• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

PopRank:评估页面在 Facebook 上的影响力和用户参与度。

PopRank: Ranking pages' impact and users' engagement on Facebook.

机构信息

Istituto dei Sistemi Complessi (ISC)-CNR, UOS Sapienza, Rome, Italy.

IMT School for Advanced Studies, Lucca, Italy.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2019 Jan 28;14(1):e0211038. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0211038. eCollection 2019.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0211038
PMID:30689652
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6349323/
Abstract

The advent of social networks revolutionized the way people access to information sources. Understanding the complex relationship between these sources and users is crucial. We introduce an algorithm, that we call PopRank, to assess both the Impact of Facebook pages as well as users' Engagement on the basis of their mutual interactions. The ideas behind the PopRank are that i) high impact pages attract many users with a low engagement, which means that they receive comments from users that rarely comment, and ii) high engagement users interact with high impact pages, that is they mostly comment pages with a high popularity. The resulting ranking of pages can predict the number of comments a page will receive and the number of its future posts. Pages' impact turns out to be slightly dependent on the quality of pages' informative content (e.g., science vs conspiracy) but independent of users' polarization.

摘要

社交网络的出现彻底改变了人们获取信息来源的方式。理解这些来源和用户之间的复杂关系至关重要。我们引入了一种算法,称为 PopRank,用于根据它们的相互作用评估 Facebook 页面的影响力以及用户的参与度。PopRank 的理念是:i)高影响力的页面吸引了许多低参与度的用户,这意味着它们收到了很少发表评论的用户的评论;ii)高参与度的用户与高影响力的页面互动,也就是说,他们主要评论高人气的页面。由此产生的页面排名可以预测页面将收到的评论数量和未来发布的帖子数量。页面的影响力与页面信息内容的质量(例如,科学与阴谋)略有相关,但与用户的两极分化无关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef26/6349323/8b65f0820b05/pone.0211038.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef26/6349323/de07f554e173/pone.0211038.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef26/6349323/17800595bad2/pone.0211038.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef26/6349323/1f4e7213a57c/pone.0211038.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef26/6349323/5a366f06acf0/pone.0211038.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef26/6349323/8b65f0820b05/pone.0211038.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef26/6349323/de07f554e173/pone.0211038.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef26/6349323/17800595bad2/pone.0211038.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef26/6349323/1f4e7213a57c/pone.0211038.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef26/6349323/5a366f06acf0/pone.0211038.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef26/6349323/8b65f0820b05/pone.0211038.g005.jpg

相似文献

1
PopRank: Ranking pages' impact and users' engagement on Facebook.PopRank:评估页面在 Facebook 上的影响力和用户参与度。
PLoS One. 2019 Jan 28;14(1):e0211038. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0211038. eCollection 2019.
2
Representation of health conditions on Facebook: content analysis and evaluation of user engagement.脸书上健康状况的呈现:内容分析与用户参与度评估
J Med Internet Res. 2014 Aug 4;16(8):e182. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3275.
3
The portrayal and perceptions of cesarean section in Mexican media Facebook pages: a mixed-methods study.墨西哥媒体 Facebook 页面中对剖宫产的描述和看法:一项混合方法研究。
Reprod Health. 2022 Feb 22;19(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s12978-022-01351-8.
4
Facebook Users' Interactions, Organic Reach, and Engagement in a Smoking Cessation Intervention: Content Analysis.脸书用户在戒烟干预中的互动、自然触及和参与情况:内容分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Jun 21;23(6):e27853. doi: 10.2196/27853.
5
Online social networking and US poison control centers: Facebook as a means of information distribution.在线社交网络和美国毒物控制中心:Facebook 作为信息传播的一种手段。
Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2015 Jun;53(5):466-9. doi: 10.3109/15563650.2015.1014906. Epub 2015 Mar 12.
6
Polarization of the vaccination debate on Facebook.脸书上的疫苗接种辩论极化。
Vaccine. 2018 Jun 14;36(25):3606-3612. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.05.040.
7
Health Information in the Era of Social Media: An Analysis of the Nature and Accuracy of Posts Made by Public Facebook Pages for Patients with Endometriosis.社交媒体时代的健康信息:对子宫内膜异位症患者公共 Facebook 页面发布内容的性质和准确性的分析。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2021 Sep;28(9):1637-1642. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2021.02.005. Epub 2021 Feb 11.
8
The presence of academic health sciences libraries on Facebook: the relationship between content and library popularity.学术健康科学图书馆在脸书上的存在:内容与图书馆受欢迎程度之间的关系。
Med Ref Serv Q. 2012;31(2):171-87. doi: 10.1080/02763869.2012.670588.
9
Social Media Content of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis Groups and Pages on Facebook: Cross-sectional Analysis.社交媒体中特发性肺纤维化群组和页面的内容:横断面分析。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2021 May 31;7(5):e24199. doi: 10.2196/24199.
10
Characterizing engagement dynamics across topics on Facebook.刻画 Facebook 上各主题的参与动态。
PLoS One. 2023 Jun 28;18(6):e0286150. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0286150. eCollection 2023.

引用本文的文献

1
Selective exposure shapes the Facebook news diet.选择性接触塑造了 Facebook 的新闻资讯获取习惯。
PLoS One. 2020 Mar 13;15(3):e0229129. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229129. eCollection 2020.

本文引用的文献

1
Debunking in a world of tribes.在部落化的世界中破除谬误。
PLoS One. 2017 Jul 24;12(7):e0181821. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0181821. eCollection 2017.
2
The complex dynamics of products and its asymptotic properties.产品的复杂动态及其渐近性质。
PLoS One. 2017 May 17;12(5):e0177360. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0177360. eCollection 2017.
3
Anatomy of news consumption on Facebook.脸书上新闻消费的剖析。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Mar 21;114(12):3035-3039. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1617052114. Epub 2017 Mar 6.
4
Complex Economies Have a Lateral Escape from the Poverty Trap.复杂经济体有摆脱贫困陷阱的横向途径。
PLoS One. 2017 Jan 10;12(1):e0168540. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0168540. eCollection 2017.
5
Users Polarization on Facebook and Youtube.脸书和优兔上用户的两极分化。
PLoS One. 2016 Aug 23;11(8):e0159641. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0159641. eCollection 2016.
6
The spreading of misinformation online.网上错误信息的传播。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Jan 19;113(3):554-9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1517441113. Epub 2016 Jan 4.
7
Trend of Narratives in the Age of Misinformation.错误信息时代的叙事趋势。
PLoS One. 2015 Aug 14;10(8):e0134641. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0134641. eCollection 2015.
8
Science vs conspiracy: collective narratives in the age of misinformation.科学与阴谋:错误信息时代的集体叙事
PLoS One. 2015 Feb 23;10(2):e0118093. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0118093. eCollection 2015.
9
A network analysis of countries' export flows: firm grounds for the building blocks of the economy.国家出口流的网络分析:经济构建模块的坚实基础。
PLoS One. 2012;7(10):e47278. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0047278. Epub 2012 Oct 19.
10
A new metrics for countries' fitness and products' complexity.国家健康水平和产品复杂度新指标。
Sci Rep. 2012;2:723. doi: 10.1038/srep00723. Epub 2012 Oct 10.