Dysvik Anna, La Rosa Sabina Leanti, Liland Kristian Hovde, Myhrer Kristine S, Østlie Hilde Marit, De Rouck Gert, Rukke Elling-Olav, Westereng Bjørge, Wicklund Trude
Faculty of Chemistry, Biotechnology and Food Science, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Ås, Norway.
Faculty of Science and Technology, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Ås, Norway.
Front Microbiol. 2020 Feb 21;11:279. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.00279. eCollection 2020.
Increasing popularity of sour beer urges the development of novel solutions for controlled fermentations both for fast acidification and consistency in product flavor and quality. One possible approach is the use of in co-fermentation with species, which produce lactic acid as a major end-product of carbohydrate catabolism. The ability of lactobacilli to ferment beer is determined by their capacity to sustain brewing-related stresses, including hop iso-α acids, low pH and ethanol. Here, we evaluated the tolerance of BSO464 and CD034 to beer conditions and different fermentation strategies as well as their use in the brewing process in mixed fermentation with a brewer's yeast, US-05. Results were compared with those obtained with a commercial (WildBrew Sour Pitch), a strain commonly used for kettle souring. In pure cultures, the three strains showed varying susceptibility to stresses, with being the most resistant and displaying the lowest stress tolerance. When in co-fermentation with , both and were able to generate sour beer in as little as 21 days, and their presence positively influenced the composition of flavor-active compounds. Both sour beers were sensorially different from each other and from a reference beer fermented by alone. While the beer produced with had an increased intensity in fruity odor and dried fruit odor, the beer had a higher total flavor intensity, acidic taste and astringency. Remarkably, the beer generated with was perceived as comparable to a commercial sour beer in multiple sensory attributes. Taken together, this study demonstrates the feasibility of using BSO464 and in co-fermentation with for controlled sour beer production with shortened production time.
酸啤酒越来越受欢迎,这促使人们开发新的解决方案来进行可控发酵,以实现快速酸化并确保产品风味和质量的一致性。一种可能的方法是将[具体乳酸菌名称]与[具体酵母名称]共同发酵,[具体乳酸菌名称]会产生乳酸作为碳水化合物分解代谢的主要终产物。乳酸菌发酵啤酒的能力取决于它们承受酿造相关压力的能力,包括啤酒花异α酸、低pH值和乙醇。在此,我们评估了[乳酸菌名称1] BSO464和[乳酸菌名称2] CD034对啤酒条件和不同发酵策略的耐受性,以及它们与酿酒酵母US-05在混合发酵酿造过程中的应用。将结果与使用商业[具体乳酸菌名称](WildBrew Sour Pitch)获得的结果进行比较,WildBrew Sour Pitch是一种常用于罐内酸化的菌株。在纯培养中,这三种菌株对压力的敏感性各不相同,[乳酸菌名称1]最具抗性,[乳酸菌名称2]的压力耐受性最低。当与[酿酒酵母名称]共同发酵时,[乳酸菌名称1]和[乳酸菌名称2]都能够在短短21天内酿造出酸啤酒,并且它们的存在对风味活性化合物的组成产生了积极影响。两种酸啤酒在感官上彼此不同,也与仅由[酿酒酵母名称]发酵的参考啤酒不同。虽然用[乳酸菌名称1]酿造的啤酒果香味和果脯味强度增加,但用[乳酸菌名称2]酿造的啤酒总风味强度、酸味和涩味更高。值得注意的是,用[乳酸菌名称2]酿造的啤酒在多个感官属性上被认为与商业酸啤酒相当。综上所述,本研究证明了将[乳酸菌名称1] BSO464和[乳酸菌名称2]与[酿酒酵母名称]共同发酵用于可控酸啤酒生产并缩短生产时间具有可行性。