Suppr超能文献

机械通气撤机问题屈指可数:第1部分。

Mechanical ventilation weaning issues can be counted on the fingers of just one hand: part 1.

作者信息

Vetrugno Luigi, Guadagnin Giovanni Maria, Brussa Alessandro, Orso Daniele, Garofalo Eugenio, Bruni Andrea, Longhini Federico, Bove Tiziana

机构信息

Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Clinic, Department of Medicine, University of Udine, Via Colugna 50, 33100, Udine, Italy.

Intensive Care Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University Hospital Mater Domini, Magna Graecia University, Catanzaro, Italy.

出版信息

Ultrasound J. 2020 Mar 13;12(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s13089-020-00161-y.

Abstract

Although mechanical ventilation may be a patient's vital ally during acute illness, it can quickly transform into an enemy during chronic conditions. The weaning process is the fundamental phase that enables the resumption of physiological respiratory function; however, it is also associated with a number of life-threatening complications, and a large percentage of critically ill patients never achieve airway device removal or require the resumption of mechanical ventilation just a few days post-weaning. Indeed, the weaning process is, at present, more of an art than a science. As such, there is urgent need for novel contributions from the scientific literature to abate the growing rates of morbidity and mortality associated with weaning failure. The physician attempting to wean a patient must integrate clinical parameters and common-sense criteria. Numerous studies have striven to identify single predictive factors of weaning failure and sought to standardize the weaning process, but the results are characterized by remarkable heterogeneity. Despite the lack of benchmarks, it is clear that the analysis of respiratory function must include a detailed overview of the five situations described below rather than a single aspect. The purpose of this two-part review is to provide a comprehensive description of these situations to clarify the "arena" physicians are entering when weaning critically ill patients from mechanical ventilation.

摘要

虽然机械通气在急性疾病期间可能是患者至关重要的帮手,但在慢性疾病期间它可能迅速转变为敌人。撤机过程是恢复生理呼吸功能的关键阶段;然而,它也与许多危及生命的并发症相关,并且很大比例的重症患者从未成功撤掉气道装置,或者在撤机后短短几天内就需要恢复机械通气。事实上,目前撤机过程更多的是一门艺术而非科学。因此,迫切需要科学文献提供新的成果,以降低与撤机失败相关的发病率和死亡率不断上升的趋势。试图为患者撤机的医生必须综合临床参数和常识标准。众多研究致力于确定撤机失败的单一预测因素,并试图规范撤机过程,但结果具有显著的异质性。尽管缺乏基准,但很明显,呼吸功能分析必须包括对以下所述五种情况的详细概述,而不是单一的某个方面。这篇分两部分的综述的目的是全面描述这些情况,以阐明医生在为重症患者从机械通气撤机时所进入的“战场”。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/89df/7067937/a859f77100fa/13089_2020_161_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验