Suppr超能文献

口服前列环素治疗的肺动脉高压患者的药物依从性与医疗费用:一项回顾性队列研究

Medication Adherence and Healthcare Costs Among Patients with Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Treated with Oral Prostacyclins: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

作者信息

Dean Bonnie B, Saundankar Vishal, Stafkey-Mailey Dana, Anguiano Rebekah H, Nelsen Andrew C, Gordon Kathryn, Classi Peter

机构信息

Xcenda, LLC, Palm Harbor, FL, USA.

College of Pharmacy, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.

出版信息

Drugs Real World Outcomes. 2020 Sep;7(3):229-239. doi: 10.1007/s40801-020-00183-x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Given the improved convenience of oral prostacyclins, there is a shift toward their use in treating pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH).

OBJECTIVES

Our objective was to compare patient characteristics, medication adherence, healthcare resource use (HCRU), and costs among patients receiving oral treprostinil or selexipag.

METHODS

We used Truven Health MarketScan Commercial and Medicare databases to identify patients with PAH with a diagnosis code for pulmonary hypertension (PH) plus a prescription for oral treprostinil or selexipag from July 2013 to September 2017. Medication adherence, persistence, and all-cause and PAH-related HCRU and costs were compared between cohorts during the 6-month follow-up. Adjusted healthcare costs were obtained using recycled predictions and bootstrapped samples.

RESULTS

A total of 256 (130 oral treprostinil, 126 selexipag) patients fulfilled the study criteria. The oral treprostinil cohort was more likely to be male, to have previously used parenteral prostacyclins, and to have higher outpatient costs at baseline than the selexipag cohort. During follow-up, both cohorts had similar proportions of patients who were adherent to and persistent with their respective therapies. All-cause and PAH-related medical utilization was generally similar between cohorts. The oral treprostinil cohort had 66.9% lower total PAH-related healthcare costs (mean difference - $75,183; 95% confidence interval [CI] - 102,584 to - 49,771) and 70.6% lower PAH-related pharmacy costs (mean difference - $76,439; 95% CI - 104,512 to - 51,458) than the selexipag cohort, with similar differences in all-cause healthcare and pharmacy costs.

CONCLUSIONS

Lower all-cause and PAH-related total healthcare and pharmacy costs were observed in patients receiving oral treprostinil compared with those receiving selexipag. It will be important to study longer-term costs and clinical outcomes.

摘要

背景

鉴于口服前列环素的便利性有所提高,在治疗肺动脉高压(PAH)方面有向使用此类药物转变的趋势。

目的

我们的目的是比较接受口服曲前列尼尔或司来帕格治疗的患者的特征、药物依从性、医疗资源使用(HCRU)和成本。

方法

我们使用Truven Health MarketScan商业和医疗保险数据库,从2013年7月至2017年9月识别患有PAH且有肺动脉高压(PH)诊断代码以及口服曲前列尼尔或司来帕格处方的患者。在6个月的随访期间,比较各队列之间的药物依从性、持续性以及全因和PAH相关的HCRU及成本。使用重复预测和自抽样获得调整后的医疗成本。

结果

共有256名(130名口服曲前列尼尔,126名司来帕格)患者符合研究标准。与司来帕格队列相比,口服曲前列尼尔队列男性更多,既往使用过胃肠外前列环素,且基线时门诊成本更高。在随访期间,两个队列中坚持各自治疗方案和持续治疗的患者比例相似。各队列之间全因和PAH相关的医疗利用情况总体相似。与司来帕格队列相比,口服曲前列尼尔队列的PAH相关总医疗成本降低了66.9%(平均差值 - 75,183美元;95%置信区间[CI] - 102,584至 - 49,771),PAH相关药房成本降低了70.6%(平均差值 - 76,439美元;95%CI - 104,512至 - 51,458),全因医疗和药房成本也有类似差异。

结论

与接受司来帕格治疗的患者相比,接受口服曲前列尼尔治疗的患者全因和PAH相关的总医疗和药房成本更低。研究长期成本和临床结局将很重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ccd/7392967/58e96fbc779d/40801_2020_183_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验