Suppr超能文献

CT 血管造影评估急性前循环大血管闭塞:与临床实践中诊断错误相关的因素。

CT Angiography in Evaluating Large-Vessel Occlusion in Acute Anterior Circulation Ischemic Stroke: Factors Associated with Diagnostic Error in Clinical Practice.

机构信息

From the Department of Radiology, Zuyderland Medical Center, Heerlen/Sittard/Geleen, the Netherlands.

出版信息

AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2020 Apr;41(4):607-611. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A6469. Epub 2020 Mar 12.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

It is currently not completely clear how well radiologists perform in evaluating large-vessel occlusion on CTA in acute ischemic stroke. The purpose of this study was to investigate potential factors associated with diagnostic error.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Five hundred twenty consecutive patients with a clinical diagnosis of acute ischemic stroke (49.4% men; mean age, 72 years) who underwent CTA to evaluate large-vessel occlusion of the proximal anterior circulation were included. CTA scans were retrospectively reviewed by a consensus panel of 2 neuroradiologists. Logistic regression analysis was performed to investigate the association between several variables and missed large-vessel occlusion at the initial CTA interpretation.

RESULTS

The prevalence of large-vessel occlusion was 16% (84/520 patients); 20% (17/84) of large-vessel occlusions were missed at the initial CTA evaluation. In multivariate analysis, non-neuroradiologists were more likely to miss large-vessel occlusion compared with neuroradiologists (OR = 5.62; 95% CI, 1.06-29.85; = .04), and occlusions of the M2 segment were more likely to be missed compared with occlusions of the distal internal carotid artery and/or M1 segment (OR = 5.69; 95% CI, 1.44-22.57; = .01). There were no calcified emboli in initially correctly identified large-vessel occlusions. However, calcified emboli were present in 4 of 17 (24%) initially missed or misinterpreted large-vessel occlusions.

CONCLUSIONS

Several factors may have an association with missing a large-vessel occlusion on CTA, including the CTA interpreter (non-neuroradiologists versus neuroradiologists), large-vessel occlusion location (M2 segment versus the distal internal carotid artery and/or M1 segment), and large-vessel occlusion caused by calcified emboli. Awareness of these factors may improve the accuracy in interpreting CTA and eventually improve stroke outcome.

摘要

背景与目的

目前尚不完全清楚放射科医生在评估急性缺血性卒中 CTA 中的大血管闭塞情况方面的表现如何。本研究旨在探讨与诊断错误相关的潜在因素。

材料与方法

本研究纳入了 520 例经 CTA 评估近端前循环大血管闭塞的急性缺血性卒中患者(49.4%为男性;平均年龄为 72 岁)。由 2 名神经放射科医生对 CTA 扫描进行回顾性复查。采用逻辑回归分析探讨了几个变量与初始 CTA 解读时漏诊大血管闭塞之间的相关性。

结果

大血管闭塞的发生率为 16%(520 例患者中有 84 例);20%(17/84)的大血管闭塞在初始 CTA 评估时漏诊。多变量分析显示,与神经放射科医生相比,非神经放射科医生更有可能漏诊大血管闭塞(OR=5.62;95%CI,1.06-29.85;=0.04),M2 段的闭塞更有可能漏诊,而不是远端颈内动脉和/或 M1 段的闭塞(OR=5.69;95%CI,1.44-22.57;=0.01)。在最初正确识别的大血管闭塞中没有钙化栓子。然而,在最初漏诊或误诊的 17 例大血管闭塞中,有 4 例(24%)存在钙化栓子。

结论

几个因素可能与 CTA 漏诊大血管闭塞有关,包括 CTA 解读者(非神经放射科医生与神经放射科医生)、大血管闭塞位置(M2 段与远端颈内动脉和/或 M1 段)以及由钙化栓子引起的大血管闭塞。了解这些因素可能会提高 CTA 解读的准确性,并最终改善卒中预后。

相似文献

4
Fast Automatic Detection of Large Vessel Occlusions on CT Angiography.快速自动检测 CT 血管造影中的大血管闭塞。
Stroke. 2019 Dec;50(12):3431-3438. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.027076. Epub 2019 Nov 4.
8
Accuracy of smartphone-based evaluation of Emergent Large Vessel Occlusion on CTA.基于智能手机的CTA上急性大血管闭塞评估的准确性
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2018 Aug;171:135-138. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2018.06.012. Epub 2018 Jun 11.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

6
Common pitfalls in statistical analysis: Logistic regression.统计分析中的常见陷阱:逻辑回归
Perspect Clin Res. 2017 Jul-Sep;8(3):148-151. doi: 10.4103/picr.PICR_87_17.
10
Error and discrepancy in radiology: inevitable or avoidable?放射学中的误差与差异:不可避免还是可以避免?
Insights Imaging. 2017 Feb;8(1):171-182. doi: 10.1007/s13244-016-0534-1. Epub 2016 Dec 7.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验