Suppr超能文献

单侧腹横肌平面阻滞与切口浸润:腹腔镜胆囊切除术术后镇痛效果比较。

Unilateral transversus abdominis plane block and port-site infiltration : Comparison of postoperative analgesic efficacy in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, University of Health Science, Dışkapı Yıldırım Beyazıt Training and Research Hospital, Altındağ, Ankara, Turkey.

Department of Anesthesiology, Pain Clinic, University of Health Science, Dışkapı Yıldırım Beyazıt Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.

出版信息

Anaesthesist. 2020 Apr;69(4):270-276. doi: 10.1007/s00101-020-00746-1. Epub 2020 Mar 12.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare the analgesic efficacy of unilateral subcostal transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block with local anesthetic infiltration, applied to the port site in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC).

METHODS

Group T received a unilateral subcostal TAP block, group I received a local anesthetic infiltration at port sites, and group C was the control group. Groups T and I received 20 mL 0.25% bupivacaine. Intravenous patient-controlled analgesia with tramadol was similarly applied to all groups. Postoperative pain levels during rest and cough were evaluated using a numeric rating scale (NRS). Nausea and vomiting were evaluated using postoperative nausea vomiting scores (PONV) at 1, 3, 6, 12 and 24 h and tramadol consumption was also determined. Patient satisfaction was evaluated using a Likert-type scale.

RESULTS

Postoperative resting NRS scores were lower in group T than the other groups at 1 h and 12 h (p = 0.007 and p = 0.016), while NRS values during cough were statistically significant at 1 h (p = 0.004). The 24‑h tramadol consumption was different: group T 229 ± 33 mg, group I 335 ± 95 mg, and group C 358 ± 66 mg (p < 0.001). The percentages of patients reporting that they would prefer the applied postoperative pain control method again were 83.3%, 62.5% and 70.8% in groups T, I and C, respectively (p = 0.118).

CONCLUSION

Unilateral subcostal TAP block was superior to local anesthetic infiltration at port sites after LC, in terms of low opioid consumption. Unilateral subcostal TAP block is recommended as part of a multimodal analgesic protocol.

摘要

目的

比较腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)患者经皮肋缘下腹横肌平面(TAP)阻滞与切口局部浸润麻醉的镇痛效果。

方法

T 组行单侧肋缘下 TAP 阻滞,I 组行切口局部浸润麻醉,C 组为对照组。T 组和 I 组均给予 20ml0.25%布比卡因。三组均采用曲马多静脉自控镇痛。采用数字评分量表(NRS)评估术后静息和咳嗽时的疼痛水平。术后 1、3、6、12 和 24h 采用术后恶心呕吐评分(PONV)评估恶心呕吐情况,并记录曲马多的消耗量。采用李克特量表评估患者满意度。

结果

术后 1h 和 12h,T 组的静息 NRS 评分低于其他两组(p=0.007 和 p=0.016),而咳嗽时的 NRS 值在 1h 时具有统计学意义(p=0.004)。24h 内曲马多的消耗量存在差异:T 组 229±33mg,I 组 335±95mg,C 组 358±66mg(p<0.001)。T、I 和 C 组分别有 83.3%、62.5%和 70.8%的患者表示愿意再次选择所应用的术后止痛控制方法(p=0.118)。

结论

在 LC 术后,与切口局部浸润麻醉相比,经皮肋缘下 TAP 阻滞能减少阿片类药物的消耗,镇痛效果更好。建议将经皮肋缘下 TAP 阻滞作为多模式镇痛方案的一部分。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验