DiDiodato Giulio
Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence & Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Centre for Education & Research, Royal Victoria Regional Health Centre, Barrie, ON, Canada.
Crit Care Explor. 2019 Oct 14;1(10):e0052. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000052. eCollection 2019 Oct.
To estimate the probability of a substitute decision maker choosing to withdraw life-sustaining therapy after hearing an affirmative patient response to the phrase "Do you want everything done?"
Discrete choice experiment.
Single community hospital in Ontario.
Nonrandom sampling of healthcare providers and the public.
Online survey.
Of the 1,621 subjects who entered the survey, 692 consented and 432 completed the survey. Females comprised 73% of subjects. Over 95% of subjects were under 65 years old, and 50% had some intensive care-related exposure. Healthcare providers comprised 29% of the subjects. The relative importance of attributes for determining the probability of withdraw life-sustaining therapy by substitute decision makers was as follows: stated patient preferences equals to 23.4%; patient age equals to 20.6%; physical function prognosis equals to 15.2%; length of ICU stay equals to 14.4%; survival prognosis equals to 13.8%; and prognosis for communication equals to 12.6%. Using attribute level utilities, the probability of an substitute decision maker choosing to withdraw life-sustaining therapy after hearing a patient answer in the affirmative "Do you want everything done?" compared with "I would not want to live if I could not take care of myself" was 18.8% (95% CI, 17.2-20.4%) versus 59.8% (95% CI, 57.6-62.0%) after controlling for all the other five attribute levels in the scenario: age greater than 80 years; survival prognosis less than 1%; length of ICU stay greater than 6 months; communication equals to unresponsive; and physical equals to bed bound.
Using a discrete choice experiment survey, we estimated the impact of a commonly employed and poorly understood phrase physicians may use when discussing advance care plans with patients and their substitute decision makers on the subsequent withdraw life-sustaining therapies. This phrase is predicted to dramatically reduce the likelihood of withdraw life-sustaining therapy even in medically nonbeneficial scenarios and potentially contribute to low-value end-of-life care and outcomes. The immediate cessation of this term should be reinforced in medical training for all healthcare providers who participate in advance care planning.
评估替代决策者在听到患者对“你希望用尽一切办法吗?”这句话给出肯定回答后选择停止维持生命治疗的概率。
离散选择实验。
安大略省的一家社区医院。
医疗保健提供者和公众的非随机抽样。
在线调查。
在1621名进入调查的受试者中,692人同意参与,432人完成了调查。女性占受试者的73%。超过95%的受试者年龄在65岁以下,50%的人有过与重症监护相关的经历。医疗保健提供者占受试者的29%。对于替代决策者决定停止维持生命治疗概率的属性相对重要性如下:患者明确表达的偏好占23.4%;患者年龄占20.6%;身体功能预后占15.2%;重症监护病房住院时间占14.4%;生存预后占13.8%;沟通预后占12.6%。利用属性水平效用,在控制了情景中所有其他五个属性水平后(年龄大于80岁;生存预后小于1%;重症监护病房住院时间大于6个月;沟通为无反应;身体状况为卧床不起),替代决策者在听到患者肯定回答“你希望用尽一切办法吗?”后选择停止维持生命治疗的概率为18.8%(95%置信区间,17.2 - 20.4%),而听到“如果我不能照顾自己,我就不想活了”后的概率为59.8%(95%置信区间,57.6 - 62.0%)。
通过离散选择实验调查,我们评估了医生在与患者及其替代决策者讨论预先医疗计划时常用但理解不足的一句话对后续停止维持生命治疗的影响。预计这句话会大幅降低即使在医疗上无益处的情况下停止维持生命治疗的可能性,并可能导致低价值的临终护理和结果。对于所有参与预先医疗计划的医疗保健提供者的医学培训中,应加强立即停止使用该表述。