• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

运用16种人格因素问卷检验智力假设下的人格差异

Using the 16PF to Test the Differentiation of Personality by Intelligence Hypothesis.

作者信息

Schermer Julie Aitken, Krammer Georg, Goffin Richard D, Biderman Michael D

机构信息

Management and Organizational Studies, Faculty of Social Science, The University of Western Ontario, London, ON N6A 5C2, Canada.

Institute of Practical Education and Practitioner Research, University College of Teacher Education Styria, 8010 Graz, Austria.

出版信息

J Intell. 2020 Mar 10;8(1):12. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence8010012.

DOI:10.3390/jintelligence8010012
PMID:32164191
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7151114/
Abstract

The differentiation of personality by intelligence hypothesis suggests that there will be greater individual differences in personality traits for those individuals who are more intelligent. Conversely, less intelligent individuals will be more similar to each other in their personality traits. The hypothesis was tested with a large sample of managerial job candidates who completed an omnibus personality measure with 16 scales and five intelligence measures (used to generate an intelligence -factor). Based on the -factor composite, the sample was split using the median to conduct factor analyses within each half. A five-factor model was tested for both the lower and higher intelligence halves and were found to have configural invariance but not metric or scalar invariance. In general, the results provide little support for the differentiation hypothesis as there was no clear and consistent pattern of lower inter-scale correlations for the more intelligent individuals.

摘要

智力对人格的分化假说表明,对于那些更聪明的个体而言,其人格特质方面的个体差异会更大。相反,不太聪明的个体在人格特质上会彼此更为相似。该假说通过对大量管理岗位求职者样本进行了检验,这些求职者完成了一项包含16个量表的综合人格测量以及五项智力测量(用于生成一个智力因子)。基于该因子综合得分,利用中位数将样本进行划分,以便在每一半样本内进行因子分析。对智力水平较低和较高的两半样本都测试了一个五因素模型,发现它们具有构型不变性,但不具有度量不变性或标量不变性。总体而言,结果几乎没有为分化假说提供支持,因为对于更聪明的个体,并没有清晰且一致的量表间较低相关性模式。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f16/7151114/b54f004501cd/jintelligence-08-00012-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f16/7151114/b54f004501cd/jintelligence-08-00012-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f16/7151114/b54f004501cd/jintelligence-08-00012-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Using the 16PF to Test the Differentiation of Personality by Intelligence Hypothesis.运用16种人格因素问卷检验智力假设下的人格差异
J Intell. 2020 Mar 10;8(1):12. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence8010012.
2
The 16PF Related to the Five-Factor Model of Personality: Multiple-Indicator Measurement versus the A Priori Scales.与人格五因素模型相关的16种人格因素问卷:多指标测量与先验量表
Multivariate Behav Res. 1991 Apr 1;26(2):271-89. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr2602_5.
3
Personality profiles of police candidates.警察候选人的性格特征。
J Clin Psychol. 1994 Mar;50(2):200-7. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(199403)50:2<200::aid-jclp2270500208>3.0.co;2-1.
4
Personality inventory for DSM-5-Brief Form (PID-5-BF): Measurement invariance across men and women.DSM-5 简明人格量表(PID-5-BF):男性和女性的测量不变性。
Personal Disord. 2023 May;14(3):334-338. doi: 10.1037/per0000569. Epub 2022 Apr 11.
5
Can personality traits and intelligence compensate for background disadvantage? Predicting status attainment in adulthood.人格特质和智力能否弥补背景劣势?预测成年后的地位获得情况。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2015 Sep;109(3):473-89. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000024. Epub 2014 Nov 17.
6
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
7
The relationship of personality traits as measured in the questionnaire medium and by self-ratings.通过问卷方式以及自我评定所测量的人格特质之间的关系。
J Psychol. 1975 Nov;91(2d Half):173-82. doi: 10.1080/00223980.1975.9923939.
8
The HEXACO-100 Across 16 Languages: A Large-Scale Test of Measurement Invariance.HEXACO-100 跨 16 种语言:大规模测量不变性检验。
J Pers Assess. 2020 Sep-Oct;102(5):714-726. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2019.1614011. Epub 2019 Jun 11.
9
How Cognitive Ability Shapes Personality Differentiation in Real Job Candidates: Insights from a Large-Scale Study.认知能力如何塑造实际求职者的个性差异:一项大规模研究的见解
J Intell. 2024 Mar 16;12(3):34. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence12030034.
10
Does the Factor Structure of IQ Differ Between the Differential Ability Scales (DAS-II) Normative Sample and Autistic Children?智商的因素结构在差异能力量表(DAS-II)常模样本和自闭症儿童之间是否存在差异?
Autism Res. 2020 Jul;13(7):1184-1194. doi: 10.1002/aur.2285. Epub 2020 Feb 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Personality Assessment in Groups of Different Verbal Intelligence Levels.不同语言智力水平群体中的人格评估。
Scand J Psychol. 2025 Aug;66(4):473-481. doi: 10.1111/sjop.13099. Epub 2025 Feb 23.
2
How Cognitive Ability Shapes Personality Differentiation in Real Job Candidates: Insights from a Large-Scale Study.认知能力如何塑造实际求职者的个性差异:一项大规模研究的见解
J Intell. 2024 Mar 16;12(3):34. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence12030034.
3
Intelligence, Personality and Tolerance of Ambiguity.智力、个性与对模糊性的容忍度。

本文引用的文献

1
The Practical Effects of Measurement Invariance: Gender Invariance in Two Big Five Personality Measures.测量不变性的实际影响:两种大五人格测量中的性别不变性
Assessment. 2020 Jun;27(4):657-674. doi: 10.1177/1073191119885018. Epub 2019 Nov 5.
2
"THE ABILITIES OF MAN".人类的能力
Science. 1928 Jul 13;68(1750):38. doi: 10.1126/science.68.1750.38-a.
3
Personality factor stability for three ability levels.三种能力水平下的人格因素稳定性。
J Intell. 2023 May 26;11(6):102. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence11060102.
J Psychol. 1963 Apr;55:445-56. doi: 10.1080/00223980.1963.9916639.
4
Does Spearman's g decline at high IQ levels? Some evidence from Scotland.斯皮尔曼的g因素在高智商水平下会下降吗?来自苏格兰的一些证据。
J Genet Psychol. 1992 Jun;153(2):229-30. doi: 10.1080/00221325.1992.10753717.