Bindler Richard
Department of Ecology and Environmental Science Umeå University Umeå Sweden.
Geohealth. 2018 May 31;2(5):155-161. doi: 10.1002/2018GH000135. eCollection 2018 May.
Over the past four decades numerous studies of lake sediment, marine sediment, and peat from sites in close proximity to mining or metallurgical centers and in remote locations have detailed local and regional histories of lead (Pb) pollution in Europe. Contrary to More et al.'s (2017, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GH000064) claim that "previous assumptions about preindustrial "natural" background lead levels in the atmosphere have been misleading," these studies have clearly shown that true natural background conditions occurred more than 2,500 or even 3,500 years ago, and Pb pollution has proceeded uninterrupted since. The implications of this have been discussed within the context of environmental policy, for example, European Water Framework Directive. Though these records reflect a common European narrative of mining, metallurgy, and pollution, each reflects a combination of local and regional events, leading to differences in the timing and intensity of changes in each Pb record. No one record-ice or otherwise-fully represents the three millennia Pb pollution history in Europe. While the resolution of the ice record is impressive, there are questions about its interpretation. First, the authors discount local and regional Pb sources, whereas there is a close connection between the mining history in an area 40 km from the glacier and changes in a nearby lake Pb record; second, significant changes in ice chemistry cooccurring with the lowest Pb values are overlooked. A sharp increase in Ca/Fe ratios occurs precisely with the steepest Pb declines during the Black Death and mid-1400s, suggesting additional processes influencing the Pb record.
在过去的四十年里,针对来自靠近采矿或冶金中心的地点以及偏远地区的湖泊沉积物、海洋沉积物和泥炭进行了大量研究,详细阐述了欧洲铅(Pb)污染的地方和区域历史。与莫尔等人(2017年,https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GH000064)声称的“先前关于工业化前大气中‘自然’背景铅水平的假设具有误导性”相反,这些研究清楚地表明,真正的自然背景状况出现在2500多年甚至3500多年前,并且自那时以来铅污染一直在持续。这一情况的影响已在环境政策背景下进行了讨论,例如欧洲水框架指令。尽管这些记录反映了欧洲关于采矿、冶金和污染的共同情况,但每一项记录都反映了地方和区域事件的综合影响,导致每条铅记录在变化的时间和强度上存在差异。没有任何一项记录——冰芯记录或其他记录——能完全代表欧洲三千年的铅污染历史。虽然冰芯记录的分辨率令人印象深刻,但对其解读仍存在疑问。首先,作者忽略了地方和区域铅源,然而在距离冰川40公里的一个地区的采矿历史与附近湖泊铅记录的变化之间存在密切联系;其次,与最低铅值同时出现的冰化学显著变化被忽视了。在黑死病和15世纪中叶期间,钙/铁比值急剧增加恰好与铅含量的急剧下降同时发生,这表明还有其他过程影响着铅记录。