Feldman Gilad, Albarracín Dolores
Department of Work and Social Psychology, Maastricht University, Maastricht 6200MD, The Netherlands.
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (UIUC) Psychology Department.
J Exp Soc Psychol. 2017 Mar;69:111-120. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2016.07.009. Epub 2016 Aug 1.
The action-effect (Kahneman & Tversky, 1982) is one of the most widely cited and replicated effects in the regret literature, showing that negative outcomes are regretted more when they are a result of action compared to inaction. Building on theoretical arguments by norm theory (Kahneman & Miller, 1986) and the concept of normality, we examine the role of social norms for action and inaction in affecting regret. In four experiments we manipulated social norms and action-effect scenarios and found that social norms matter. For decisions resulting in negative outcomes, action is regretted more than inaction when social norms are for inaction, but when social norms are for action the effect is significantly weakened (Experiments 1 and 4) or reversed (Experiments 2 and 3).
行动效应(卡尼曼和特沃斯基,1982)是后悔文献中被引用和复制最为广泛的效应之一,表明与不作为相比,当负面结果是行动的结果时,人们会更后悔。基于规范理论(卡尼曼和米勒,1986)的理论观点以及常态概念,我们考察了社会规范对行动和不作为在影响后悔方面的作用。在四项实验中,我们操纵了社会规范和行动效应情景,发现社会规范很重要。对于导致负面结果的决策,当社会规范倾向于不作为时,行动比不作为更令人后悔,但当社会规范倾向于行动时,这种效应会显著减弱(实验1和4)或逆转(实验2和3)。