 例/100000[95%CI:0.3,0.7])。两个登记处的 1 型糖尿病发病年龄分布相似,而 SEARCH 中 2 型糖尿病的发病年龄更早。仅在 SEARCH 中存在性别差异,女性 2 型糖尿病发病率更高。

结论

两个登记处的青年发病型 1 型和 2 型糖尿病的发病率有显著差异。需要更多的数据来阐明观察到的差异是否代表诊断延迟、遗传易感性差异还是危险因素分布差异。