• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估接种各种附生微生物菌群对无菌黑麦草发酵特性和微生物群落动态的影响。

Assessment of inoculating various epiphytic microbiota on fermentative profile and microbial community dynamics in sterile Italian ryegrass.

机构信息

Institute of Ensiling and Processing of Grass, College of Agro-Grassland Science, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, China.

出版信息

J Appl Microbiol. 2020 Sep;129(3):509-520. doi: 10.1111/jam.14636. Epub 2020 Apr 12.

DOI:10.1111/jam.14636
PMID:32167651
Abstract

AIMS

To evaluate the effects of various epiphytic microbiota from Italian ryegrass (IR), maize (MZ) and sorghum (SG) on fermentative profile and microbial community dynamics in sterile IR.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Using microbiota transplantation, the irradiated IR was treated with the following: (i) sterile water; (ii) epiphytic microbiota on IR (IRIR); (iii) epiphytic microbiota on MZ (IRMZ); (iv) epiphytic microbiota on SG (IRSG). After 60 days of ensiling, MZ and SG microbiota significantly (P < 0·05) decreased lactic acid (LA) and acetic acid (AA) concentrations compared to IR microbiota, while SG microbiota notably (P < 0·05) reduced the ratio of LA to AA than MZ and IR microbiota. Apparently (P < 0·01) higher amounts of Lactobacillus genus were observed in IRIR and IRMZ groups on 60 day compared to IRSG group, and the dominant Lactococcus genus on 3 day was eventually replaced by Enterobacteriaceae and Lactobacillus in IRSG group.

CONCLUSIONS

Exogenous microbiota could evidently affect the fermentative profile and microbial community dynamics of IR silage. The numbers of Enterobacteriaceae and Lactobacillus were mainly responsible for this.

SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY

Identifying the role of microbe during ensiling is of great significance to manipulate the fermentation products and improve the preservation of silage.

摘要

目的

评估意大利黑麦草(IR)、玉米(MZ)和高粱(SG)的各种附生微生物群落对无菌 IR 发酵特性和微生物群落动态的影响。

方法和结果

使用微生物群落移植,用以下方法处理辐照 IR:(i)无菌水;(ii)IR 上的附生微生物群落(IRIR);(iii)MZ 上的附生微生物群落(IRMZ);(iv)SG 上的附生微生物群落(IRSG)。青贮 60 天后,与 IR 微生物群落相比,MZ 和 SG 微生物群落显著(P<0.05)降低了乳酸(LA)和乙酸(AA)浓度,而 SG 微生物群落显著(P<0.05)降低了 LA 与 AA 的比例比 MZ 和 IR 微生物群落。显然(P<0.01),与 IRSG 组相比,IRIR 和 IRMZ 组在 60 天时乳杆菌属的数量明显更高,而在 3 天时占主导地位的乳球菌属最终被肠杆菌科和乳杆菌属取代。

结论

外源性微生物群落可以明显影响 IR 青贮的发酵特性和微生物群落动态。肠杆菌科和乳杆菌属的数量主要负责这一点。

研究的意义和影响

在青贮过程中识别微生物的作用对于操纵发酵产物和提高青贮的保存具有重要意义。

相似文献

1
Assessment of inoculating various epiphytic microbiota on fermentative profile and microbial community dynamics in sterile Italian ryegrass.评估接种各种附生微生物菌群对无菌黑麦草发酵特性和微生物群落动态的影响。
J Appl Microbiol. 2020 Sep;129(3):509-520. doi: 10.1111/jam.14636. Epub 2020 Apr 12.
2
Abundance and diversity of epiphytic microbiota on forage crops and their fermentation characteristic during the ensiling of sterile sudan grass.青贮苏丹草过程中饲料作物附生微生物菌群的丰度和多样性及其发酵特性。
World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2021 Jan 12;37(2):27. doi: 10.1007/s11274-020-02991-3.
3
Effects of various epiphytic microbiota inoculation on the fermentation quality and microbial community dynamics during the ensiling of sterile Napier grass.不同附生微生物接种对无菌象草青贮过程中发酵品质和微生物群落动态的影响。
J Appl Microbiol. 2021 May;130(5):1466-1480. doi: 10.1111/jam.14896. Epub 2020 Oct 28.
4
Silage fermentation characteristics and microbial diversity of alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) in response to exogenous microbiota from temperate grasses.苜蓿(Medicago sativa L.)对外源温带禾草微生物组的青贮发酵特性及微生物多样性响应
World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2021 Oct 22;37(12):204. doi: 10.1007/s11274-021-03155-7.
5
Microbial diversity and fermentation profile of red clover silage inoculated with reconstituted indigenous and exogenous epiphytic microbiota.接种重组土著和外源附生微生物群的红三叶草青贮的微生物多样性和发酵特性。
Bioresour Technol. 2020 Oct;314:123606. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2020.123606. Epub 2020 May 30.
6
Fermentation profile and microbial diversity of temperate grass silage inoculated with epiphytic microbiota from tropical grasses.接种热带牧草附生微生物菌群对温带牧草青贮发酵特性及微生物多样性的影响。
Arch Microbiol. 2021 Dec;203(10):6007-6019. doi: 10.1007/s00203-021-02555-5. Epub 2021 Oct 19.
7
Sequencing and microbiota transplantation to determine the role of microbiota on the fermentation type of oat silage.测序和微生物移植以确定微生物群在燕麦青贮发酵类型中的作用。
Bioresour Technol. 2020 Aug;309:123371. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2020.123371. Epub 2020 Apr 11.
8
Fermentation Profiles, Bacterial Community Compositions, and Their Predicted Functional Characteristics of Grass Silage in Response to Epiphytic Microbiota on Legume Forages.豆科牧草上附生微生物群对青贮草发酵特性、细菌群落组成及其预测功能特性的影响
Front Microbiol. 2022 Feb 8;13:830888. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.830888. eCollection 2022.
9
Effect of epiphytic microbiota from napiergrass and Sudan grass on fermentation characteristics and bacterial community in oat silage.黑麦草和苏丹草附生微生物对燕麦青贮发酵特性和细菌群落的影响。
J Appl Microbiol. 2022 Feb;132(2):919-932. doi: 10.1111/jam.15293. Epub 2021 Sep 18.
10
Diurnal Variation of Epiphytic Microbiota: an Unignorable Factor Affecting the Anaerobic Fermentation Characteristics of Sorghum-Sudangrass Hybrid Silage.附生微生物群落的昼夜变化:影响高粱-苏丹草混贮青贮厌氧发酵特性的不可忽视因素。
Microbiol Spectr. 2023 Feb 14;11(1):e0340422. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.03404-22. Epub 2022 Dec 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Influence on the fermentation quality, microbial diversity, and metabolomics in the ensiling of sunflower stalks and alfalfa.向日葵秸秆与苜蓿青贮过程中对发酵品质、微生物多样性及代谢组学的影响
Front Plant Sci. 2024 Jan 26;15:1333207. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1333207. eCollection 2024.
2
Ensiling hybrid with lactic acid bacteria or organic acids improved the fermentation quality and bacterial community.用乳酸菌或有机酸青贮杂交种提高了发酵品质和细菌群落。
Front Microbiol. 2023 Jun 29;14:1216722. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1216722. eCollection 2023.
3
Effect of different regions on fermentation profiles, microbial communities, and their metabolomic pathways and properties in Italian ryegrass silage.
不同区域对意大利黑麦草青贮发酵特性、微生物群落及其代谢途径和特性的影响
Front Microbiol. 2023 Jan 16;13:1076499. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.1076499. eCollection 2022.
4
and propionic acid improve the fermentation quality of high-moisture amaranth silage by altering the microbial community composition.丙酸通过改变微生物群落组成来提高高水分苋菜青贮饲料的发酵品质。
Front Microbiol. 2022 Dec 21;13:1066641. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.1066641. eCollection 2022.
5
Current approaches on the roles of lactic acid bacteria in crop silage.当前关于乳酸菌在作物青贮中作用的研究方法。
Microb Biotechnol. 2023 Jan;16(1):67-87. doi: 10.1111/1751-7915.14184. Epub 2022 Dec 5.
6
Exploring the Epiphytic Microbial Community Structure of Forage Crops: Their Adaptation and Contribution to the Fermentation Quality of Forage Sorghum during Ensiling.探索饲料作物的附生微生物群落结构:它们在青贮过程中对饲料高粱发酵品质的适应性及贡献。
Bioengineering (Basel). 2022 Aug 30;9(9):428. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering9090428.
7
Effects of different harvest frequencies on microbial community and metabolomic properties of annual ryegrass silage.不同收割频率对一年生黑麦草青贮饲料微生物群落和代谢组学特性的影响。
Front Microbiol. 2022 Aug 30;13:971449. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.971449. eCollection 2022.
8
Addition of Organic Acids and to the Leguminous Forage Improved the Quality and Decreased Harmful Bacteria of the Silage.向豆科牧草中添加有机酸和[具体物质未给出]可提高青贮饲料质量并减少有害细菌。
Animals (Basel). 2022 Aug 31;12(17):2260. doi: 10.3390/ani12172260.
9
Fermentative products and bacterial community structure of C4 forage silage in response to epiphytic microbiota from C3 forages.C4饲料青贮料响应C3饲料附生微生物群的发酵产物和细菌群落结构
Anim Biosci. 2022 Dec;35(12):1860-1870. doi: 10.5713/ab.21.0543. Epub 2022 Apr 29.
10
The Effect of Early and Delayed Harvest on Dynamics of Fermentation Profile, Chemical Composition, and Bacterial Community of King Grass Silage.早期收割和延迟收割对王草青贮饲料发酵特性、化学成分及细菌群落动态的影响
Front Microbiol. 2022 Apr 7;13:864649. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.864649. eCollection 2022.