• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

驯化对肠道微生物群的影响:野生印度野牛和家养米什米牛的比较研究。

Consequences of Domestication on Gut Microbiome: A Comparative Study Between Wild Gaur and Domestic Mithun.

作者信息

Prabhu Vandana R, Kamalakkannan Ranganathan, Arjun Moolamkudy Suresh, Nagarajan Muniyandi

机构信息

Department of Genomic Science, School of Biological Sciences, Central University of Kerala, Kasaragod, India.

Institute for Infectious Diseases, Faculty of Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.

出版信息

Front Microbiol. 2020 Feb 25;11:133. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.00133. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.3389/fmicb.2020.00133
PMID:32158434
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7051944/
Abstract

Although the gut microbiome benefits the host in several ways, how anthropogenic forces impact the gut microbiome of mammals is not yet completely known. Recent studies have noted reduced gut microbiome diversity in captive mammals due to changes in diet and living environment. However, no studies have been carried out to understand how the gut microbiome of wild mammals responds to domestication. We analyzed the gut microbiome of wild and captive gaur and domestic mithun (domestic form of gaur) to understand whether the gut microbiome exhibits sequential changes from wild to captivity and after domestication. Both captive and domestic populations were characterized by reduced microbial diversity and abundance as compared to their wild counterparts. Notably, two beneficial bacterial families, and , which are known to play vital roles in herbivores' digestion, exhibited lower abundance in captive and domestic populations. Consequently, the predicted bacterial functional pathways especially related to metabolism and immune system showed lower abundance in captive and domestic populations compared to wild population. Therefore, we suggest that domestication can impact the gut microbiome more severely than captivity, which might lead to adverse effects on host health and fitness. However, further investigations are required across a wide range of domesticates in order to understand the general trend of microbiome shifts in domestic animals.

摘要

尽管肠道微生物群在多个方面对宿主有益,但人为因素如何影响哺乳动物的肠道微生物群尚未完全清楚。最近的研究指出,由于饮食和生活环境的变化,圈养哺乳动物的肠道微生物群多样性降低。然而,尚未开展任何研究来了解野生哺乳动物的肠道微生物群如何应对驯化。我们分析了野生白肢野牛和圈养白肢野牛以及驯化野牛(白肢野牛的家养形式)的肠道微生物群,以了解肠道微生物群是否呈现从野生到圈养再到驯化后的连续变化。与野生种群相比,圈养和家养种群的微生物多样性和丰度均降低。值得注意的是,已知在食草动物消化过程中发挥重要作用的两个有益细菌家族,即[此处原文缺失两个细菌家族名称],在圈养和家养种群中的丰度较低。因此,与野生种群相比,圈养和家养种群中预测的细菌功能途径,尤其是与代谢和免疫系统相关的途径,丰度较低。所以,我们认为驯化对肠道微生物群的影响可能比圈养更严重,这可能会对宿主健康和适应性产生不利影响。然而,需要对广泛的家养动物进行进一步研究,以了解家畜微生物群变化的总体趋势。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/baa8/7051944/80da3b47eb7e/fmicb-11-00133-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/baa8/7051944/c137b651450e/fmicb-11-00133-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/baa8/7051944/8bb85b0bbb9f/fmicb-11-00133-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/baa8/7051944/f009cb610215/fmicb-11-00133-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/baa8/7051944/c9f2a17d7a48/fmicb-11-00133-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/baa8/7051944/12ba75a68d16/fmicb-11-00133-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/baa8/7051944/63f05b297b21/fmicb-11-00133-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/baa8/7051944/615389007dee/fmicb-11-00133-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/baa8/7051944/80da3b47eb7e/fmicb-11-00133-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/baa8/7051944/c137b651450e/fmicb-11-00133-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/baa8/7051944/8bb85b0bbb9f/fmicb-11-00133-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/baa8/7051944/f009cb610215/fmicb-11-00133-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/baa8/7051944/c9f2a17d7a48/fmicb-11-00133-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/baa8/7051944/12ba75a68d16/fmicb-11-00133-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/baa8/7051944/63f05b297b21/fmicb-11-00133-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/baa8/7051944/615389007dee/fmicb-11-00133-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/baa8/7051944/80da3b47eb7e/fmicb-11-00133-g008.jpg

相似文献

1
Consequences of Domestication on Gut Microbiome: A Comparative Study Between Wild Gaur and Domestic Mithun.驯化对肠道微生物群的影响:野生印度野牛和家养米什米牛的比较研究。
Front Microbiol. 2020 Feb 25;11:133. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.00133. eCollection 2020.
2
Domestication shapes the pig gut microbiome and immune traits from the scale of lineage to population.家猪的肠道微生物组和免疫特征是从谱系到种群水平上被驯化塑造的。
J Evol Biol. 2023 Dec;36(12):1695-1711. doi: 10.1111/jeb.14227. Epub 2023 Oct 26.
3
The Effects of Captivity on the Mammalian Gut Microbiome.圈养对哺乳动物肠道微生物组的影响。
Integr Comp Biol. 2017 Oct 1;57(4):690-704. doi: 10.1093/icb/icx090.
4
Gut microbiome differences between wild and captive black rhinoceros - implications for rhino health.野生和圈养黑犀牛肠道微生物组的差异 - 对犀牛健康的影响。
Sci Rep. 2019 May 28;9(1):7570. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-43875-3.
5
Comparative Study of Gut Microbiota in Wild and Captive Giant Pandas ().野生和圈养大熊猫肠道微生物的比较研究()。
Genes (Basel). 2019 Oct 20;10(10):827. doi: 10.3390/genes10100827.
6
Gut Microbiomes of Endangered Przewalski's Horse Populations in Short- and Long-Term Captivity: Implication for Species Reintroduction Based on the Soft-Release Strategy.短期和长期圈养的濒危普氏野马种群的肠道微生物群:基于软释放策略对物种重新引入的启示
Front Microbiol. 2020 Mar 12;11:363. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.00363. eCollection 2020.
7
Comparing the gut microbiota of Sichuan golden monkeys across multiple captive and wild settings: roles of anthropogenic activities and host factors.比较多个圈养和野生四川金丝猴的肠道微生物群:人为活动和宿主因素的作用。
BMC Genomics. 2024 Feb 6;25(1):148. doi: 10.1186/s12864-024-10041-7.
8
Gut microbiota of frugo-folivorous sifakas across environments.不同环境下食果-食叶狐猴的肠道微生物群
Anim Microbiome. 2021 May 18;3(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s42523-021-00093-5.
9
The gut microbiome of exudivorous marmosets in the wild and captivity.野生和圈养分泌型食蚁兽的肠道微生物组。
Sci Rep. 2022 Mar 23;12(1):5049. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-08797-7.
10
Complete mitochondrial genome of Indian mithun, Bos frontalis and its phylogenetic implications.印度野牛(Bos frontalis)的线粒体全基因组及其系统发育意义
Mol Biol Rep. 2019 Apr;46(2):2561-2566. doi: 10.1007/s11033-019-04675-0. Epub 2019 Feb 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Adaptive changes in the intestinal microbiota of giant pandas following reintroduction.放归后大熊猫肠道微生物群的适应性变化
Sci Rep. 2025 Aug 23;15(1):31014. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-16136-9.
2
Reintroduction training is instrumental in restoring the oral microbiota of giant pandas from "captivity" to "wildness".再引入训练有助于将大熊猫的口腔微生物群从“圈养”恢复到“野生”状态。
BMC Microbiol. 2025 Jul 2;25(1):391. doi: 10.1186/s12866-025-04084-3.
3
The impact of wild-boar-derived microbiota transplantation on piglet microbiota, metabolite profile, and gut proinflammatory cytokine production differs from sow-derived microbiota.

本文引用的文献

1
Influence of maternal factors on the rumen microbiome and subsequent host performance.母体因素对瘤胃微生物群及后续宿主性能的影响。
Transl Anim Sci. 2018 Sep 27;2(Suppl 1):S101-S105. doi: 10.1093/tas/txy058. eCollection 2018 Sep.
2
Natural diets promote retention of the native gut microbiota in captive rodents.天然饮食可促进圈养啮齿动物保留其本土肠道微生物群。
ISME J. 2020 Jan;14(1):67-78. doi: 10.1038/s41396-019-0497-6. Epub 2019 Sep 9.
3
Host genetics and geography influence microbiome composition in the sponge Ircinia campana.
野猪源微生物群移植对仔猪微生物群、代谢物谱和肠道促炎细胞因子产生的影响不同于母猪源微生物群。
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2025 Mar 19;91(3):e0226524. doi: 10.1128/aem.02265-24. Epub 2025 Feb 4.
4
Distinct fecal microbiome between wild and habitat-housed captive polar bears (Ursus maritimus): Impacts of captivity and dietary shifts.野生和圈养栖息地北极熊(Ursus maritimus)粪便微生物组的明显差异:圈养和饮食变化的影响。
PLoS One. 2024 Nov 20;19(11):e0311518. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0311518. eCollection 2024.
5
A comparison of wild boar and domestic pig microbiota does not reveal a loss of microbial species but an increase in alpha diversity and opportunistic genera in domestic pigs.野猪和家猪的微生物组比较研究并未发现微生物物种的丧失,而是发现家猪的 alpha 多样性和机会性病原体属增加。
Microbiol Spectr. 2024 Oct 3;12(10):e0084324. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.00843-24. Epub 2024 Aug 20.
6
Gut protozoa of wild rodents - a meta-analysis.野生啮齿动物肠道原生动物 - 一项荟萃分析。
Parasitology. 2024 May;151(6):594-605. doi: 10.1017/S0031182024000556. Epub 2024 May 8.
7
Rusa deer microbiota: the importance of preliminary data analysis for meaningful diversity comparisons.水鹿微生物群:有意义的多样性比较中初步数据分析的重要性。
Int Microbiol. 2025 Jan;28(1):37-47. doi: 10.1007/s10123-024-00521-x. Epub 2024 Apr 8.
8
Habitat shapes the gut microbiome diversity of Malayan tigers (Panthera tigris jacksoni) as revealed through metabarcoding 16S rRNA profiling.基于 16S rRNA 高通量测序的宏条形码分析揭示了栖息地塑造了马来亚虎( Panthera tigris jacksoni )的肠道微生物多样性。
World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2024 Feb 28;40(4):111. doi: 10.1007/s11274-023-03868-x.
9
Marked variations in diversity and functions of gut microbiota between wild and domestic stag beetle Dorcus Hopei Hopei.野生和家养冀北兜甲(Dorcus hopei Hopei)肠道微生物菌群的多样性和功能存在明显差异。
BMC Microbiol. 2024 Jan 18;24(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s12866-023-03177-1.
10
The putative maintaining mechanism of gut bacterial ecosystem in giant pandas and its potential application in conservation.大熊猫肠道细菌生态系统的假定维持机制及其在保护中的潜在应用。
Evol Appl. 2022 Dec 30;16(1):36-47. doi: 10.1111/eva.13494. eCollection 2023 Jan.
宿主遗传学和地理学影响着海绵 Ircinia campana 中的微生物群落组成。
J Anim Ecol. 2019 Nov;88(11):1684-1695. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.13065. Epub 2019 Sep 3.
4
Host genetics influence the rumen microbiota and heritable rumen microbial features associate with feed efficiency in cattle.宿主遗传学影响瘤胃微生物群,可遗传的瘤胃微生物特征与牛的饲料效率有关。
Microbiome. 2019 Jun 13;7(1):92. doi: 10.1186/s40168-019-0699-1.
5
Gut microbiome differences between wild and captive black rhinoceros - implications for rhino health.野生和圈养黑犀牛肠道微生物组的差异 - 对犀牛健康的影响。
Sci Rep. 2019 May 28;9(1):7570. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-43875-3.
6
Nutrient-based diet modifications impact on the gut microbiome of the Javan slow loris (Nycticebus javanicus).基于营养的饮食改变对爪哇猕猴(Nycticebus javanicus)肠道微生物组的影响。
Sci Rep. 2019 Mar 11;9(1):4078. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-40911-0.
7
Complete mitochondrial genome of Indian mithun, Bos frontalis and its phylogenetic implications.印度野牛(Bos frontalis)的线粒体全基因组及其系统发育意义
Mol Biol Rep. 2019 Apr;46(2):2561-2566. doi: 10.1007/s11033-019-04675-0. Epub 2019 Feb 14.
8
Effects of Psychological, Environmental and Physical Stressors on the Gut Microbiota.心理、环境和身体应激源对肠道微生物群的影响。
Front Microbiol. 2018 Sep 11;9:2013. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.02013. eCollection 2018.
9
Characterization of bacterial microbiota compositions along the intestinal tract in pigs and their interactions and functions.猪肠道内细菌微生物群落组成及其相互作用和功能的特征。
Sci Rep. 2018 Aug 24;8(1):12727. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-30932-6.
10
High-density Genotyping reveals Genomic Characterization, Population Structure and Genetic Diversity of Indian Mithun (Bos frontalis).高密度基因分型揭示了印度大额牛(Bos frontalis)的基因组特征、群体结构和遗传多样性。
Sci Rep. 2018 Jul 9;8(1):10316. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-28718-x.