Gerbing D W, Tuley M R
Multivariate Behav Res. 1991 Apr 1;26(2):271-89. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr2602_5.
This article examines the Sixteen Personality Factor Inventory (16PF; Cattell, Eber, & Tatsuoka, 1970) in terms of recent methodological and substantive developments: restricted (confirmatory) factor analysis and the five-factor model of personality as operationalized by the NEO-PI (NEO Personality Inventory). A multiple-indicator measurement model of the 16PF was constructed and analyzed with a restricted factor analysis and then cross-validated with a confirmatory analysis on a new sample. The relations of the a priori 16PF scales and the derived scales with the NEO-PI were investigated with comparative canonical correlation analyses. Both the a priori and derived 16PF scales demonstrated strong relationships to the NEO-PI scales, with the canonical correlations for the a priori scales slightly larger. These findings lead to the conclusion that the original 16PF remains robust in the context of these more recent developments.
本文从近期的方法学和实质性进展方面审视了卡特尔十六种人格因素问卷(16PF;Cattell、Eber和Tatsuoka,1970):受限(验证性)因素分析以及由NEO-PI(大五人格问卷)所实施的人格五因素模型。构建了16PF的多指标测量模型,并通过受限因素分析进行分析,然后在新样本上用验证性分析进行交叉验证。通过比较典型相关分析,研究了先验的16PF量表和派生量表与NEO-PI之间的关系。先验的和派生的16PF量表均显示出与NEO-PI量表有很强的关系,先验量表的典型相关系数略大。这些发现得出结论,在这些最新进展的背景下,原始的16PF仍然稳健。