Miccio-Fonseca L C
Clinic for the Sexualities, San Diego, CA, USA.
J Child Sex Abus. 2020 Apr;29(3):351-372. doi: 10.1080/10538712.2020.1733161. Epub 2020 Mar 5.
A new risk/treatment needs protocol for assessing "juveniles with sex offenses" operationalized in the Treatment Needs and Progress Scale (TNPS) was recently introduced, prompting quick embrace before any serious examination. This article critiques the proposed protocol and TNPS. Highlighted are misleading statements, substantial omissions related to review of research, and significant margins of TNPS underpinnings that cause considerable pause. Target population, essential to adopting and implementing TNPS, is not clearly stated. Multiple basic rudimentary steps are missing in the research protocol for two age groups. The "new" protocol appears to be a re-installment of the old one, applying templates from adult tools and empirical findings on adults to adolescents, thus treating youth like adults, an outdated stance in contemporary research and clinical practice related to risk assessment of sexually abusive youth..
最近推出了一种新的风险/治疗需求协议,用于评估《治疗需求与进展量表》(TNPS)中的“有性犯罪行为的青少年”,该协议在未经任何认真审查之前就迅速被采用。本文对该提议的协议和TNPS进行了批判。文中强调了误导性陈述、与研究综述相关的大量遗漏,以及TNPS基础存在的重大问题,这些都令人相当迟疑。TNPS采用和实施所必需的目标人群并未明确说明。针对两个年龄组的研究协议缺少多个基本的初步步骤。这个“新”协议似乎是旧协议的重新包装,将成人工具的模板和关于成年人的实证研究结果应用于青少年,因此将青少年像成年人一样对待,这在当代与性虐待青少年风险评估相关的研究和临床实践中是一种过时的立场。