• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

专用止血装置联合充分止血方案对桡动脉入路后超声观察桡动脉的影响。

Impact of dedicated hemostasis device for distal radial arterial access with an adequate hemostasis protocol on radial arterial observation by ultrasound.

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Tokai University Hachioji Hospital, 1838 Ishikawa-cho Hachioji, Tokyo, 192-0032, Japan.

Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Tokai University School of Medicine, Isehara, Japan.

出版信息

Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2021 Jan;36(1):104-110. doi: 10.1007/s12928-020-00656-4. Epub 2020 Mar 12.

DOI:10.1007/s12928-020-00656-4
PMID:32166728
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7829236/
Abstract

There is no established hemostasis method or protocol for the transdistal radial approach. Therefore, this study aimed to determine whether "the PreludeSYNC DISTAL" radial compression device (PSD; Merit Medical Systems, Inc., South Jordan, UT) can effectively prevent distal radial artery (dRA) occlusion following catheterization procedures. This retrospective study analyzed patients who underwent hemostasis using the PSD from January 1, 2019, to March 31, 2019. The primary endpoint was occlusion or excessive stenosis of the radial artery (RA) 1 month after catheterization. Pulsatile blood flow and vessel diameters of the dRA and forearm RA (fRA) were measured using vascular ultrasound before and 1 month after catheterization to determine arterial damage. Secondary endpoints were achievement of hemostasis, bleeding, hematoma, aneurysm, neurological abnormality, and functional disturbance of the fingers or hand. Fifty patients (mean age, 70.9 ± 10.7 years; male, 72.0%) were enrolled in this study. Complete hemostasis was achieved in all cases. Total hemostasis time was 161 ± 45 min. No procedure-associated complications were noted. Pulsations of the dRA and fRA were maintained at 1 month. No functional disturbance or neurological abnormality was observed. Vessel diameters of the dRA and fRA were not significantly different before and 1 month after catheterization. No dissection, pseudoaneurysm, or occlusion/stenosis was observed on ultrasound. Distal radial access with a unique device and protocol effectively achieved hemostasis and prevented injury and occlusion of the dRA and fRA.

摘要

对于经远桡动脉入路,目前尚未确立止血方法或方案。因此,本研究旨在确定“PreludeSYNC DISTAL”桡动脉压迫装置(PSD;美国犹他州南约旦市美敦力公司)是否能有效预防经导管操作后远端桡动脉(dRA)闭塞。本回顾性研究分析了 2019 年 1 月 1 日至 2019 年 3 月 31 日使用 PSD 进行止血的患者。主要终点为经导管操作 1 个月后桡动脉(RA)闭塞或过度狭窄。使用血管超声在经导管操作前后 1 个月测量 dRA 和前臂 RA(fRA)的脉动血流和血管直径,以确定动脉损伤情况。次要终点为止血、出血、血肿、动脉瘤、神经功能异常以及手指或手部功能障碍的实现情况。本研究共纳入 50 例患者(平均年龄 70.9±10.7 岁;男性 72.0%)。所有病例均达到完全止血。总的止血时间为 161±45min。无与操作相关的并发症。1 个月时 dRA 和 fRA 的搏动得以维持。未观察到功能障碍或神经功能异常。dRA 和 fRA 的血管直径在经导管操作前后无显著差异。超声未见夹层、假性动脉瘤或闭塞/狭窄。独特的装置和方案经远桡动脉入路可有效止血,并预防 dRA 和 fRA 的损伤和闭塞。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cfcc/7829236/6f1ecbfc681b/12928_2020_656_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cfcc/7829236/7d8aa5957deb/12928_2020_656_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cfcc/7829236/5e20d6935700/12928_2020_656_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cfcc/7829236/6f1ecbfc681b/12928_2020_656_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cfcc/7829236/7d8aa5957deb/12928_2020_656_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cfcc/7829236/5e20d6935700/12928_2020_656_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cfcc/7829236/6f1ecbfc681b/12928_2020_656_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Impact of dedicated hemostasis device for distal radial arterial access with an adequate hemostasis protocol on radial arterial observation by ultrasound.专用止血装置联合充分止血方案对桡动脉入路后超声观察桡动脉的影响。
Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2021 Jan;36(1):104-110. doi: 10.1007/s12928-020-00656-4. Epub 2020 Mar 12.
2
A comparative study of Terumo radial Band® and PreludeSYNC hemostasis compression device after transradial coronary catheterization.经桡动脉冠状动脉介入治疗后使用 Terumo 桡动脉 Band® 和 PreludeSYNC 止血压迫装置的对比研究。
Anatol J Cardiol. 2021 Jun;25(6):402-406. doi: 10.14744/AnatolJCardiol.2020.34694.
3
Distal Versus Conventional Radial Access for Coronary Angiography and Intervention: The DISCO RADIAL Trial.远端桡动脉入路与传统桡动脉入路在冠状动脉造影和介入治疗中的比较:DISCO RADIAL 试验。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Jun 27;15(12):1191-1201. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2022.04.032. Epub 2022 May 17.
4
Radial artery occlusion after conventional and distal radial access: Impact of preserved flow and time-to-hemostasis in a propensity-score matching analysis of 1163 patients.传统桡动脉径路和远端桡动脉径路后桡动脉闭塞:1163 例患者倾向性评分匹配分析中保留血流和止血时间的影响。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Feb;99(3):827-835. doi: 10.1002/ccd.30005. Epub 2021 Nov 16.
5
Prevention of Radial Artery Occlusion After Transradial Catheterization: The PROPHET-II Randomized Trial.经桡动脉入路导管介入术后预防桡动脉闭塞:PROPHET-II 随机试验。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Oct 10;9(19):1992-1999. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.07.020.
6
Distal Radial Artery Access in comparison to Forearm Radial Artery Access for Cardiac Catheterization: A Randomized Controlled Trial (DARFORA Trial).经桡动脉(尺骨茎突附近)途径入路与经前臂桡动脉途径入路行心导管术的对比:一项随机对照试验(DARFORA 试验)。
J Interv Cardiol. 2022 Jul 15;2022:7698583. doi: 10.1155/2022/7698583. eCollection 2022.
7
Accelerated patent hemostasis using a procoagulant disk; a protocol designed to minimize the risk of radial artery occlusion following cardiac catheterization.使用促凝盘加速专利止血;一种旨在将心脏导管插入术后桡动脉闭塞风险降至最低的方案。
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2019 Feb;20(2):137-142. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2018.03.026. Epub 2018 Apr 21.
8
Distal versus conventional radial artery access for coronary catheterization: A systematic review and meta-analysis.冠状动脉造影中远端桡动脉入路与传统桡动脉入路的比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2023 Mar;101(4):722-736. doi: 10.1002/ccd.30602. Epub 2023 Feb 19.
9
Distal Transradial Access For Cardiac Catheterization in Patients Undergoing Hemodialysis.经皮桡动脉远端入路在血液透析患者心导管检查中的应用。
J Invasive Cardiol. 2022 Aug;34(8):E627-E632. doi: 10.25270/jic/21.00386.
10
Distal radial artery as an alternative approach to forearm radial artery for perioperative blood pressure monitoring: a randomized, controlled, noninferiority trial.远端桡动脉作为桡动脉掌侧入路的替代方法用于围术期血压监测的随机、对照、非劣效性试验。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2022 Mar 9;22(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s12871-022-01609-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Distal radial access in interventional cardiology: technique, pitfalls and recommendations.介入心脏病学中的桡动脉远端入路:技术、陷阱与建议。
Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2025 Jun 30;15(3):665-683. doi: 10.21037/cdt-2025-66. Epub 2025 Jun 26.
2
Efficacy and success rate of Distal Radial Artery Access at the Anatomical Snuffbox for Coronary Intervention at Central Chest Institute of Thailand.泰国中央胸部研究所解剖鼻烟壶处桡动脉远端入路用于冠状动脉介入治疗的疗效及成功率
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2025 Feb 19;25(1):115. doi: 10.1186/s12872-025-04545-7.
3
Distal Transradial Access Optimization: A Prospective Trial of Ultrasound-Guided Radial Artery Characterization for the Anatomical Snuffbox.

本文引用的文献

1
Distal transradial artery access in the anatomical snuffbox for coronary angiography as an alternative access site for faster hemostasis.经解剖鼻烟窝行远端桡动脉入路行冠状动脉造影术作为一种更快止血的替代入路。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Nov 1;94(5):651-657. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28155. Epub 2019 Feb 24.
2
Evaluation of the diameter of the distal radial artery at the anatomical snuff box using ultrasound in Japanese patients.在日本患者中使用超声评估鼻烟窝处桡动脉远端的直径。
Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2019 Oct;34(4):312-316. doi: 10.1007/s12928-018-00567-5. Epub 2019 Jan 7.
3
Manual Versus Mechanical Compression of the Radial Artery After Transradial Coronary Angiography: The MEMORY Multicenter Randomized Trial.
桡动脉远端入路优化:一项针对解剖鼻烟壶区超声引导下桡动脉特征分析的前瞻性试验。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Sep 20;14(18):2081. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14182081.
4
Outcomes of a Modified Technique for Deflation of Distal Radial Artery Occlusion Device on Radial Artery Patency After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后改良技术用于桡动脉闭塞装置放气对桡动脉通畅性的影响
J Community Hosp Intern Med Perspect. 2023 Sep 2;13(5):39-43. doi: 10.55729/2000-9666.1227. eCollection 2023.
5
Application of ultrasound in cardiovascular intervention the distal radial artery approach: New wine in old bottles?超声在心血管介入中的应用——桡动脉远端入路:旧瓶装新酒?
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Dec 15;9:1019053. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.1019053. eCollection 2022.
6
Bilateral Distal Transradial Approach for Coiling of Basilar Artery Aneurysm: A Technical Note.双侧远端桡动脉入路弹簧圈栓塞基底动脉动脉瘤:技术要点。
Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2022 Aug 15;62(8):384-389. doi: 10.2176/jns-nmc.2022-0083. Epub 2022 Jun 24.
7
Safety and Feasibility of Ultrasound-Guided Access for Coronary Interventions through Distal Left Radial Route.经远端左侧桡动脉入路行冠状动脉介入治疗的安全性及可行性。
J Interv Cardiol. 2022 Mar 25;2022:2141524. doi: 10.1155/2022/2141524. eCollection 2022.
8
Comparison of Application Effects of Different Hemostasis Methods After Ischemic Cerebrovascular Intervention.缺血性脑血管介入术后不同止血方法的应用效果比较
Front Surg. 2022 Mar 7;9:850139. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.850139. eCollection 2022.
9
Transradial versus transfemoral access for acute stroke endovascular thrombectomy: a 4-year experience in a high-volume center.急性卒中血管内血栓切除术经桡动脉与经股动脉入路:在一个高容量中心的4年经验
Neuroradiology. 2022 May;64(5):999-1009. doi: 10.1007/s00234-021-02850-4. Epub 2021 Nov 12.
10
Anatomical snuff box approach for percutaneous coronary interventions - Current status.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的解剖鼻烟盒入路——现状。
Indian Heart J. 2021 Sep-Oct;73(5):539-543. doi: 10.1016/j.ihj.2021.08.007. Epub 2021 Aug 25.
经桡动脉冠状动脉造影后桡动脉手动与机械压迫:MEMORY 多中心随机试验。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Jun 11;11(11):1050-1058. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2018.03.042.
4
Impact of sheath size and hemostasis time on radial artery patency after transradial coronary angiography and intervention in Japanese and non-Japanese patients: A substudy from RAP and BEAT (Radial Artery Patency and Bleeding, Efficacy, Adverse evenT) randomized multicenter trial.经桡动脉冠状动脉造影和介入治疗后,鞘管大小和止血时间对日本和非日本患者桡动脉通畅率的影响:RAP 和 BEAT(桡动脉通畅率和出血、疗效、不良事件)随机多中心试验的亚研究。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Nov 1;92(5):844-851. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27526. Epub 2018 Feb 16.
5
Ultrasound-guided radial artery catheterisation increases the success rate among anaesthesiology residents: a randomised study.超声引导下桡动脉置管可提高麻醉住院医师的成功率:一项随机研究。
J Vasc Access. 2017 Nov 17;18(6):546-551. doi: 10.5301/jva.5000702. Epub 2017 Jun 6.
6
Left distal transradial access in the anatomical snuffbox for coronary angiography (ldTRA) and interventions (ldTRI).经解剖鼻烟窝行左侧远端桡动脉入路行冠状动脉造影(ldTRA)和介入治疗(ldTRI)。
EuroIntervention. 2017 Sep 20;13(7):851-857. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-17-00079.
7
Should the Benefit of Transradial Access Still Be Questioned?经桡动脉途径的益处仍应受到质疑吗?
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 May 9;9(9):908-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.03.020.
8
Safety and feasibility of the new 5 Fr Glidesheath Slender.新型5 Fr Glidesheath Slender导管的安全性与可行性。
Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2016 Jan;31(1):38-41. doi: 10.1007/s12928-015-0344-2. Epub 2015 Jul 4.
9
Ultrasound-Guided Catheterization of the Femoral Artery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.超声引导下股动脉置管:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
J Invasive Cardiol. 2015 Jul;27(7):318-23.
10
Radial versus femoral access in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing invasive management: a randomised multicentre trial.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性冠状动脉综合征患者中桡动脉与股动脉入路的随机多中心试验。
Lancet. 2015 Jun 20;385(9986):2465-76. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60292-6. Epub 2015 Mar 16.