Office of Global Health, Department of Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Boulevard, Dallas, TX, 75390, United States of America.
Department of Community Health & Primary Health Care, Lagos State University Teaching Hospital, 1-5, Oba Akinjobi Road, Ikeja, Lagos, Nigeria.
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2021 Oct;47(5):1591-1598. doi: 10.1007/s00068-020-01319-y. Epub 2020 Mar 10.
The mortality rate from road traffic accidents (RTAs) in Nigeria is almost double that of the USA. In Nigeria, the first emergency medical services (EMS) system was established in March 2001, The Lagos State Ambulance Service (LASAMBUS). The objectives of this study are to (1) determine the burden of RTAs in Lagos, (2) assess RTA call outcomes, and (3) analyze LASAMBUS's response time and causes for delay.
We reviewed completed LASAMBUS intervention forms spanning December 2017 to May 2018. We categorized the call outcomes into five groups: I. Addressed Crash, II. No Crash (False Call), III. Crash Already Addressed, IV. Did Not Respond, and V. Other. We further explored associations between the (1) causes for delay and outcomes and (2) response times and the outcomes.
Overall, we analyzed 1352 intervention forms. We found that LASAMBUS did not address 53% of the RTA calls that they received. Of this, Outcome II. No Crash (False Call) accounted for 26% and Outcome III. Crash Already Addressed accounted for 22%. Self-reported causes for delay were recorded in 180 forms, representing 13.7% of the RTA burden. Traffic congestion accounted for 60% of this distribution.
LASAMBUS response rates are significantly lower than response rates in high-income countries such as the USA and lead to increased RTA mortality rates. Eliminating causes for delay will improve both LASAMBUS effectiveness and RTA victims' health outcomes. Changing the public perception of LASAMBUS and standardizing LASAMBUS' contact information will aid this as well.
尼日利亚道路交通伤害(RTA)的死亡率几乎是美国的两倍。尼日利亚于 2001 年 3 月建立了第一个紧急医疗服务(EMS)系统,即拉各斯州救护车服务(LASAMBUS)。本研究的目的是:(1)确定拉各斯 RTA 的负担;(2)评估 RTA 呼叫结果;(3)分析 LASAMBUS 的响应时间和延迟原因。
我们回顾了 2017 年 12 月至 2018 年 5 月期间完成的 LASAMBUS 干预表格。我们将呼叫结果分为五类:I. 处理事故,II. 无事故(误报),III. 事故已处理,IV. 未响应,和 V. 其他。我们进一步探讨了(1)延迟原因与结果,以及(2)响应时间与结果之间的关联。
总体而言,我们分析了 1352 份干预表格。我们发现,LASAMBUS 未处理他们收到的 53%的 RTA 呼叫。其中,结果 II. 无事故(误报)占 26%,结果 III. 事故已处理占 22%。在 180 份表格中记录了自我报告的延迟原因,占 RTA 负担的 13.7%。交通拥堵占这一分布的 60%。
LASAMBUS 的响应率明显低于美国等高收入国家的响应率,导致 RTA 死亡率上升。消除延迟原因将提高 LASAMBUS 的有效性和 RTA 受害者的健康结果。改变公众对 LASAMBUS 的看法和规范 LASAMBUS 的联系方式也将有助于这一点。