• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种用于评估鱼类福利的偏好测试标准化方案。

A Standardized Protocol for Preference Testing to Assess Fish Welfare.

作者信息

DePasquale Cairsty, Sturgill Jennifer, Braithwaite Victoria A

机构信息

Department of Biology, Pennsylvania State University - Altoona;

Department of Biology, Pennsylvania State University - Altoona.

出版信息

J Vis Exp. 2020 Feb 22(156). doi: 10.3791/60674.

DOI:10.3791/60674
PMID:32150158
Abstract

Animal welfare assessment techniques try to take into consideration the specific needs and wants of the animal in question. Providing enrichment (the addition of physical objects or conspecifics in the housing environment) is often a way to give captive animals the opportunity to choose who or what they interact with and how they spend their time. A fundamental component of the aquatic environment that is often overlooked in captivity, however, is the ability for the animal to choose to engage in physical exercise. For many animals, including fish, exercise is an important aspect of their life history, and is known to have many health benefits, including positive changes in the brain and behavior. Here we present a method for assessing habitat preferences in captive animals. The protocol could easily be adapted to look at a variety of environmental factors (e.g., gravel versus sand as a substrate, plastic plants versus live plants, low flow versus high flow of water) in different aquatic species, or for use with terrestrial species. Statistical assessment of preference is carried out using Jacob's preference index, which ranks the habitats from -1 (avoidance) to +1 (most preferred). With this information, it can be determined what the animal wants from a welfare perspective, including their preferred location.

摘要

动物福利评估技术试图考虑相关动物的特定需求和偏好。提供环境富集(在饲养环境中添加实物或同种动物)通常是一种让圈养动物有机会选择与谁互动、与什么互动以及如何打发时间的方式。然而,在圈养环境中,水生环境的一个经常被忽视的基本要素是动物选择进行体育锻炼的能力。对于许多动物,包括鱼类来说,锻炼是它们生活史的一个重要方面,并且已知有许多健康益处,包括大脑和行为方面的积极变化。在此,我们提出一种评估圈养动物栖息地偏好的方法。该方案可以很容易地适用于研究不同水生物种的各种环境因素(例如,作为基质的砾石与沙子、塑料植物与活植物、低水流与高水流),或用于陆生物种。使用雅各布偏好指数对偏好进行统计评估,该指数将栖息地从 -1(回避)到 +1(最偏好)进行排序。有了这些信息,就可以从福利角度确定动物想要什么,包括它们喜欢的位置。

相似文献

1
A Standardized Protocol for Preference Testing to Assess Fish Welfare.一种用于评估鱼类福利的偏好测试标准化方案。
J Vis Exp. 2020 Feb 22(156). doi: 10.3791/60674.
2
Behavioral Management Programs to Promote Laboratory Animal Welfare促进实验动物福利的行为管理计划
3
How to improve housing conditions of laboratory animals: the possibilities of environmental refinement.如何改善实验动物的住房条件:环境精细化的可能性。
Vet J. 2013 Jan;195(1):24-32. doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2012.09.023. Epub 2012 Nov 3.
4
A history-based method to estimate animal preference.一种基于历史记录来估计动物偏好的方法。
Sci Rep. 2016 Jun 28;6:28328. doi: 10.1038/srep28328.
5
Defining, assessing and promoting the welfare of farmed fish.定义、评估和促进养殖鱼类的福利。
Rev Sci Tech. 2014 Apr;33(1):233-44. doi: 10.20506/rst.33.1.2286.
6
Elephant Management in North American Zoos: Environmental Enrichment, Feeding, Exercise, and Training.北美动物园的大象管理:环境丰富化、饲养、运动及训练
PLoS One. 2016 Jul 14;11(7):e0152490. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0152490. eCollection 2016.
7
Individuality matters for substrate-size preference in the Nile tilapia juveniles.个性对尼罗罗非鱼幼鱼的底物大小偏好很重要。
J Appl Anim Welf Sci. 2018 Oct-Dec;21(4):316-324. doi: 10.1080/10888705.2017.1423229. Epub 2018 Jan 23.
8
Behavioral ecology of captive species: using behavioral adaptations to assess and enhance welfare of nonhuman zoo animals.圈养物种的行为生态学:利用行为适应性评估和提升非人类动物园动物的福利。
J Appl Anim Welf Sci. 2013;16(4):360-80. doi: 10.1080/10888705.2013.827917.
9
Preference assessments as a tool to evaluate environmental enrichment.偏好评估作为一种评价环境丰容的工具。
Zoo Biol. 2020 Nov;39(6):382-390. doi: 10.1002/zoo.21566. Epub 2020 Aug 19.
10
[Abnormal behaviour with a focus on stereotypies--indicators of suffering and impaired welfare?].[以刻板行为为重点的异常行为——痛苦和福利受损的指标?]
Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr. 2016 Mar-Apr;129(3-4):93-102.

引用本文的文献

1
Text mining and topic modeling insights on fish welfare and antimicrobial use in aquaculture.关于水产养殖中鱼类福利和抗菌药物使用的文本挖掘与主题建模见解
BMC Vet Res. 2025 Mar 31;21(1):225. doi: 10.1186/s12917-025-04544-y.
2
A Global Survey on the Perception of Conservationists Regarding Animal Consciousness.关于动物意识,保护主义者认知的全球调查。
Animals (Basel). 2025 Jan 24;15(3):341. doi: 10.3390/ani15030341.
3
Looking beyond the Shoal: Fish Welfare as an Individual Attribute.超越浅滩:作为个体属性的鱼类福利
Animals (Basel). 2022 Sep 28;12(19):2592. doi: 10.3390/ani12192592.
4
Qualitative Behavioral Assessment in Juvenile Farmed Atlantic Salmon (): Potential for On-Farm Welfare Assessment.养殖大西洋鲑幼鱼的定性行为评估:农场福利评估的潜力
Front Vet Sci. 2021 Sep 7;8:702783. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2021.702783. eCollection 2021.
5
Enrichment for Laboratory Zebrafish-A Review of the Evidence and the Challenges.实验室斑马鱼的富集——证据与挑战综述
Animals (Basel). 2021 Mar 5;11(3):698. doi: 10.3390/ani11030698.