• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

探索饲料作物的附生微生物群落结构:它们在青贮过程中对饲料高粱发酵品质的适应性及贡献。

Exploring the Epiphytic Microbial Community Structure of Forage Crops: Their Adaptation and Contribution to the Fermentation Quality of Forage Sorghum during Ensiling.

作者信息

Nazar Mudasir, Ullah Muhammad Wajid, Wang Siran, Zhao Jie, Dong Zhihao, Li Junfeng, Kaka Niaz Ali, Shao Tao

机构信息

Institute of Ensiling and Processing of Grass, College of Agro-Grassland Science, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China.

Biofuels Institute, School of the Environment and Safety Engineering, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China.

出版信息

Bioengineering (Basel). 2022 Aug 30;9(9):428. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering9090428.

DOI:10.3390/bioengineering9090428
PMID:36134971
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9495736/
Abstract

In this study, the effects of epiphytic microbiota from different forages on the fermentation characteristics and microbial community structure of forage sorghum silage were investigated. The gamma irradiated sterilized forage sorghum was treated through sterile water, epiphytic microbiota of forage sorghum (FSm), Sudan grass (SDm), Napier grass (NPm), and maize (MZm). NPm and SDm inoculated silages showed similar pH value and lactic acid (LA) and acetic acid (AA) contents at day 3 and 60 of ensiling. The final silage of FSm and MZm showed lower (p < 0.05) pH and AA content and a higher LA content compared to the NPm and SDm silages. Bacterial species from the Weisella genus were predominantly present in FSm, NPm, and SDm, while Lactococcus dominated the MZm silage during early ensiling. Lactobacillus was predominant in all inoculated terminal silages. Overall, the four inoculated microbiota decreased the pH value of silage and were dominated by lactic acid bacteria (LAB); however, the NPm and SDm treatments resulted in comparatively higher AA contents which could have an inhibitory effect on the secondary fermentation developed by the yeast and enhanced the aerobic stability of forage sorghum silage.

摘要

本研究考察了不同草料附生微生物群对饲用高粱青贮发酵特性和微生物群落结构的影响。用γ射线辐照灭菌的饲用高粱分别用无菌水、饲用高粱(FSm)、苏丹草(SDm)、象草(NPm)和玉米(MZm)的附生微生物群进行处理。接种NPm和SDm的青贮饲料在青贮第3天和第60天时,pH值、乳酸(LA)和乙酸(AA)含量相似。与接种NPm和SDm的青贮饲料相比,接种FSm和MZm的最终青贮饲料pH值和AA含量较低(p<0.05),LA含量较高。魏斯氏菌属细菌主要存在于FSm、NPm和SDm中,而在青贮前期,乳球菌在接种MZm的青贮饲料中占主导地位。在所有接种的最终青贮饲料中,乳酸菌占主导。总体而言,四种接种的微生物群均降低了青贮饲料的pH值,且以乳酸菌(LAB)为主;然而,NPm和SDm处理导致AA含量相对较高,这可能会抑制酵母引发的二次发酵,并提高饲用高粱青贮饲料的有氧稳定性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d483/9495736/811f9f5367f8/bioengineering-09-00428-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d483/9495736/9d80545f1b9a/bioengineering-09-00428-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d483/9495736/f92e4ea91f54/bioengineering-09-00428-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d483/9495736/161c2e9b0c56/bioengineering-09-00428-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d483/9495736/bf60877701dd/bioengineering-09-00428-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d483/9495736/3d29cf5c359e/bioengineering-09-00428-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d483/9495736/811f9f5367f8/bioengineering-09-00428-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d483/9495736/9d80545f1b9a/bioengineering-09-00428-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d483/9495736/f92e4ea91f54/bioengineering-09-00428-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d483/9495736/161c2e9b0c56/bioengineering-09-00428-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d483/9495736/bf60877701dd/bioengineering-09-00428-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d483/9495736/3d29cf5c359e/bioengineering-09-00428-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d483/9495736/811f9f5367f8/bioengineering-09-00428-g006.jpg

相似文献

1
Exploring the Epiphytic Microbial Community Structure of Forage Crops: Their Adaptation and Contribution to the Fermentation Quality of Forage Sorghum during Ensiling.探索饲料作物的附生微生物群落结构:它们在青贮过程中对饲料高粱发酵品质的适应性及贡献。
Bioengineering (Basel). 2022 Aug 30;9(9):428. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering9090428.
2
Abundance and diversity of epiphytic microbiota on forage crops and their fermentation characteristic during the ensiling of sterile sudan grass.青贮苏丹草过程中饲料作物附生微生物菌群的丰度和多样性及其发酵特性。
World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2021 Jan 12;37(2):27. doi: 10.1007/s11274-020-02991-3.
3
Effects of various epiphytic microbiota inoculation on the fermentation quality and microbial community dynamics during the ensiling of sterile Napier grass.不同附生微生物接种对无菌象草青贮过程中发酵品质和微生物群落动态的影响。
J Appl Microbiol. 2021 May;130(5):1466-1480. doi: 10.1111/jam.14896. Epub 2020 Oct 28.
4
Effect of epiphytic microbiota from napiergrass and Sudan grass on fermentation characteristics and bacterial community in oat silage.黑麦草和苏丹草附生微生物对燕麦青贮发酵特性和细菌群落的影响。
J Appl Microbiol. 2022 Feb;132(2):919-932. doi: 10.1111/jam.15293. Epub 2021 Sep 18.
5
Effects of inoculation and dry matter content on microbiome dynamics and metabolome profiling of sorghum silage.接种和干物质含量对高粱青贮微生物组动态和代谢组特征的影响。
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2024 Mar 8;108(1):257. doi: 10.1007/s00253-024-13096-4.
6
Using a high-throughput sequencing technology to evaluate the various forage source epiphytic microbiota and their effect on fermentation quality and microbial diversity of Napier grass.利用高通量测序技术评估不同草料来源的附生微生物群及其对象草发酵品质和微生物多样性的影响。
Arch Microbiol. 2021 Oct;203(8):4879-4890. doi: 10.1007/s00203-021-02296-5. Epub 2021 Jul 9.
7
Gamma-ray irradiation and microbiota transplantation to separate the effects of chemical and microbial diurnal variations on the fermentation characteristics and bacterial community of Napier grass silage.γ射线辐照和微生物群移植以区分化学和微生物昼夜变化对象草青贮发酵特性和细菌群落的影响。
J Sci Food Agric. 2022 Aug 15;102(10):4322-4332. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.11784. Epub 2022 Feb 4.
8
The feasibility and effects of exogenous epiphytic microbiota on the fermentation quality and microbial community dynamics of whole crop corn.外源附生微生物群对全株玉米发酵品质和微生物群落动态的可行性及影响
Bioresour Technol. 2020 Jun;306:123106. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2020.123106. Epub 2020 Mar 3.
9
Diurnal Variation of Epiphytic Microbiota: an Unignorable Factor Affecting the Anaerobic Fermentation Characteristics of Sorghum-Sudangrass Hybrid Silage.附生微生物群落的昼夜变化:影响高粱-苏丹草混贮青贮厌氧发酵特性的不可忽视因素。
Microbiol Spectr. 2023 Feb 14;11(1):e0340422. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.03404-22. Epub 2022 Dec 15.
10
Fermentation profile and microbial diversity of temperate grass silage inoculated with epiphytic microbiota from tropical grasses.接种热带牧草附生微生物菌群对温带牧草青贮发酵特性及微生物多样性的影响。
Arch Microbiol. 2021 Dec;203(10):6007-6019. doi: 10.1007/s00203-021-02555-5. Epub 2021 Oct 19.

引用本文的文献

1
The Future of Anaerobic Digestion: Challenges and Opportunities.厌氧消化的未来:挑战与机遇
Bioengineering (Basel). 2025 May 15;12(5):524. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering12050524.
2
Silage Characteristics of Selected Forage Maize Varieties Harvested in Sole and Forage Legume Mixtures.单作及与豆科牧草混播收获的选定饲用玉米品种的青贮特性
ScientificWorldJournal. 2025 Mar 28;2025:2270637. doi: 10.1155/tswj/2270637. eCollection 2025.
3
Farm management practices and season dependent factors affect the microbial community and chemical profile of corn and grass-legume silages of farms in Ontario, Québec, and Northern New York.

本文引用的文献

1
Abundance and diversity of epiphytic microbiota on forage crops and their fermentation characteristic during the ensiling of sterile sudan grass.青贮苏丹草过程中饲料作物附生微生物菌群的丰度和多样性及其发酵特性。
World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2021 Jan 12;37(2):27. doi: 10.1007/s11274-020-02991-3.
2
Effects of various epiphytic microbiota inoculation on the fermentation quality and microbial community dynamics during the ensiling of sterile Napier grass.不同附生微生物接种对无菌象草青贮过程中发酵品质和微生物群落动态的影响。
J Appl Microbiol. 2021 May;130(5):1466-1480. doi: 10.1111/jam.14896. Epub 2020 Oct 28.
3
农场管理实践和季节相关因素会影响安大略省、魁北克省和纽约州北部农场的玉米青贮饲料以及禾本科-豆科牧草青贮饲料的微生物群落和化学特征。
Front Microbiol. 2023 Jul 19;14:1214915. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1214915. eCollection 2023.
4
Metagenomics analysis reveals the performance of homo- and heterofermentative lactic acid bacteria in alfalfa silage fermentation, bacterial community, and functional profiles.宏基因组学分析揭示了同型和异型发酵乳酸菌在苜蓿青贮发酵、细菌群落和功能谱中的性能。
J Anim Sci. 2023 Jan 3;101. doi: 10.1093/jas/skad163.
5
Effects of ambient temperature and available sugar on bacterial community of leaf: An study.环境温度和可利用糖对叶片细菌群落的影响:一项研究
Front Microbiol. 2023 Jan 6;13:1072666. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.1072666. eCollection 2022.
Microbial diversity and fermentation profile of red clover silage inoculated with reconstituted indigenous and exogenous epiphytic microbiota.
接种重组土著和外源附生微生物群的红三叶草青贮的微生物多样性和发酵特性。
Bioresour Technol. 2020 Oct;314:123606. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2020.123606. Epub 2020 May 30.
4
Assessment of inoculating various epiphytic microbiota on fermentative profile and microbial community dynamics in sterile Italian ryegrass.评估接种各种附生微生物菌群对无菌黑麦草发酵特性和微生物群落动态的影响。
J Appl Microbiol. 2020 Sep;129(3):509-520. doi: 10.1111/jam.14636. Epub 2020 Apr 12.
5
Microbial community and fermentation characteristic of Italian ryegrass silage prepared with corn stover and lactic acid bacteria.利用玉米秸秆和乳酸菌制备的黑麦草青贮的微生物群落和发酵特性。
Bioresour Technol. 2019 May;279:166-173. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2019.01.107. Epub 2019 Jan 26.
6
Dynamics of microbial community and fermentation quality during ensiling of sterile and nonsterile alfalfa with or without Lactobacillus plantarum inoculant.无菌和非无菌苜蓿青贮过程中添加或不添加植物乳杆菌接种剂时微生物群落动态和发酵品质。
Bioresour Technol. 2019 Mar;275:280-287. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2018.12.067. Epub 2018 Dec 21.
7
Fermentation characteristics, chemical composition and microbial community of tropical forage silage under different temperatures.不同温度下热带牧草青贮饲料的发酵特性、化学成分及微生物群落
Asian-Australas J Anim Sci. 2019 May;32(5):665-674. doi: 10.5713/ajas.18.0085. Epub 2018 Jul 26.
8
Microbial communities and natural fermentation of corn silages prepared with farm bunker-silo in Southwest China.中国西南地区农场筒仓青贮玉米的微生物群落和自然发酵。
Bioresour Technol. 2018 Oct;265:282-290. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2018.06.018. Epub 2018 Jun 8.
9
Assessing the fermentation quality and microbial community of the mixed silage of forage soybean with crop corn or sorghum.评价饲用大豆与大田玉米或高粱混贮的发酵品质和微生物群落。
Bioresour Technol. 2018 Oct;265:563-567. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2018.05.097. Epub 2018 May 29.
10
Dynamic bacterial and fungal microbiomes during sweet sorghum ensiling impact bioethanol production.青贮甜高粱过程中动态细菌和真菌微生物组对生物乙醇生产的影响。
Bioresour Technol. 2018 Sep;264:163-173. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2018.05.053. Epub 2018 May 26.