Department of Paediatrics, Erasmus MC, Sophia Children's Hospital, Wytemaweg 80, 3015 CN, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Paediatr Drugs. 2020 Apr;22(2):229-239. doi: 10.1007/s40272-020-00386-3.
The structured digital dosing guidelines of the web-based Dutch Paediatric Formulary provided the opportunity to develop an integrated paediatric dose calculator. In a simulated setting, we tested the ability of this calculator to reduce calculation errors.
Volunteer healthcare professionals were allocated to one of two groups, manual calculation versus the use of the dose calculator. Professionals in both groups were given access to a web-based questionnaire with 14 patient cases for which doses had to be calculated. The effect of group allocation on the probability of making a calculation error was determined using generalized estimated equations (GEE) logistic regression analysis. The causes of all the erroneous calculations were evaluated.
Seventy-seven healthcare professionals completed the web-based questionnaire: thirty-seven were allocated to the manual group and 40 to the calculator group. Use of the dose calculator resulted in an estimated mean probability of a calculation error of 24.4% (95% CI 16.3-34.8) versus 39.0% (95% CI 32.4-46.1) with use of manual calculation. The mean difference of probability of calculation error between groups was 14.6% (95% CI 3.1-26.2; p = 0.013). In a secondary analysis where calculation error was defined as a 10% or greater deviation from the correct answer, the corresponding figures were 19.5% (95% CI 13-28.2) versus 26.5% (95% CI 21.6-32.1) with a mean difference of 7% between groups (95% CI 2.2-16.3; p = 0.137). Juxtaposition, typo/transcription errors and non-specified errors were more frequent as cause of error in the calculator group; exceeding the maximum dose and wrong correction for age were more frequent in the manual group. The percentage of tenfold errors was 3.1% in the manual group and 3.7% in the calculator group.
Our study shows that the use of a dose calculator as an add-on to a web-based paediatric formulary can reduce calculation errors. Furthermore, it shows that technologies may introduce new errors through transcription errors and wrongly selecting parameters from drop-down lists. Therefore, dosing calculators should be developed and used with special attention for selection and transcription errors.
基于网络的荷兰儿科处方集的结构化数字剂量指南提供了开发集成儿科剂量计算器的机会。在模拟环境中,我们测试了该计算器减少计算错误的能力。
志愿者医疗保健专业人员被分配到手动计算组或使用剂量计算器组。两组专业人员都可以访问一个包含 14 个病例的网络问卷,这些病例需要计算剂量。使用广义估计方程(GEE)逻辑回归分析确定分组对计算错误概率的影响。评估了所有错误计算的原因。
77 名医疗保健专业人员完成了网络问卷:37 名被分配到手动组,40 名被分配到计算器组。使用剂量计算器导致计算错误的概率估计平均值为 24.4%(95%CI 16.3-34.8),而使用手动计算则为 39.0%(95%CI 32.4-46.1)。两组之间计算错误概率的平均差异为 14.6%(95%CI 3.1-26.2;p=0.013)。在二次分析中,将计算错误定义为与正确答案相差 10%或更大的偏差,相应的数字为 19.5%(95%CI 13-28.2)与 26.5%(95%CI 21.6-32.1),两组之间的平均差异为 7%(95%CI 2.2-16.3;p=0.137)。在计算器组中,更常见的错误原因是并列、打字/转录错误和未指定错误;在手动组中,更常见的错误原因是超过最大剂量和错误的年龄校正。手动组的十倍错误率为 3.1%,计算器组为 3.7%。
我们的研究表明,在基于网络的儿科处方集上使用剂量计算器作为附加工具可以减少计算错误。此外,它表明技术可能会通过转录错误和从下拉列表中错误选择参数引入新的错误。因此,应特别注意选择和转录错误来开发和使用剂量计算器。