Faculty of Physical Education and Sport, Charles University Prague, José Martího 31, 16252, Prague 6, Czech Republic.
Lattice Training Ltd., Chesterfield, Derbyshire, UK.
J Physiol Sci. 2020 Mar 5;70(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s12576-020-00742-5.
The purpose of the present study was to assess the effect of different water immersion temperatures on handgrip performance and haemodynamic changes in the forearm flexors of males and females. Twenty-nine rock-climbers performed three repeated intermittent handgrip contractions to failure with 20 min recovery on three separate laboratory visits. For each visit, a randomly assigned recovery strategy was applied: cold water immersion (CWI) at 8 °C (CW8), 15 °C (CW15) or passive recovery (PAS). While handgrip performance significantly decreased in the subsequent trials for the PAS (p < 0.05), there was a significant increase in time to failure for the second and third trial for CW15 and in the second trial for CW8; males having greater performance improvement (44%) after CW15 than females (26%). The results indicate that CW15 was a more tolerable and effective recovery strategy than CW8 and the same CWI protocol may lead to different recovery in males and females.
本研究旨在评估不同水温的浸水浴对男性和女性前臂屈肌握力表现和血液动力学变化的影响。29 名攀岩者在三次不同的实验室访问中,分别进行了三次重复间歇握力收缩至力竭,恢复 20 分钟。对于每次访问,均应用随机分配的恢复策略:8°C(CW8)、15°C(CW15)冷水浸浴(CWI)或被动恢复(PAS)。尽管 PAS 在后两次试验中握力表现明显下降(p<0.05),但 CW15 的第二次和第三次试验以及 CW8 的第二次试验的力竭时间都有所增加;与女性(26%)相比,男性在 CW15 后握力表现改善更大(44%)。结果表明,CW15 是一种比 CW8 更耐受和有效的恢复策略,相同的 CWI 方案可能会导致男性和女性的恢复不同。