• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
"Keep it short and sweet": Improving risk communication to family physicians during public health crises.“简明扼要”:改善公共卫生危机期间向家庭医生传递风险信息的沟通方式。
Can Fam Physician. 2020 Mar;66(3):e99-e106.
2
Exploring bi-directional and SMS messaging for communications between Public Health Agencies and their stakeholders: a qualitative study.探索公共卫生机构与其利益相关者之间通信的双向和短信消息传递:一项定性研究。
BMC Public Health. 2015 Jul 8;15:621. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-1980-2.
3
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.医院环境中患者与护士以患者为中心的沟通体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072.
4
A Review and Analysis of the Literature on Public Health Emergency Communication Practices.公共卫生应急沟通实践文献综述与分析。
J Community Health. 2022 Feb;47(1):150-162. doi: 10.1007/s10900-021-01032-w. Epub 2021 Sep 13.
5
Exploring the role of teams and technology in patients' medication decision making.探索团队和技术在患者药物决策中的作用。
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2019 Mar-Apr;59(2S):S35-S43.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.japh.2018.12.010. Epub 2019 Feb 5.
6
How should family physicians provide physical activity advice? Qualitative study to inform the design of an e-health intervention.家庭医生应该如何提供身体活动建议?一项定性研究为电子健康干预措施的设计提供信息。
Can Fam Physician. 2019 Sep;65(9):e411-e419.
7
Communication Between Infectious Disease Physicians and US State and Local Public Health Agencies: Strengths, Challenges, and Opportunities.传染病医生与美国州及地方公共卫生机构之间的沟通:优势、挑战与机遇
Public Health Rep. 2016 Sep;131(5):666-670. doi: 10.1177/0033354916660083. Epub 2016 Aug 22.
8
An Exploration of Barriers, Facilitators, and Suggestions for Improving Electronic Health Record Inbox-Related Usability: A Qualitative Analysis.电子健康记录收件箱相关可用性的障碍、促进因素和改进建议的探索:定性分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Oct 2;2(10):e1912638. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.12638.
9
Primary Care Physicians' Experiences With and Strategies for Managing Electronic Messages.初级保健医生处理电子信息的经验及策略。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Dec 2;2(12):e1918287. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.18287.
10
Coordination of cancer care between family physicians and cancer specialists: Importance of communication.家庭医生与癌症专科医生之间的癌症护理协调:沟通的重要性。
Can Fam Physician. 2016 Oct;62(10):e608-e615.

引用本文的文献

1
Strategies to enhance risk communication about medicines in Malaysia: a Delphi study among multinational experts.马来西亚药品风险沟通策略:跨国专家德尔菲研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Sep 3;24(1):1019. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11476-0.
2
Immersive Leadership Training for Physicians: Comparing Retrospective Pre- and Post-Test Virtual vs in-Person 6-Month Follow-Up of Learning.针对医生的沉浸式领导力培训:比较回顾性前后测试中虚拟培训与面对面培训6个月学习随访情况。
J Healthc Leadersh. 2024 Jun 24;16:235-254. doi: 10.2147/JHL.S455105. eCollection 2024.
3
Comparing Virtual vs In-Person Immersive Leadership Training for Physicians.比较针对医生的虚拟沉浸式领导力培训与面对面沉浸式领导力培训
J Healthc Leadersh. 2023 Aug 11;15:139-152. doi: 10.2147/JHL.S411091. eCollection 2023.
4
Analyzing the emotional impact of COVID-19 with Twitter data: Lessons from a B-VAR analysis on Italy.利用推特数据分析新冠疫情的情感影响:来自意大利B-VAR分析的经验教训。
Socioecon Plann Sci. 2023 Jun;87:101610. doi: 10.1016/j.seps.2023.101610. Epub 2023 May 12.
5
Making sense of and working with COVID-19 related guidelines and information in Danish general practice-A qualitative study.丹麦全科医疗中对 COVID-19 相关指导方针和信息的理解与应用:一项定性研究。
PLoS One. 2023 Feb 10;18(2):e0281579. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0281579. eCollection 2023.
6
Enhancing medication risk communication in developing countries: a cross-sectional survey among doctors and pharmacists in Malaysia.提高发展中国家药物风险沟通:在马来西亚医生和药剂师中进行的横断面调查。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Jul 5;22(1):1293. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13703-x.
7
Working conditions in primary healthcare during the COVID-19 pandemic: an interview study with physicians in Sweden.COVID-19 大流行期间初级保健中的工作条件:对瑞典医生的访谈研究。
BMJ Open. 2022 Feb 8;12(2):e055035. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055035.
8
Efficacy of Communication Techniques and Health Outcomes of Bushfire Smoke Exposure: A Scoping Review.沟通技巧对丛林大火烟雾暴露健康结果的影响:范围综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Oct 16;18(20):10889. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182010889.
9
A COVID-19 call center for healthcare providers: dealing with rapidly evolving health policy guidelines.面向医疗服务提供者的 COVID-19 呼叫中心:应对快速演变的卫生政策指南。
Isr J Health Policy Res. 2020 Dec 2;9(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s13584-020-00433-x.

本文引用的文献

1
Perceived needs and experiences with healthcare services of women with spinal cord injury during pregnancy and childbirth - a qualitative content analysis of focus groups and individual interviews.脊髓损伤女性在怀孕和分娩期间对医疗服务的感知需求与经历——焦点小组和个人访谈的定性内容分析
BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Jun 16;15:234. doi: 10.1186/s12913-015-0878-0.
2
The evidence base of primary research in public health emergency preparedness: a scoping review and stakeholder consultation.突发公共卫生事件准备中的基础研究证据:范围综述和利益相关者咨询。
BMC Public Health. 2015 Apr 28;15:432. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-1750-1.
3
How infectious disease outbreaks affect community-based primary care physicians: comparing the SARS and H1N1 epidemics.传染病爆发如何影响社区基层医疗医生:比较非典和甲型H1N1流感疫情
Can Fam Physician. 2014 Oct;60(10):917-25.
4
pH1N1 - a comparative analysis of public health responses in Ontario to the influenza outbreak, public health and primary care: lessons learned and policy suggestions.甲型H1N1流感——安大略省对流感爆发的公共卫生应对措施比较分析,公共卫生与初级保健:经验教训及政策建议
BMC Public Health. 2013 Jul 27;13:687. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-687.
5
Integration of primary health care and public health during a public health emergency.突发公共卫生事件下的基层医疗与公共卫生整合
Am J Public Health. 2012 Nov;102(11):e9-e12. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2012.300957. Epub 2012 Sep 20.
6
Communicating during a pandemic: information the public wants about the disease and new vaccines and drugs.疫情期间的沟通:公众想了解的有关疾病以及新疫苗和药物的信息。
Health Promot Pract. 2011 Jul;12(4):610-9. doi: 10.1177/1524839910363536. Epub 2010 Nov 8.
7
The qualitative content analysis process.定性内容分析过程。
J Adv Nurs. 2008 Apr;62(1):107-15. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x.
8
Choose your method: a comparison of phenomenology, discourse analysis, and grounded theory.选择你的方法:现象学、话语分析和扎根理论的比较。
Qual Health Res. 2007 Dec;17(10):1372-80. doi: 10.1177/1049732307307031.
9
Enhancing public health response to respiratory epidemics: are family physicians ready and willing to help?加强公共卫生对呼吸道传染病的应对:家庭医生是否准备好并愿意提供帮助?
Can Fam Physician. 2006 Oct;52(10):1254-60.
10
How to provide an effective primary health care in fighting against severe acute respiratory syndrome: the experiences of two cities.如何在抗击严重急性呼吸综合征中提供有效的初级卫生保健:两个城市的经验
Am J Infect Control. 2007 Feb;35(1):50-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2006.06.009.

“简明扼要”:改善公共卫生危机期间向家庭医生传递风险信息的沟通方式。

"Keep it short and sweet": Improving risk communication to family physicians during public health crises.

机构信息

Program Manager of the Research and Evaluation Unit at the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Alberta in Edmonton and is Clinical Lecturer in the Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry at the University of Alberta.

Tier 1 Canada Research Chair in Health and Community in the Faculty of Health Sciences at the University of the Fraser Valley in Chilliwack, BC.

出版信息

Can Fam Physician. 2020 Mar;66(3):e99-e106.

PMID:32165480
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8302348/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To identify recommendations from family physicians in Canada on how public health agencies and professional organizations might improve future crisis and emergency risk communications.

DESIGN

Qualitative content analysis.

SETTING

Canada.

PARTICIPANTS

Sixteen family physicians who have experienced a public health crisis.

METHODS

Semistructured interviews were conducted with 16 family physicians practising in various regions across Canada who had experienced what they defined as a public health crisis. These events included environmental crises, like forest fires and hurricanes, and infectious disease crises, like the SARS (severe acute respiratory syndrome) and H1N1 outbreaks. Interview transcripts were coded using an inductive qualitative content analysis method, specifically focusing on recommendations from participants on how to improve risk communication to family physicians in the event of a future public health crisis.

MAIN FINDINGS

Based on their personal experiences, participants had many explicit recommendations on how to improve risk communication strategies in the event of a future public health crisis. These included having a single trusted source of information; having timely and succinct communication; having consideration for learners; ensuring access to information for all physicians; improving public health and family medicine collaboration; having crisis information for patients; and creating communication infrastructure before a crisis occurs.

CONCLUSION

This research provides thoughtful and varied considerations and advice from practising family physicians on how to improve risk communication from public health agencies and professional organizations to this group in the event of a public health crisis. With improved communications between these bodies and family physicians, practitioners will be better informed and prepared to provide the best possible care to their patient populations during such events.

摘要

目的

确定加拿大家庭医生对公共卫生机构和专业组织如何改进未来危机和紧急风险沟通的建议。

设计

定性内容分析。

地点

加拿大。

参与者

16 名有公共卫生危机经验的家庭医生。

方法

对 16 名在加拿大不同地区执业的家庭医生进行了半结构化访谈,他们经历了自己定义的公共卫生危机。这些事件包括环境危机,如森林火灾和飓风,以及传染病危机,如 SARS(严重急性呼吸综合征)和 H1N1 爆发。访谈记录采用归纳式定性内容分析方法进行编码,特别关注参与者关于如何改进未来公共卫生危机中向家庭医生进行风险沟通的建议。

主要发现

根据他们的个人经验,参与者就如何改进未来公共卫生危机中的风险沟通策略提出了许多明确的建议。这些建议包括:有一个单一的可信信息来源;进行及时和简洁的沟通;考虑学习者;确保所有医生都能获得信息;促进公共卫生和家庭医学的合作;为患者提供危机信息;以及在危机发生前建立沟通基础设施。

结论

这项研究从实践家庭医生的角度提供了深思熟虑和多样化的考虑和建议,以改善公共卫生机构和专业组织在发生公共卫生危机时向这一群体传达风险的方式。通过这些机构和家庭医生之间更好的沟通,从业者将更好地了解情况,并在发生此类事件时为其患者群体提供尽可能好的护理。