• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

象征性成功如何影响左翼选民的再分配?以 2017 年法国总统选举为例。

How does symbolic success affect redistribution in left-wing voters? A focus on the 2017 French presidential election.

机构信息

Psychology and Neuroscience Lab, EA 7489, Université de Lorraine, Nancy, France.

Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne, CNRS UMR 8174, Paris, France.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2020 Mar 16;15(3):e0229096. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229096. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0229096
PMID:32176697
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7075674/
Abstract

Redistribution preferences depend on factors such as self-interest and political views. Recently, Deffains et al. (2016) reported that redistributive behavior is also sensitive to the actual experience of success or failure in a real effort task. While successful participants ('overachievers') are more likely to attribute their success to their effort rather than luck and opt for less redistribution, unsuccessful participants ('underachievers') tend to attribute their failure to external factors and opt for more redistribution. The aim of the present study was to test how the experience of success (symbolic success) and political views interact in producing redistributive behavior in an experimental setting. The study was conducted during the 2017 French presidential election. Our sample was biased towards left-wing, and most participants reported voting for Mélenchon, Hamon or Macron. Our findings reveal that 1) Macron voters redistribute less than Hamon voters who themselves redistribute less than Mélenchon voters, 2) overachievers redistribute less than underachievers only among Mélenchon voters. This suggests that redistributive behavior is governed primarily by political opinions, and that influence by exogenous manipulation of symbolic success is not homogenous across left-wing political groups.

摘要

分配偏好取决于自身利益和政治观点等因素。最近,Deffains 等人(2016)报告称,分配行为也对实际努力任务中的实际成功或失败体验敏感。成功的参与者(“成绩优异者”)更有可能将成功归因于努力而非运气,并选择较少的再分配,而不成功的参与者(“成绩较差者”)则倾向于将失败归因于外部因素,并选择更多的再分配。本研究旨在测试在实验环境中,成功体验(象征性成功)和政治观点如何相互作用产生分配行为。该研究在 2017 年法国总统选举期间进行。我们的样本偏向于左翼,大多数参与者表示投票给梅朗雄、阿蒙或马克龙。我们的研究结果表明:1)马克龙的选民比阿蒙的选民再分配少,而阿蒙的选民又比梅朗雄的选民再分配少;2)只有在梅朗雄的选民中,成绩优异者比成绩较差者再分配少。这表明,分配行为主要由政治观点决定,而对象征性成功的外部操纵的影响在左翼政治群体中并不一致。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d2ca/7075674/eebef861c736/pone.0229096.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d2ca/7075674/a784162ec19f/pone.0229096.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d2ca/7075674/eebef861c736/pone.0229096.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d2ca/7075674/a784162ec19f/pone.0229096.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d2ca/7075674/eebef861c736/pone.0229096.g002.jpg

相似文献

1
How does symbolic success affect redistribution in left-wing voters? A focus on the 2017 French presidential election.象征性成功如何影响左翼选民的再分配?以 2017 年法国总统选举为例。
PLoS One. 2020 Mar 16;15(3):e0229096. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229096. eCollection 2020.
2
Correction: How does symbolic success affect redistribution in left-wing voters? A focus on the 2017 French presidential election.更正:象征性的成功如何影响左翼选民的再分配?聚焦2017年法国总统选举。
PLoS One. 2020 May 21;15(5):e0233868. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233868. eCollection 2020.
3
Single-Target Implicit Association Tests (ST-IAT) Predict Voting Behavior of Decided and Undecided Voters in Swiss Referendums.单目标内隐联想测验(ST-IAT)可预测瑞士公投中已决定和未决定选民的投票行为。
PLoS One. 2016 Oct 12;11(10):e0163872. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0163872. eCollection 2016.
4
Determinants of Attitude toward the Public Health Spending and Its Relationship with Voting Behavior in the 2012 South Korean Presidential Election.2012年韩国总统选举中公众对公共卫生支出态度的决定因素及其与投票行为的关系
PLoS One. 2016 Oct 6;11(10):e0163763. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0163763. eCollection 2016.
5
Australian voters' attitudes to climate action and their social-political determinants.澳大利亚选民对气候行动的态度及其社会政治决定因素。
PLoS One. 2021 Mar 24;16(3):e0248268. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248268. eCollection 2021.
6
Health care in the 2004 presidential election.2004年总统选举中的医疗保健问题。
N Engl J Med. 2004 Sep 23;351(13):1314-22. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa042360.
7
Voting Intention and Choices: Are Voters Always Rational and Deliberative?投票意向与选择:选民总是理性且经过深思熟虑的吗?
PLoS One. 2016 Feb 17;11(2):e0148643. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0148643. eCollection 2016.
8
Decisions among the undecided: implicit attitudes predict future voting behavior of undecided voters.犹豫不决者的抉择:内隐态度预测未决选民未来的投票行为。
PLoS One. 2014 Jan 29;9(1):e85680. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0085680. eCollection 2014.
9
The 1996 election: older voters and implications for policies on aging.1996年的选举:老年选民及其对老龄政策的影响。
Gerontologist. 1997 Feb;37(1):15-9. doi: 10.1093/geront/37.1.15.
10
Do implicit attitudes predict actual voting behavior particularly for undecided voters?内隐态度是否能预测实际投票行为,特别是对那些犹豫不决的选民?
PLoS One. 2012;7(8):e44130. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0044130. Epub 2012 Aug 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Correction: How does symbolic success affect redistribution in left-wing voters? A focus on the 2017 French presidential election.更正:象征性的成功如何影响左翼选民的再分配?聚焦2017年法国总统选举。
PLoS One. 2020 May 21;15(5):e0233868. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233868. eCollection 2020.

本文引用的文献

1
Metacognitive Failure as a Feature of Those Holding Radical Beliefs.元认知失败是持有激进信仰者的特征。
Curr Biol. 2018 Dec 17;28(24):4014-4021.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2018.10.053.
2
Reconstruction of the socio-semantic dynamics of political activist Twitter networks-Method and application to the 2017 French presidential election.重建政治活动家推特网络的社会语义动态——以 2017 年法国总统选举为例的方法与应用。
PLoS One. 2018 Sep 19;13(9):e0201879. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0201879. eCollection 2018.
3
Exposure to rising inequality shapes Americans' opportunity beliefs and policy support.
不断加剧的不平等现象使美国人对机会的信念和政策支持发生转变。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Sep 5;114(36):9593-9598. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1706253114. Epub 2017 Aug 22.
4
Income Mobility Breeds Tolerance for Income Inequality: Cross-National and Experimental Evidence.收入流动会增强人们对收入不平等的容忍度:跨国和实验证据。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2016 May;11(3):373-80. doi: 10.1177/1745691616635596.
5
The self-control consequences of political ideology.政治意识形态的自我控制后果。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Jul 7;112(27):8250-3. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1503530112. Epub 2015 Jun 22.
6
Neurocognitive correlates of liberalism and conservatism.自由主义与保守主义的神经认知关联。
Nat Neurosci. 2007 Oct;10(10):1246-7. doi: 10.1038/nn1979. Epub 2007 Sep 9.