• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

估算直接作用抗病毒药物治疗丙型肝炎在日本的成本节约价格。

Estimating the price at which hepatitis C treatment with direct-acting antivirals would be cost-saving in Japan.

机构信息

Massachusetts General Hospital Institute for Technology Assessment, Boston, MA, USA.

Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2020 Mar 5;10(1):4089. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-60986-4.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-020-60986-4
PMID:32139872
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7058050/
Abstract

In Japan, 1.5-2 million people are chronically infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. New direct-acting antiviral agents (DAA) offer an unprecedented opportunity to cure HCV. While the price of HCV treatment decreased recently in most countries, it remains one of the highest in Japan. Our objective was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of HCV treatment in patients of different age groups and to estimate the price at which DAAs become cost-saving in Japan. A previously developed microsimulation model was adapted to the Japanese population and updated with Japan-specific health utilities and costs. Our model showed that compared with no treatment, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of DAAs at a price USD 41,046 per treatment was USD 9,080 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained in 60-year-old patients. HCV treatment became cost-effective after 9 years of starting treatment. However, if the price of DAAs is reduced by 55-85% (USD 6,730 to 17,720), HCV treatment would be cost-saving within a 5 to 20-year time horizon, which should serve to increase the uptake of DAA-based HCV treatment. The payers of health care in Japan could examine ways to procure DAAs at a price where they would be cost-saving.

摘要

在日本,有 150 万至 200 万人慢性感染丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)。新型直接作用抗病毒药物(DAA)为治愈 HCV 提供了前所未有的机会。尽管最近大多数国家的 HCV 治疗价格有所下降,但在日本仍处于较高水平。我们的目标是评估不同年龄组 HCV 治疗的成本效益,并估算 DAA 的价格在何时能使治疗具有成本效益。我们使用一种预先开发的微模拟模型来评估日本人群,并根据日本特有的健康效用和成本进行了更新。我们的模型显示,与不治疗相比,60 岁患者以 41046 美元/疗程的价格使用 DAA 的增量成本效益比(ICER)为每获得 1 个质量调整生命年(QALY)的成本为 9080 美元。如果开始治疗后 9 年内 HCV 治疗的成本效益比超过 1,那么 HCV 治疗就具有成本效益。然而,如果 DAA 的价格降低 55-85%(6730 美元至 17720 美元),在 5 至 20 年内 HCV 治疗就具有成本效益,这将有助于增加 DAA 为基础的 HCV 治疗的应用。日本的医疗保健支付者可以考虑以具有成本效益的价格采购 DAA。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a61a/7058050/2d43174ac12e/41598_2020_60986_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a61a/7058050/8cb09ef347bd/41598_2020_60986_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a61a/7058050/d6275ed2738f/41598_2020_60986_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a61a/7058050/a0b6e610bcc9/41598_2020_60986_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a61a/7058050/2d43174ac12e/41598_2020_60986_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a61a/7058050/8cb09ef347bd/41598_2020_60986_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a61a/7058050/d6275ed2738f/41598_2020_60986_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a61a/7058050/a0b6e610bcc9/41598_2020_60986_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a61a/7058050/2d43174ac12e/41598_2020_60986_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Estimating the price at which hepatitis C treatment with direct-acting antivirals would be cost-saving in Japan.估算直接作用抗病毒药物治疗丙型肝炎在日本的成本节约价格。
Sci Rep. 2020 Mar 5;10(1):4089. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-60986-4.
2
Cost-effectiveness of generic pan-genotypic sofosbuvir/velpatasvir versus genotype-dependent direct-acting antivirals for hepatitis C treatment.通用泛基因型索磷布韦/维帕他韦与基于基因型的直接作用抗病毒药物治疗丙型肝炎的成本效益比较。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 Dec;33(12):2029-2036. doi: 10.1111/jgh.14301. Epub 2018 Jun 25.
3
Cost-effectiveness of integrated treatment for hepatitis C virus (HCV) among people who inject drugs in Norway: An economic evaluation of the INTRO-HCV trial.挪威注射吸毒人群丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)综合治疗的成本效益:INTRO-HCV 试验的经济学评价。
Addiction. 2023 Dec;118(12):2424-2439. doi: 10.1111/add.16305. Epub 2023 Jul 29.
4
Economic evaluation of the hepatitis C elimination strategy in Greece in the era of affordable direct-acting antivirals.在可负担得起的直接抗病毒药物时代,希腊丙型肝炎消除策略的经济评估。
World J Gastroenterol. 2019 Mar 21;25(11):1327-1340. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i11.1327.
5
Early treatment of acute hepatitis C infection is cost-effective in HIV-infected men-who-have-sex-with-men.早期治疗急性丙型肝炎感染在感染 HIV 的男男性行为者中具有成本效益。
PLoS One. 2019 Jan 10;14(1):e0210179. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0210179. eCollection 2019.
6
Direct-Acting Antiviral Agents for Patients With Hepatitis C Virus Genotype 1 Infection Are Cost-Saving.直接作用抗病毒药物治疗丙型肝炎病毒 1 型感染具有成本效益。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 Jun;15(6):827-837.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2016.09.015. Epub 2016 Sep 17.
7
Systematic review: cost-effectiveness of direct-acting antivirals for treatment of hepatitis C genotypes 2-6.系统评价:直接抗病毒药物治疗丙型肝炎2-6型的成本效益
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2017 Oct;46(8):711-721. doi: 10.1111/apt.14271. Epub 2017 Aug 24.
8
Cost-effectiveness of hepatitis C treatment using generic direct-acting antivirals available in India.使用印度可获得的通用直接作用抗病毒药物治疗丙型肝炎的成本效益。
PLoS One. 2017 May 17;12(5):e0176503. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0176503. eCollection 2017.
9
Should we treat acute hepatitis C? A decision and cost-effectiveness analysis.我们是否应该治疗急性丙型肝炎?决策与成本效益分析。
Hepatology. 2018 Mar;67(3):837-846. doi: 10.1002/hep.29611. Epub 2018 Jan 24.
10
Economic and epidemiological evaluation of interventions to reduce the burden of hepatitis C in Yunnan province, China.中国云南省减轻丙型肝炎负担干预措施的经济与流行病学评估
PLoS One. 2021 Jan 13;16(1):e0245288. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245288. eCollection 2021.

引用本文的文献

1
Economic evaluation of the Hepatitis C virus elimination program in the country of Georgia, 2015 to 2017.2015 年至 2017 年格鲁吉亚国家丙型肝炎病毒消除计划的经济评估。
Liver Int. 2023 Mar;43(3):558-568. doi: 10.1111/liv.15431. Epub 2022 Oct 4.
2
Modeling-Based Response-Guided DAA Therapy for Chronic Hepatitis C to Identify Individuals for Shortening Treatment Duration.基于模型的应答引导直接抗病毒药物疗法治疗慢性丙型肝炎以确定可缩短治疗疗程的个体。
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2022 Mar 22;9(5):ofac157. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofac157. eCollection 2022 May.
3
Hepatitis C virus: A critical approach to who really needs treatment.

本文引用的文献

1
Assessment of the Feasibility and Cost of Hepatitis C Elimination in Pakistan.评估在巴基斯坦消除丙型肝炎的可行性和成本。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 May 3;2(5):e193613. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.3613.
2
Alternative State-Level Financing for Hepatitis C Treatment-The "Netflix Model".丙型肝炎治疗的替代性州级融资——“奈飞模式”
JAMA. 2018 Nov 20;320(19):1977-1978. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.15782.
3
A Novel Strategy for Increasing Access to Treatment for Hepatitis C Virus Infection for Medicaid Beneficiaries.一种增加医疗补助受益人获得丙型肝炎病毒感染治疗机会的新策略。
丙型肝炎病毒:关于真正需要治疗人群的关键探讨。
World J Hepatol. 2022 Jan 27;14(1):1-44. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v14.i1.1.
4
Role of Serum Vitamin D, Interleukin 13, and microRNA-135a in Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Treatment Failure in Egyptian HCV-Infected Patients Receiving Direct Antiviral Agents.血清维生素 D、白细胞介素 13 和 microRNA-135a 在埃及 HCV 感染患者接受直接抗病毒药物治疗中对肝癌及治疗失败的作用。
Viruses. 2021 Oct 6;13(10):2008. doi: 10.3390/v13102008.
5
Hepatitis C Virus Translation Regulation.丙型肝炎病毒翻译调控。
Int J Mol Sci. 2020 Mar 27;21(7):2328. doi: 10.3390/ijms21072328.
Ann Intern Med. 2018 Jul 17;169(2):118-119. doi: 10.7326/M18-0186. Epub 2018 May 15.
4
Cost-effectiveness analyses of anti-hepatitis C virus treatments using quality of life scoring among patients with chronic liver disease in Hiroshima prefecture, Japan.日本广岛县慢性肝病患者中使用生活质量评分的抗丙型肝炎病毒治疗的成本效益分析。
Hepatol Res. 2018 Jun;48(7):509-520. doi: 10.1111/hepr.13053. Epub 2018 Feb 17.
5
Assessing the Budget Impact and Economic Outcomes of the Introduction of Daclatasvir + Asunaprevir and Sofosbuvir/Ledipasvir for the Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis C Virus Infection in Japan.评估在日本引入达卡他韦+阿舒瑞韦以及索磷布韦/来迪派韦治疗慢性丙型肝炎病毒感染的预算影响和经济结果。
Value Health Reg Issues. 2017 May;12:1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.vhri.2016.10.002. Epub 2016 Dec 24.
6
Cost-effectiveness of hepatitis C treatment using generic direct-acting antivirals available in India.使用印度可获得的通用直接作用抗病毒药物治疗丙型肝炎的成本效益。
PLoS One. 2017 May 17;12(5):e0176503. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0176503. eCollection 2017.
7
Cost-utility analysis of ledipasvir/sofosbuvir for the treatment of genotype 1 chronic hepatitis C in Japan.在日本,ledipasvir/sofosbuvir治疗基因1型慢性丙型肝炎的成本效用分析。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2017 Jan;33(1):11-21. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2016.1222513. Epub 2016 Sep 9.
8
Cost-utility analysis of sofosbuvir for the treatment of genotype 2 chronic hepatitis C in Japan.索磷布韦治疗日本基因2型慢性丙型肝炎的成本效用分析。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2017 Jan;33(1):1-10. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2016.1222512. Epub 2016 Sep 8.
9
Cost-effectiveness of direct-acting antiviral regimen ombitasvir/paritaprevir/ritonavir in treatment-naïve and treatment-experienced patients infected with chronic hepatitis C virus genotype 1b in Japan.在日本,直接抗病毒药物ombitasvir/paritaprevir/ritonavir方案用于初治和经治的慢性丙型肝炎病毒1b型感染患者的成本效益分析
J Med Econ. 2016 Dec;19(12):1144-1156. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2016.1206908. Epub 2016 Jul 25.
10
The cost-effectiveness of daclatasvir-based regimens for the treatment of hepatitis C virus genotypes 1 and 4 in the UK.在英国,基于达卡他韦的治疗方案用于治疗丙型肝炎病毒1型和4型的成本效益。
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016 Feb;28(2):173-80. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000000510.