Fu Binjie, Wang Guoshu, Wu Mingyue, Li Wangjia, Zheng Yineng, Chu Zhigang, Lv Fajin
Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 400016, China.
School of Public Health and Management, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 400016, China.
Eur J Radiol. 2020 May;126:108928. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2020.108928. Epub 2020 Mar 2.
To investigate the effective dose (E) and convolution kernel's effects on the detection of pulmonary nodules in different artificial intelligence (AI) software systems.
Simulated nodules of various sizes and densities in the Lungman phantom were CT scanned at different levels of E (3 - 5, 1 - 3, 0.5 - 1, and <0.5 mSv) and were reconstructed with different kernels (B30f, B60f, and B80f). The number of nodules and corresponding volumes in different images were detected by four AI software systems (A, B, C, and D). Sensitivity, false positives (FPs), false negatives (FNs), and relative volume error (RVE) were calculated and compared to the aspects of the E and convolution kernel.
System B had the highest median sensitivity (100 %). The median FPs of systems B (1) and D (1) was lower than A (11.5) and C (5). System D had the smallest RVE (13.12 %). When the E was <0.5 mSv, system D's sensitivity decreased, while the FPs and FNs of systems A and B increased significantly (P < 0.05). When the kernel was changed from B80f to B30f, the FPs of system A decreased, while that of system C increased, and the RVE of systems A, B, and C increased (P < 0.05).
AI software systems B and D have high detection efficiency under normal or low dose conditions and show better stability. However, the detection efficiency of systems A and C would be affected by the E or convolution kernel, but the E would not affect the volume measurement of four systems.
研究有效剂量(E)和卷积核在不同人工智能(AI)软件系统中对肺结节检测的影响。
在Lungman体模中模拟不同大小和密度的结节,在不同E水平(3 - 5、1 - 3、0.5 - 1和<0.5 mSv)下进行CT扫描,并用不同的核(B30f、B60f和B80f)重建。通过四个AI软件系统(A、B、C和D)检测不同图像中的结节数量和相应体积。计算敏感性、假阳性(FPs)、假阴性(FNs)和相对体积误差(RVE),并与E和卷积核方面进行比较。
系统B的中位敏感性最高(100%)。系统B(1)和D(1)的中位FPs低于A(11.5)和C(5)。系统D的RVE最小(13.12%)。当E<0.5 mSv时,系统D的敏感性降低,而系统A和B的FPs和FNs显著增加(P<0.05)。当核从B80f变为B30f时,系统A的FPs降低,而系统C的FPs增加,系统A、B和C的RVE增加(P<0.05)。
AI软件系统B和D在正常或低剂量条件下具有较高的检测效率,且稳定性较好。然而,系统A和C的检测效率会受到E或卷积核的影响,但E不会影响四个系统的体积测量。