Connolly T, Ordóñatez LD, Coughlan R
University of Arizona
Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1997 Apr;70(1):73-85. doi: 10.1006/obhd.1997.2695.
The negative affect associated with bad decision outcomes is often thought to involve feelings of remorse or self-blame. For example, studies showing greater regret associated with active than with passive choice are interpreted as the active chooser piling self-recrimination on top the disappointment of a poor outcome. Corresponding rejoicing is postulated for active choice that leads to good outcomes. The five experiments reported here challenge such a view. In each, hypothetical individuals experienced identical gains or losses, some as a result of their own choice, others as a result of an external, arbitrary process. Though evaluations of final outcomes were heavily influenced by the paths by which the outcomes were reached, and by the comparison levels that were evoked, in no case was decision agency a significant influence. In these experiments, then, the "active chooser" effect appears more a matter of change than of choice, of the route taken rather than whether one is the driver or the passenger. Further research will be needed to establish the circumstances under which different salient comparisons are evoked.
与糟糕决策结果相关的负面影响通常被认为涉及悔恨或自责的情绪。例如,研究表明主动选择比被动选择会带来更大的遗憾,这被解释为主动做出选择的人在糟糕结果的失望之上又增添了自我谴责。对于带来良好结果的主动选择,相应地会有欣喜之情。这里报告的五个实验对这种观点提出了挑战。在每个实验中,假设的个体经历了相同的收益或损失,一些是由于他们自己的选择,另一些是由于外部的、任意的过程。尽管对最终结果的评估受到结果达成路径以及所引发的比较水平的严重影响,但在任何情况下,决策能动性都不是一个显著的影响因素。那么,在这些实验中,“主动选择者”效应似乎更多地是一个变化而非选择的问题,是所采取的路径问题,而不是一个人是司机还是乘客的问题。需要进一步的研究来确定在哪些情况下会引发不同的显著比较。