• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

持续质量改进方法:多学科协作改善衣原体筛查的案例研究

Continuous quality improvement methodology: a case study on multidisciplinary collaboration to improve chlamydia screening.

作者信息

Ursu Allison, Greenberg Grant, McKee Michael

机构信息

Department of Family Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.

Department of Family Medicine, Lehigh Valley Health Network, Allentown, Pennsylvania, USA.

出版信息

Fam Med Community Health. 2019 Mar 25;7(2):e000085. doi: 10.1136/fmch-2018-000085. eCollection 2019.

DOI:10.1136/fmch-2018-000085
PMID:32148708
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6910742/
Abstract

This article illustrates quality improvement (QI) methodology using an example intended to improve chlamydia screening in women. QI projects in healthcare provide great opportunities to improve patient quality and safety in a real-world healthcare setting, yet many academic centres lack training programmes on how to conduct QI projects. The choice of chlamydia screening was based on the significant health burden chlamydia poses despite simple ways to screen and treat. At the University of Michigan, we implemented a multidepartment process to improve the chlamydia screening rates using the plan-do-check-act model. Steps to guide QI projects include the following: (1) assemble a motivated team of stakeholders and leaders; (2) identify the problem that is considered a high priority; (3) prepare for the project including support and resources; (4) set a goal and ways to evaluate outcomes; (5) identify the root cause(s) of the problem and prioritise based on impact and effort to address; (6) develop a countermeasure that addresses the selected root cause effectively; (7) pilot a small-scale project to assess for possible modifications; (8) large-scale roll-out including education on how to implement the project; and (9) assess and modify the process with a feedback mechanism. Using this nine-step process, chlamydia screening rates increased from 29% to 60%. QI projects differ from most clinical research projects by allowing clinicians to directly improve patients' health while contributing to the medical science body. This may interest clinicians wishing to conduct relevant research that can be disseminated through academic channels.

摘要

本文通过一个旨在改善女性衣原体筛查的例子来说明质量改进(QI)方法。医疗保健领域的QI项目为在实际医疗环境中提高患者质量和安全性提供了巨大机会,但许多学术中心缺乏关于如何开展QI项目的培训计划。选择衣原体筛查是基于尽管有简单的筛查和治疗方法,但衣原体仍带来的重大健康负担。在密歇根大学,我们采用计划-执行-检查-行动模型实施了一个多部门流程来提高衣原体筛查率。指导QI项目的步骤如下:(1)组建一个由利益相关者和领导者组成的积极团队;(2)确定被视为高度优先的问题;(3)为项目做准备,包括支持和资源;(4)设定目标和评估结果的方法;(5)确定问题的根本原因,并根据解决问题的影响和努力程度进行优先级排序;(6)制定一项能有效解决所选根本原因的对策;(7)进行小规模试点项目以评估可能的修改;(8)大规模推广,包括关于如何实施该项目的培训;(9)通过反馈机制评估和修改流程。通过这个九步流程,衣原体筛查率从29%提高到了60%。QI项目与大多数临床研究项目不同,它允许临床医生在为医学科学做出贡献的同时直接改善患者健康。这可能会引起希望开展可通过学术渠道传播的相关研究的临床医生的兴趣。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11ab/6910742/18c773cd2c02/fmch-2018-000085f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11ab/6910742/b9a64e5eb5de/fmch-2018-000085f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11ab/6910742/d00f9360d18d/fmch-2018-000085f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11ab/6910742/18c773cd2c02/fmch-2018-000085f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11ab/6910742/b9a64e5eb5de/fmch-2018-000085f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11ab/6910742/d00f9360d18d/fmch-2018-000085f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11ab/6910742/18c773cd2c02/fmch-2018-000085f03.jpg

相似文献

1
Continuous quality improvement methodology: a case study on multidisciplinary collaboration to improve chlamydia screening.持续质量改进方法:多学科协作改善衣原体筛查的案例研究
Fam Med Community Health. 2019 Mar 25;7(2):e000085. doi: 10.1136/fmch-2018-000085. eCollection 2019.
2
The NCI All Ireland Cancer Conference.美国国家癌症研究所全爱尔兰癌症会议。
Oncologist. 1999;4(4):275-277.
3
Integrating Quality Improvement and Continuing Professional Development at an Academic Medical Center: A Partnership Between Practice Plan, Hospital, and Medical School.在学术医疗中心整合质量改进与持续专业发展:实践计划、医院和医学院之间的合作关系。
J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2016 Fall;36(4):307-315. doi: 10.1097/CEH.0000000000000118.
4
Quality improvement primer part 1: Preparing for a quality improvement project in the emergency department.质量改进基础教程 1 部分:在急诊部准备质量改进项目。
CJEM. 2018 Jan;20(1):104-111. doi: 10.1017/cem.2017.361. Epub 2017 Jul 31.
5
Practice-Based Quality Improvement Collaborative to Increase Chlamydia Screening in Young Women.基于实践的质量改进协作项目以增加年轻女性衣原体筛查
Pediatrics. 2016 May;137(5). doi: 10.1542/peds.2015-1082.
6
Primer Part 1 - Preparing a laboratory quality improvement project.第 1 部分基础篇 1 - 准备一个实验室质量改进项目。
Clin Biochem. 2024 May;127-128:110764. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2024.110764. Epub 2024 Apr 16.
7
Quality improvement education incorporated as an integral part of critical care fellows training at the Mayo Clinic.质量改进教育作为梅奥诊所重症医学专科培训学员培训的一个组成部分。
Acad Med. 2014 Oct;89(10):1362-5. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000398.
8
A two-pronged quality improvement training program for leaders and frontline staff.针对领导者和一线员工的双管齐下的质量改进培训计划。
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2011 Apr;37(4):147-53. doi: 10.1016/s1553-7250(11)37018-3.
9
Implementation of quality improvement skills by primary care teams: case study of a large academic practice.基层医疗团队质量改进技能的实施:大型学术实践案例研究
J Prim Care Community Health. 2014 Apr 1;5(2):101-6. doi: 10.1177/2150131913520601. Epub 2014 Jan 27.
10
Enhancing emergency medicine initiatives with a quality improvement program: lessons learned in the emergency department of Tikur Anbessa Hospital, Addis Ababa Ethiopia.通过质量改进计划加强急诊医学举措:埃塞俄比亚亚的斯亚贝巴提库尔·安贝萨医院急诊科的经验教训
Ethiop Med J. 2014 Jul;Suppl 2:37-44.

引用本文的文献

1
Process mapping with failure mode and effects analysis to identify determinants of implementation in healthcare settings: a guide.运用失效模式与效应分析进行流程映射以确定医疗环境中实施的决定因素:指南
Implement Sci Commun. 2024 Oct 8;5(1):110. doi: 10.1186/s43058-024-00642-4.
2
A scoping review of continuous quality improvement in healthcare system: conceptualization, models and tools, barriers and facilitators, and impact.医疗保健系统持续质量改进的范围综述:概念化、模型和工具、障碍和促进因素以及影响。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Apr 19;24(1):487. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-10828-0.
3
Systematic Decision-Making for Using Technological Strategies to Implement Evidence-Based Interventions: An Illustrated Case Study.

本文引用的文献

1
Mixed methods and survey research in family medicine and community health.家庭医学与社区卫生中的混合方法和调查研究。
Fam Med Community Health. 2019 Mar 28;7(2):e000086. doi: 10.1136/fmch-2018-000086. eCollection 2019.
2
Conducting health policy analysis in primary care research: turning clinical ideas into action.在初级保健研究中开展卫生政策分析:将临床想法转化为行动。
Fam Med Community Health. 2019 Mar 22;7(2):e000076. doi: 10.1136/fmch-2018-000076. eCollection 2019.
3
Semistructured interviewing in primary care research: a balance of relationship and rigour.
运用技术策略实施循证干预的系统决策:一个实例说明的案例研究。
Front Psychiatry. 2021 May 14;12:640240. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.640240. eCollection 2021.
4
Response to letter by Lingping Zhu: Small 'r' research as big 'R' research in general practice.对朱灵萍来信的回应:全科医疗中的“小r”研究即“大R”研究。
Fam Med Community Health. 2019 Sep 16;7(3):e000218. doi: 10.1136/fmch-2019-000218. eCollection 2019.
5
Discovering and doing family medicine and community health research.开展家庭医学与社区健康研究。
Fam Med Community Health. 2019 Mar 30;7(2):e000084. doi: 10.1136/fmch-2018-000084. eCollection 2019.
6
Getting started in primary care research: choosing among six practical research approaches.初级保健研究入门:在六种实用研究方法中进行选择。
Fam Med Community Health. 2019 Mar 30;7(2):e000042. doi: 10.1136/fmch-2018-000042. eCollection 2019.
初级保健研究中的半结构化访谈:关系与严谨性的平衡。
Fam Med Community Health. 2019 Mar 8;7(2):e000057. doi: 10.1136/fmch-2018-000057. eCollection 2019.
4
Screenings during Well-Child Visits in Primary Care: A Quality Improvement Study.儿童保健常规就诊中的筛查:一项质量改进研究。
J Am Board Fam Med. 2018 Jul-Aug;31(4):558-569. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2018.04.170222.
5
SQUIRE 2.0 (Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence): revised publication guidelines from a detailed consensus process.SQUIRE 2.0(卓越质量改进报告标准):通过详细的共识过程制定的修订版出版指南。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2016 Dec;25(12):986-992. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004411. Epub 2015 Sep 14.
6
Screening and treating Chlamydia trachomatis genital infection to prevent pelvic inflammatory disease: interpretation of findings from randomized controlled trials.筛查和治疗沙眼衣原体生殖器感染以预防盆腔炎:随机对照试验结果解读。
Sex Transm Dis. 2013 Feb;40(2):97-102. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0b013e31827bd637.
7
Can we evaluate population screening strategies in UK general practice? A pilot randomised controlled trial comparing postal and opportunistic screening for genital chlamydial infection.我们能否在英国的全科医疗中评估人群筛查策略?一项比较邮寄筛查和机会性筛查衣原体感染的随机对照试验试点。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2005 Mar;59(3):198-204. doi: 10.1136/jech.2004.021584.
8
From epidemiological synergy to public health policy and practice: the contribution of other sexually transmitted diseases to sexual transmission of HIV infection.从流行病学协同作用到公共卫生政策与实践:其他性传播疾病对艾滋病毒感染性传播的影响
Sex Transm Infect. 1999 Feb;75(1):3-17. doi: 10.1136/sti.75.1.3.