Perna Giampaolo, Alciati Alessandra, Daccò Silvia, Grassi Massimiliano, Caldirola Daniela
Humanitas University Department of Biomedical Sciences, Milan, Italy.
Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Villa San Benedetto Menni Hospital, Hermanas Hospitalarias, Como, Italy.
Psychiatry Investig. 2020 Mar;17(3):193-206. doi: 10.30773/pi.2019.0289. Epub 2020 Mar 12.
Despite several pharmacological options, the clinical outcomes of major depressive disorder (MDD) are often unsatisfactory. Personalized psychiatry attempts to tailor therapeutic interventions according to each patient's unique profile and characteristics. This approach can be a crucial strategy in improving pharmacological outcomes in MDD and overcoming trial-and-error treatment choices. In this narrative review, we evaluate whether sociodemographic (i.e., gender, age, race/ethnicity, and socioeconomic status) and clinical [i.e., body mass index (BMI), severity of depressive symptoms, and symptom profiles] variables that are easily assessable in clinical practice may help clinicians to optimize the selection of antidepressant treatment for each patient with MDD at the early stages of the disorder. We found that several variables were associated with poorer outcomes for all antidepressants. However, only preliminary associations were found between some clinical variables (i.e., BMI, anhedonia, and MDD with melancholic/atypical features) and possible benefits with some specific antidepressants. Finally, in clinical practice, the assessment of sociodemographic and clinical variables considered in our review can be valuable for early identification of depressed individuals at high risk for poor responses to antidepressants, but there are not enough data on which to ground any reliable selection of specific antidepressant class or compounds. Recent advances in computational resources, such as machine learning techniques, which are able to integrate multiple potential predictors, such as individual/ clinical variables, biomarkers, and genetic factors, may offer future reliable tools to guide personalized antidepressant choice for each patient with MDD.
尽管有多种药物治疗选择,但重度抑郁症(MDD)的临床治疗效果往往不尽人意。个性化精神病学试图根据每位患者的独特情况和特征来定制治疗干预措施。这种方法可能是改善MDD药物治疗效果以及克服反复试验性治疗选择的关键策略。在这篇叙述性综述中,我们评估在临床实践中易于评估的社会人口统计学变量(即性别、年龄、种族/民族和社会经济地位)和临床变量[即体重指数(BMI)、抑郁症状严重程度和症状特征]是否有助于临床医生在疾病早期为每位MDD患者优化抗抑郁治疗的选择。我们发现,有几个变量与所有抗抑郁药物的较差治疗效果相关。然而,仅在一些临床变量(即BMI、快感缺失以及伴有 melancholic/非典型特征的MDD)与某些特定抗抑郁药物的潜在益处之间发现了初步关联。最后,在临床实践中,我们综述中所考虑的社会人口统计学和临床变量评估对于早期识别对抗抑郁药物反应不佳的高风险抑郁症患者可能是有价值的,但目前尚无足够数据来支持对特定抗抑郁药物类别或化合物进行任何可靠的选择。计算资源的最新进展,如机器学习技术,能够整合多个潜在预测因素,如个体/临床变量、生物标志物和遗传因素,可能会为未来为每位MDD患者指导个性化抗抑郁药物选择提供可靠工具。