Fayet Françoise, Fan Angélique, Rodere Malory, Savel Carine, Pereira Bruno, Soubrier Martin
Rheumatology Department, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Biostatistics Unit, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2020 Feb 24;14:363-369. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S240179. eCollection 2020.
Poor patient adherence to anti-TNF treatment has proven to be a major roadblock to effective management. Therapeutic patient education (TPE) is now recognized as a crucial tool in managing conditions like chronic inflammatory rheumatism and in improving treatment adherence. This study aimed to assess whether different TPE programs might improve adherence to subcutaneous anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) treatment in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), ankylosing spondyloarthritis (AS), and psoriatic arthritis (PsA).
This was a retrospective, observational, monocentric study of current care practices. We included 193 patients (124 women; mean age 53.3 ± 14.8 years). All patients received subcutaneous anti-TNF treatment and one of three TPE models, delivered by a nurse, from 2009 to 2013. The cohort was grouped according to different educational models: M1: information (N=92); M2: individual TPE (N=80); and M3: individual and group TPE sessions (N=21). Adherence was assessed with the Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (MMAS-4™). Scores were rated as follows: good adherence (MMAS-4 = 4), moderate adherence (MMAS-4 = 2-3), and poor adherence (MMAS-4 = 0-1).
The mean disease duration was 10 years [95% CI: 5 to 18]. The cohort comprised 113 patients with RA, 73 with AS, and seven with PsA. Overall, 146 (75.7%) patients displayed good adherence, 34 (17.6%) displayed moderate adherence, and 13 (6.7%) displayed poor adherence. The M3 group displayed less adherence than the M1 and M2 groups. Old age was the only factor correlated with good adherence (p=0.005). The level of knowledge had no significant impact on adherence.
This study demonstrated good adherence to anti-TNF treatment in patients that received TPE, particularly when it was delivered in individual sessions.
事实证明,患者对抗肿瘤坏死因子(anti-TNF)治疗的依从性差是有效治疗的主要障碍。治疗性患者教育(TPE)现已被视为管理慢性炎症性风湿病等病症以及提高治疗依从性的关键工具。本研究旨在评估不同的TPE方案是否可能提高类风湿性关节炎(RA)、强直性脊柱炎(AS)和银屑病关节炎(PsA)患者对皮下注射抗肿瘤坏死因子(anti-TNF)治疗的依从性。
这是一项关于当前护理实践的回顾性、观察性、单中心研究。我们纳入了193例患者(124例女性;平均年龄53.3±14.8岁)。从2009年到2013年,所有患者均接受皮下注射anti-TNF治疗,并接受由护士提供的三种TPE模式之一。该队列根据不同的教育模式进行分组:M1:信息提供组(N = 92);M2:个体TPE组(N = 80);M3:个体和小组TPE课程组(N = 21)。使用Morisky药物依从性量表(MMAS-4™)评估依从性。评分如下:依从性良好(MMAS-4 = 4)、中度依从(MMAS-4 = 2 - 3)和依从性差(MMAS-4 = 0 - 1)。
平均病程为10年[95%可信区间:5至18年]。该队列包括113例RA患者、73例AS患者和7例PsA患者。总体而言,146例(75.7%)患者依从性良好,34例(17.6%)患者中度依从,13例(6.7%)患者依从性差。M3组的依从性低于M1组和M2组。年龄较大是与依从性良好相关的唯一因素(p = 0.005)。知识水平对依从性没有显著影响。
本研究表明接受TPE的患者对抗TNF治疗的依从性良好,尤其是在个体课程中提供TPE时。