• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

测量不变性的实际影响:两种大五人格测量中的性别不变性

The Practical Effects of Measurement Invariance: Gender Invariance in Two Big Five Personality Measures.

作者信息

Ock Jisoo, McAbee Samuel T, Mulfinger Evan, Oswald Frederick L

机构信息

Pusan National University, Department of Business Administration, Busan, Republic of Korea.

Bowling Green State University, Department of Psychology, Bowling Green, OH, USA.

出版信息

Assessment. 2020 Jun;27(4):657-674. doi: 10.1177/1073191119885018. Epub 2019 Nov 5.

DOI:10.1177/1073191119885018
PMID:31684745
Abstract

The essence of measurement invariance (MI) analysis is to test the assumption that observed scores on a scale accurately reflect respondents' standings on a measured construct. Based on exploratory structural equation modeling, the current study examines gender-based MI in two Big Five measures of personality: the Mini-IPIP, and the Big Five Inventory (BFI) facet scales. We report results for MI based on both model fit indices and a practical significance index that quantifies the extent of noninvariance (i.e., ). From the latter, we partition the observed group mean differences in scale scores into construct-irrelevant group differences versus construct-relevant group differences. In measures of Agreeableness, Conscientiousness, Extraversion, and Neuroticism across instruments, results supported metric invariance but not scalar invariance. That said, findings of statistical noninvariance were generally small in terms of practical effects, although some notable variability in the effects was evident. Overall, the current results provide evidence regarding gender-based MI of Big Five personality measures that are more detailed than that provided in past work. More generally, this study also provides useful guidance for future researchers investigating both the statistical and practical significance of measurement invariance.

摘要

测量不变性(MI)分析的本质是检验一个假设,即量表上的观测分数准确反映了受访者在被测量结构上的位置。基于探索性结构方程建模,本研究考察了在两种大五人格测量量表(即简版国际人格项目池量表和大五人格量表的分量表)中基于性别的测量不变性。我们报告了基于模型拟合指数和一个量化非不变性程度(即 )的实际意义指数的测量不变性结果。从后者出发,我们将量表分数中观察到的组间均值差异分为与结构无关的组间差异和与结构相关的组间差异。在各量表中关于宜人性、尽责性、外向性和神经质的测量中,结果支持度量不变性,但不支持标量不变性。也就是说,尽管在实际影响方面存在一些明显的变异性,但统计非不变性的结果在实际影响方面通常较小。总体而言,当前结果提供了关于大五人格测量中基于性别的测量不变性的证据,比过去的研究提供的证据更为详细。更一般地说,本研究也为未来研究测量不变性的统计和实际意义的研究者提供了有用的指导。

相似文献

1
The Practical Effects of Measurement Invariance: Gender Invariance in Two Big Five Personality Measures.测量不变性的实际影响:两种大五人格测量中的性别不变性
Assessment. 2020 Jun;27(4):657-674. doi: 10.1177/1073191119885018. Epub 2019 Nov 5.
2
[Validation of the French version of the 10-item Big Five Inventory].[10 项大五人格量表法语版的验证]
Encephale. 2020 Dec;46(6):455-462. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2020.02.006. Epub 2020 Apr 21.
3
Testing the Factor Structure and Measurement Invariance Across Gender of the Big Five Inventory Through Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling.通过探索性结构方程模型检验大五人格量表的因素结构及性别间测量不变性
J Pers Assess. 2016;98(1):88-99. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2015.1035381. Epub 2015 May 1.
4
Measurement Invariance and Sex and Age Differences of the Big Five Inventory-2: Evidence From the Russian Version.大五人格量表 2 的测量不变性和性别与年龄差异:来自俄罗斯语版的证据。
Assessment. 2020 Apr;27(3):472-486. doi: 10.1177/1073191119860901. Epub 2019 Jul 9.
5
[Does the French Big Five Inventory evaluate facets other than the Big Five factors?].[法国大五人格量表是否评估了大五人格因素以外的其他方面?]
Encephale. 2018 Jun;44(3):208-214. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2017.02.004. Epub 2017 Mar 30.
6
Gender-based measurement invariance of the substance use risk profile scale.基于性别的物质使用风险概况量表的测量不变性。
Addict Behav. 2014 Mar;39(3):690-4. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2013.10.016. Epub 2013 Nov 7.
7
Factorial invariance of the Five-Factor Model Rating Form across gender.五因素模型评定量表在不同性别间的因素不变性。
Assessment. 2015 Feb;22(1):65-75. doi: 10.1177/1073191114536772. Epub 2014 Jun 2.
8
Assessment of "los pequeños" Big Five: The Spanish version of the Big Five Personality Trait Short Questionnaire in adolescents.“小大人”大五人格评估:青少年大五人格特质简短问卷的西班牙语版本
Psychol Assess. 2022 May;34(5):e32-e44. doi: 10.1037/pas0001119. Epub 2022 Mar 17.
9
Measurement Invariance of the Five Factor Model of Personality: Facet-Level Analyses Among Euro and Asian Americans.人格五因素模型的测量不变性:欧洲裔和亚裔美国人的层面分析。
Assessment. 2020 Jul;27(5):887-902. doi: 10.1177/1073191119873978. Epub 2019 Sep 19.
10
[Is personality assessment with the French Big Five Inventory (BFI-Fr) invariant according to gender and activity of the respondents?].[使用法国大五人格量表(BFI-Fr)进行的人格评估是否因受访者的性别和活动而具有不变性?]
Encephale. 2022 Feb;48(1):52-59. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2021.02.006. Epub 2021 Apr 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Validation of the Arabic Version of the Maslach Burnout Inventory-HSS Among Tunisian Medical Residents (A-MBI-MR): Factor Structure, Construct Validity, Reliability, and Gender Invariance.突尼斯住院医师版阿拉伯语版马氏职业倦怠量表(A-MBI-MR)的验证:因素结构、结构效度、信度及性别不变性
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Jan 16;13(2):173. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13020173.
2
Review of the psychometric properties of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) Spanish version in a sample of Puerto Rican workers.波多黎各工人样本中患者健康问卷-9(PHQ-9)西班牙语版本的心理测量特性综述。
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Feb 14;14:1024676. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1024676. eCollection 2023.
3
Individual differences in adolescent and young adult daily mobility patterns and their relationships to big five personality traits: a behavioral genetic analysis.
青少年和青年成人日常活动模式的个体差异及其与大五人格特质的关系:一项行为遗传学分析。
J Res Pers. 2022 Oct;100. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2022.104277. Epub 2022 Jul 29.
4
Registered Report: Testing Ideological Asymmetries in Measurement Invariance.注册报告:检验测量不变性中的意识形态不对称性。
Assessment. 2021 Apr;28(3):687-708. doi: 10.1177/1073191120983891. Epub 2021 Jan 29.
5
Using the 16PF to Test the Differentiation of Personality by Intelligence Hypothesis.运用16种人格因素问卷检验智力假设下的人格差异
J Intell. 2020 Mar 10;8(1):12. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence8010012.