Buhrmester D, Furman W, Wittenberg M T, Reis H T
Department of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles 90024.
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1988 Dec;55(6):991-1008. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.55.6.991.
In three studies we investigated the utility of distinguishing among different domains of interpersonal competence in college students' peer relationships. In Study 1 we developed a questionnaire to assess five dimensions of competence: initiating relationships, self-disclosure, asserting displeasure with others' actions, providing emotional support, and managing interpersonal conflicts. Initial validation evidence was gathered. We found that self-perceptions of competence varied as a function of sex of subject, sex of interaction partner, and competence domain. In Study 2 we found moderate levels of agreement between ratings of competence by subjects and their roommates. Interpersonal competence scores were also related in predictable ways to subject and roommate reports of masculinity and femininity, social self-esteem, loneliness, and social desirability. In Study 3 we obtained ratings of subjects' competence from their close friends and new acquaintances. Relationship satisfaction among new acquaintances was predicted best by initiation competence, whereas satisfaction in friendships was most strongly related to emotional support competence. The findings provide strong evidence of the usefulness of distinguishing among domains of interpersonal competence.
在三项研究中,我们调查了区分大学生同伴关系中人际能力不同领域的效用。在研究1中,我们编制了一份问卷来评估能力的五个维度:建立关系、自我表露、对他人行为表达不满、提供情感支持以及处理人际冲突。收集了初步的效度证据。我们发现,能力的自我认知因被试性别、互动伙伴性别和能力领域的不同而有所差异。在研究2中,我们发现被试对自身能力的评分与他们室友的评分之间存在中等程度的一致性。人际能力得分也以可预测的方式与被试及其室友关于男性气质和女性气质、社会自尊、孤独感以及社会赞许性的报告相关。在研究3中,我们从亲密朋友和新认识的人那里获得了对被试能力的评分。新认识的人之间的关系满意度最好由建立关系的能力来预测,而友谊中的满意度与情感支持能力的关联最为紧密。这些发现为区分人际能力领域的有用性提供了有力证据。