• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医院获得性耐甲氧西林和甲氧西林敏感葡萄球菌感染。

Hospital-acquired infection with methicillin-resistant and methicillin-sensitive staphylococci.

作者信息

Law M R, Gill O N

机构信息

Department of Environmental and Preventive Medicine, Medical College of St Bartholomew's Hospital, London.

出版信息

Epidemiol Infect. 1988 Dec;101(3):623-9. doi: 10.1017/s0950268800029496.

DOI:10.1017/s0950268800029496
PMID:3215291
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2249421/
Abstract

In-patients at a London hospital over one year from whom the south-east England strain of 'epidemic' methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) was isolated were compared with in-patients with strains of methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA). MRSA were virtually entirely hospital-acquired; isolates before 10 days were uncommon and related to recent previous admission. Thereafter first isolates occurred at a fairly constant daily rate of about 1.9 per 1,000 in-patients. Acquisition of MSSA after more than 4 days in hospital occurred at a similar constant rate. Such strains were less likely to be penicillin-sensitive than strains isolated in the first 4 days after admission (11 vs. 22%) and were considered to be hospital-acquired. The single MRSA strain caused 40 infections in a year, about half of all hospital-acquired staphylococcal infections. Patients prescribed anti-staphylococcal antibiotics and patients with indwelling cannulae both had about a ninefold increased risk of acquiring MRSA. There was no reciprocal increase in MSSA infections after control measures had substantially reduced the number of MRSA infections.

摘要

对伦敦一家医院一年内分离出英格兰东南部“流行”的耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)菌株的住院患者与分离出甲氧西林敏感金黄色葡萄球菌(MSSA)菌株的住院患者进行了比较。MRSA几乎完全是医院获得性的;入院10天前分离出的菌株并不常见,且与近期入院有关。此后,首批分离菌株以相当稳定的每日发生率出现,每1000名住院患者中约有1.9例。住院4天以上后获得MSSA的发生率也类似且稳定。与入院后前4天分离出的菌株相比,这些菌株对青霉素敏感的可能性较小(分别为11%和22%),并被认为是医院获得性的。单一的MRSA菌株在一年内导致了40起感染,约占所有医院获得性葡萄球菌感染的一半。使用抗葡萄球菌抗生素的患者和留置套管的患者获得MRSA的风险均增加了约9倍。在控制措施大幅减少MRSA感染数量后,MSSA感染并未相应增加。

相似文献

1
Hospital-acquired infection with methicillin-resistant and methicillin-sensitive staphylococci.医院获得性耐甲氧西林和甲氧西林敏感葡萄球菌感染。
Epidemiol Infect. 1988 Dec;101(3):623-9. doi: 10.1017/s0950268800029496.
2
Risk factors for methicillin resistant and sensitive Staphylococcus aureus infection in a Brazilian university hospital.巴西一家大学医院耐甲氧西林和甲氧西林敏感金黄色葡萄球菌感染的危险因素
Braz J Infect Dis. 2000 Jun;4(3):135-43.
3
Antibiotic susceptibility and genomic variations in Staphylococcus aureus associated with Skin and Soft Tissue Infection (SSTI) disease groups.与皮肤和软组织感染(SSTI)疾病组相关的金黄色葡萄球菌的抗生素敏感性和基因组变异
BMC Infect Dis. 2016 Jun 10;16:276. doi: 10.1186/s12879-016-1630-z.
4
[Investigation of SCCmec types and Panton-Valentine leukocidin in community-acquired and nosocomial Staphylococcus aureus strains: comparing skin and soft tissue infections to the other infections].社区获得性和医院获得性金黄色葡萄球菌菌株中葡萄球菌染色体盒式甲氧西林耐药基因(SCCmec)类型及杀白细胞素的研究:皮肤和软组织感染与其他感染的比较
Mikrobiyol Bul. 2012 Jul;46(3):341-51.
5
[Rapid and reliable detection of multiresistent Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) by multiplex PCR].[通过多重聚合酶链反应快速可靠地检测多重耐药金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)]
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2000 May 19;125(20):613-8. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1024385.
6
Plasmid profiles and restriction enzyme fragmentation patterns of plasmids of methicillin-sensitive and methicillin-resistant isolates of Staphylococcus aureus from hospital and the community.来自医院和社区的金黄色葡萄球菌甲氧西林敏感和耐甲氧西林分离株的质粒图谱及质粒的限制性内切酶片段模式。
J Med Microbiol. 1988 Dec;27(4):271-6. doi: 10.1099/00222615-27-4-271.
7
Next-Generation Sequence Analysis Reveals Transfer of Methicillin Resistance to a Methicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus Strain That Subsequently Caused a Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Outbreak: a Descriptive Study.下一代测序分析揭示了耐甲氧西林特性转移至一株甲氧西林敏感金黄色葡萄球菌,该菌株随后引发了耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌暴发:一项描述性研究。
J Clin Microbiol. 2017 Sep;55(9):2808-2816. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00459-17. Epub 2017 Jul 5.
8
[Clinical features and molecular characteristics of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in children].儿童耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌的临床特征及分子特性
Zhonghua Er Ke Za Zhi. 2013 Jul;51(7):512-7.
9
[Nosocomial infection with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus].耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌医院感染
Rinsho Byori. 1990 Sep;38(9):990-7.
10
[Infectivity-resistotype-genotype clustering of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains in the Central Blacksea Region of Turkey].[土耳其黑海中部地区耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌菌株的感染性-抗血清型-基因型聚类分析]
Mikrobiyol Bul. 2014 Jan;48(1):14-27.

引用本文的文献

1
Evolving Patterns of Etiological Profiles and Susceptibility Trends of Healthcare-Associated Infections Since Inception: A Meta-Analysis.自起始以来医疗保健相关感染的病因学特征演变模式及易感性趋势:一项荟萃分析
Cureus. 2025 Sep 14;17(9):e92260. doi: 10.7759/cureus.92260. eCollection 2025 Sep.
2
Is methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus replacing methicillin-susceptible S. aureus?耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌正在取代甲氧西林敏感金黄色葡萄球菌吗?
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2011 Oct;66(10):2199-214. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkr278. Epub 2011 Jul 7.
3
Staphylococcus aureus antimicrobial susceptibility of abscess samples from adults and children from the Kaleida Health System in western New York State, 2003 to 2006.2003 年至 2006 年,美国纽约州西部凯莱德健康系统成人和儿童脓肿样本中金黄色葡萄球菌的抗菌药敏性。
J Clin Microbiol. 2010 May;48(5):1753-7. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01065-08. Epub 2010 Feb 24.
4
A randomized controlled trial of tea tree oil (5%) body wash versus standard body wash to prevent colonization with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in critically ill adults: research protocol.一项关于茶树油(5%)沐浴露与标准沐浴露预防重症成年患者耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)定植的随机对照试验:研究方案。
BMC Infect Dis. 2008 Nov 28;8:161. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-8-161.
5
The management of infection and colonization due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: A CIDS/CAMM position paper.耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌感染与定植的管理:一份加拿大感染病学会/加拿大抗菌药物管理协会立场文件
Can J Infect Dis. 2004 Jan;15(1):39-48. doi: 10.1155/2004/531434.
6
Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a general intensive care unit.综合重症监护病房中的耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌
J R Soc Med. 2004 Nov;97(11):521-6. doi: 10.1177/014107680409701103.
7
Staphylococcus aureus nasal carriage as a marker for subsequent staphylococcal infections in intensive care unit patients.金黄色葡萄球菌鼻腔携带作为重症监护病房患者后续葡萄球菌感染的一个标志物。
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1997 May;16(5):351-7. doi: 10.1007/BF01726362.

本文引用的文献

1
Epidemiology of nosocomial infections caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌引起的医院感染流行病学
Ann Intern Med. 1982 Sep;97(3):309-17. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-97-3-309.
2
Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: experience in a general hospital over four years.耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌:一家综合医院四年的经验
Am J Epidemiol. 1982 Jun;115(6):941-50. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a113381.
3
Epidemiologic studies of an outbreak of nosocomial methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections.医院内耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌感染暴发的流行病学研究
Infect Control. 1981 Mar-Apr;2(2):110-6. doi: 10.1017/s0195941700053881.
4
Impact of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus on the incidence of nosocomial staphylococcal infections.耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌对医院内葡萄球菌感染发病率的影响。
J Infect Dis. 1983 Oct;148(4):763. doi: 10.1093/infdis/148.4.763.
5
Staying one jump ahead of resistant Staphylococcus aureus.领先抗药性金黄色葡萄球菌一步。
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1986 Sep 6;293(6547):573-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.293.6547.573.
6
Epidemiology and control of the 'modern' methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.“现代”耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌的流行病学与控制
J Hosp Infect. 1986 Mar;7 Suppl A:1-11. doi: 10.1016/0195-6701(86)90002-2.
7
Workshop on methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus held at the headquarters of the Public Health Laboratory Service on 8 January 1985.
J Hosp Infect. 1985 Sep;6(3):342-8.
8
An outbreak of infections caused by strains of Staphylococcus aureus resistant to methicillin and aminoglycosides. II. Epidemiologic studies.由对甲氧西林和氨基糖苷类耐药的金黄色葡萄球菌菌株引起的感染暴发。II. 流行病学研究。
J Infect Dis. 1979 Mar;139(3):280-7. doi: 10.1093/infdis/139.3.280.