Department of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2011 Oct;66(10):2199-214. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkr278. Epub 2011 Jul 7.
Despite extensive research on the emergence of and treatments for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), prior studies have not rigorously evaluated the impact of methicillin resistance on the overall incidence of S. aureus infections. Yet, there are direct clinical and research implications of determining whether methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) infection rates remain stable in the face of increasing MRSA prevalence or whether MSSA will be replaced over time. A synthesis of prior studies indicates that the emergence of healthcare-associated MRSA (HA-MRSA) and community-associated MRSA (CA-MRSA) has led to an increase in the overall incidence of S. aureus infections, with MRSA principally adding to, rather than replacing, MSSA. However, colonization with CA-MRSA may at least partially replace colonization with MSSA. So far, evidence indicates that MSSA still accounts for many infections. Therefore, eradication of MRSA alone is not sufficient to address the public health burden of S. aureus.
尽管已经对耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)的出现和治疗方法进行了广泛的研究,但之前的研究并没有严格评估耐甲氧西林对金黄色葡萄球菌感染总发生率的影响。然而,确定在 MRSA 流行率增加的情况下,甲氧西林敏感金黄色葡萄球菌(MSSA)感染率是否保持稳定,或者 MSSA 是否会随着时间的推移而被取代,这具有直接的临床和研究意义。对先前研究的综合分析表明,医疗保健相关耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(HA-MRSA)和社区相关耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(CA-MRSA)的出现导致金黄色葡萄球菌感染总发生率的增加,MRSA 主要是增加了 MSSA 的感染,而不是取代了 MSSA。然而,CA-MRSA 的定植至少可能部分取代 MSSA 的定植。到目前为止,有证据表明 MSSA 仍然是许多感染的原因。因此,单独消除 MRSA 不足以解决金黄色葡萄球菌对公共卫生的负担。