• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

读者对维基百科上医学内容的参与度。

Reader engagement with medical content on Wikipedia.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, United States.

Lane Medical Library, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, United States.

出版信息

Elife. 2020 Mar 6;9:e52426. doi: 10.7554/eLife.52426.

DOI:10.7554/eLife.52426
PMID:32142406
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7089765/
Abstract

Articles on Wikipedia about health and medicine are maintained by WikiProject Medicine (WPM), and are widely used by health professionals, students and others. We have compared these articles, and reader engagement with them, to other articles on Wikipedia. We found that WPM articles are longer, possess a greater density of external links, and are visited more often than other articles on Wikipedia. Readers of WPM articles are more likely to hover over and view footnotes than other readers, but are less likely to visit the hyperlinked sources in these footnotes. Our findings suggest that WPM readers appear to use links to external sources to verify and authorize Wikipedia content, rather than to examine the sources themselves.

摘要

维基百科上关于健康和医学的文章由维基医学项目(WPM)维护,被健康专业人士、学生和其他人员广泛使用。我们将这些文章与维基百科上的其他文章进行了比较,并比较了读者对它们的参与度。我们发现,WPM 文章篇幅更长,外部链接密度更大,访问量也高于维基百科上的其他文章。WPM 文章的读者比其他读者更有可能悬停并查看脚注,但不太可能访问这些脚注中的超链接来源。我们的研究结果表明,WPM 的读者似乎使用外部链接来验证和授权维基百科的内容,而不是检查这些来源本身。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e2b/7089765/793d5ba4f29f/elife-52426-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e2b/7089765/ab4459c7b8b9/elife-52426-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e2b/7089765/7fbe4cf16ab9/elife-52426-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e2b/7089765/793d5ba4f29f/elife-52426-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e2b/7089765/ab4459c7b8b9/elife-52426-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e2b/7089765/7fbe4cf16ab9/elife-52426-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e2b/7089765/793d5ba4f29f/elife-52426-fig3.jpg

相似文献

1
Reader engagement with medical content on Wikipedia.读者对维基百科上医学内容的参与度。
Elife. 2020 Mar 6;9:e52426. doi: 10.7554/eLife.52426.
2
'WP2Cochrane', a tool linking Wikipedia to the Cochrane Library: Results of a bibliometric analysis evaluating article quality and importance.WP2Cochrane,一种将维基百科与考科蓝图书馆链接起来的工具:对文章质量和重要性进行文献计量分析的结果。
Health Informatics J. 2020 Sep;26(3):1881-1897. doi: 10.1177/1460458219892711. Epub 2019 Dec 23.
3
Why Medical Schools Should Embrace Wikipedia: Final-Year Medical Student Contributions to Wikipedia Articles for Academic Credit at One School.医学院为何应接纳维基百科:一所学校的医学专业大四学生为获取学术学分而对维基百科文章所做的贡献
Acad Med. 2017 Feb;92(2):194-200. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001381.
4
Quality of Male and Female Medical Content on English-Language Wikipedia: Quantitative Content Analysis.英文-维基百科上的男性和女性医学内容质量:定量内容分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Sep 12;26:e47562. doi: 10.2196/47562.
5
The Most Influential Medical Journals According to Wikipedia: Quantitative Analysis.维基百科所评选的最具影响力医学期刊:定量分析
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Jan 18;21(1):e11429. doi: 10.2196/11429.
6
Analysis of reference sources used in drug-related Wikipedia articles.药物相关维基百科文章中使用的参考文献来源分析。
J Med Libr Assoc. 2015 Jul;103(3):140-4. doi: 10.3163/1536-5050.103.3.007.
7
Wikipedia and medicine: quantifying readership, editors, and the significance of natural language.维基百科与医学:量化读者数量、编辑人员以及自然语言的重要性
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Mar 4;17(3):e62. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4069.
8
An evaluation of Wikipedia as a resource for patient education in nephrology.维基百科作为肾脏病患者教育资源的评估。
Semin Dial. 2013 Mar-Apr;26(2):159-63. doi: 10.1111/sdi.12059. Epub 2013 Feb 22.
9
Evaluation of gastroenterology and hepatology articles on Wikipedia: are they suitable as learning resources for medical students?评价维基百科上的胃肠病学和肝脏病学文章:它们是否适合作为医学生的学习资源?
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014 Feb;26(2):155-63. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000000003.
10
Wikipedia vs peer-reviewed medical literature for information about the 10 most costly medical conditions.关于10种最昂贵医疗状况的信息,维基百科与同行评审医学文献的比较。
J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2014 May;114(5):368-73. doi: 10.7556/jaoa.2014.035.

引用本文的文献

1
Developing a scalable framework for partnerships between health agencies and the Wikimedia ecosystem.为卫生机构与维基媒体生态系统之间的伙伴关系开发一个可扩展的框架。
Res Ideas Outcomes. 2021 Jun 6;7. doi: 10.3897/rio.7.e68121.
2
Strategies for crowdsourcing hearing health information: a comparative study of educational programs and volunteer-based campaigns on Wikimedia.众包听力健康信息的策略:Wikimedia 上教育项目和志愿者活动的比较研究。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Sep 30;24(1):2646. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-20105-8.
3
Wikipedia as a tool for contemporary history of science: A case study on CRISPR.

本文引用的文献

1
Pharmacy students can improve access to quality medicines information by editing Wikipedia articles.药学专业学生可以通过编辑维基百科上的文章来提高获取高质量药品信息的途径。
BMC Med Educ. 2018 Nov 20;18(1):265. doi: 10.1186/s12909-018-1375-z.
2
The state of OA: a large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles.开放获取(OA)的现状:对开放获取文章的患病率和影响的大规模分析。
PeerJ. 2018 Feb 13;6:e4375. doi: 10.7717/peerj.4375. eCollection 2018.
3
Wikipedia as a gateway to biomedical research: The relative distribution and use of citations in the English Wikipedia.
维基百科作为科学当代史的工具:以 CRISPR 为例。
PLoS One. 2023 Sep 13;18(9):e0290827. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0290827. eCollection 2023.
4
Citation needed? Wikipedia bibliometrics during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic.需要引用?COVID-19 大流行第一波期间的维基百科文献计量学。
Gigascience. 2022 Jan 12;11(1). doi: 10.1093/gigascience/giab095.
5
Diagnosis of Taenia solium infections based on "mail order" RNA-sequencing of single tapeworm egg isolates from stool samples.基于粪便样本中单条带绦虫卵分离物的“邮购” RNA 测序诊断猪带绦虫感染。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2021 Dec 10;15(12):e0009787. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0009787. eCollection 2021 Dec.
6
Wikipedia: A Medical Student Educational Project to Edit Wikipedia in Preparation for Practicing Evidence-Based Pain Medicine.维基百科:一个医学生教育项目,通过编辑维基百科为实施循证疼痛医学做准备。
J Med Educ Curric Dev. 2020 Sep 22;7:2382120520959691. doi: 10.1177/2382120520959691. eCollection 2020 Jan-Dec.
7
Scientometric trends for coronaviruses and other emerging viral infections.冠状病毒和其他新发病毒性传染病的科学计量学趋势。
Gigascience. 2020 Aug 1;9(8). doi: 10.1093/gigascience/giaa085.
维基百科作为生物医学研究的入口:英文维基百科中引用的相对分布与使用情况
PLoS One. 2017 Dec 21;12(12):e0190046. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0190046. eCollection 2017.
4
Comparison of the Impact of Wikipedia, UpToDate, and a Digital Textbook on Short-Term Knowledge Acquisition Among Medical Students: Randomized Controlled Trial of Three Web-Based Resources.维基百科、UpToDate和数字教科书对医学生短期知识获取影响的比较:三种基于网络资源的随机对照试验
JMIR Med Educ. 2017 Oct 31;3(2):e20. doi: 10.2196/mededu.8188.
5
Qualitative study of physicians' varied uses of biomedical research in the USA.美国医生对生物医学研究多种用途的定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2016 Nov 21;6(11):e012846. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012846.
6
Why Medical Schools Should Embrace Wikipedia: Final-Year Medical Student Contributions to Wikipedia Articles for Academic Credit at One School.医学院为何应接纳维基百科:一所学校的医学专业大四学生为获取学术学分而对维基百科文章所做的贡献
Acad Med. 2017 Feb;92(2):194-200. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001381.
7
Learning management system and e-learning tools: an experience of medical students' usage and expectations.学习管理系统与电子学习工具:医学生使用情况及期望的一项经验
Int J Med Educ. 2016 Aug 20;7:267-73. doi: 10.5116/ijme.57a5.f0f5.
8
In an Age of Open Access to Research Policies: Physician and Public Health NGO Staff Research Use and Policy Awareness.在研究政策开放获取的时代:医生与公共卫生非政府组织工作人员的研究使用情况及政策认知
PLoS One. 2015 Jul 22;10(7):e0129708. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0129708. eCollection 2015.
9
Wikipedia and medicine: quantifying readership, editors, and the significance of natural language.维基百科与医学:量化读者数量、编辑人员以及自然语言的重要性
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Mar 4;17(3):e62. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4069.
10
The Internet School of Medicine: use of electronic resources by medical trainees and the reliability of those resources.互联网医学院:医学实习生对电子资源的使用及其资源的可靠性
J Surg Educ. 2015 Mar-Apr;72(2):316-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2014.08.005. Epub 2014 Dec 6.